freezie wrote:jak111 wrote:safariguy5 wrote:Vote Count
Neb(6)- Skillfu, eldario, everywhere, cm5, mob, edoc
betiko(1)- cowboyz
dazza(1)- freezie
eldario(2)- Neb, yoshi
hippo(2)- sound, jonty
IB(1)- betiko
MoB(1)- hippo
With 24 alive, it takes 13 to lynch.
Deadline is midnight May 1st, PST. If no lynch is decided by then, the day will end in a no lynch.
3. jak111
5. Iron Butterfly
8. Leehar
9. skillfusniper33
12. Eldario
13. SPARTACUS1974
14. Djfireside
15. dazza2008
19. Roussallier replaced by Some7hingClever
21. shieldgenerator7
22. thechuck51
23. ghostly447
12 people not voting... Hmm, anyone think we should squeeze out one or two information spoils? I'd go with IB, Dazza, Betiko, or Eldario if anyone agrees on one of them to squeeze some info out, hmm?

All 4 people that are 'not voting' are actually speaking and voicing their thoughts. I see no reason to pressure them for 'not voting' when they are contributing. Especially since dazza clearly posted her itentions...
But I am still waiting on Neb's answer to my question, before I take another route.
Small note actually. I was not posting because I didnt have time to play. Though I do not in any way see where I voiced my thoughts. I think freezie may be trying to act like s/he is giving input when, obviously, unless I am misunderstanding, is not true input.
jak111 wrote:Yes Leehar, I missed a single voter, what are you going to do? Burn me to the stake for missing a single name? Like I said it was just a simple list so we knew who was able to put their votes somewhere without having to take their votes away from another source.
If I must explain why I picked the four that I did, then I challenge you to do the same thing every time you place your vote on someone.
I put IB on the list because he/she is active yes, but I haven't played with this person and he/she has only really picked up the pace when I called him/her out on it. It could be said about a few people here but I'm interested in learning IB's tactics quickly.
I put Dazza on the list because he's... on and off this game, so far I usually see him getting in someones face, so either he's trying to lay low this time or he doesn't have a major role, either way it's useful perhaps getting info on him.
This is my second game with Betiko, again I'd like to learn his/her playing strategies. If he/she is scum it'd be useful catching him/her in a lie. Or if he/she is town it'd be useful getting aid into him/her.
Finally Eldario... This is another player I haven't played with before. Seems to be an agreeable target a while back.
I mean if you'd like I could change my list to Leehar, Leehar, Leehar, and what do you know... Leehar.
None of the people I mentioned do I wish to be lynched, I simply am looking for info for today to go on tonight.
You know, I dont normally take suspicion to Jak because he is very active in scum hunting..But if you wanted someone on your list, I am going to be honest and say I should have been on there. I am normally hyper-active, and though I was posting non stop that I was trying to get active, I cant see why he wouldnt have a little suspicion on me and be willing to pressure me. Weirdish logic, yes. A good point, possibly. Something worth looking into if activity drops? Absolutely.
Iron Butterfly wrote:So you made your list not for the common good of catching scum but in learning tactic of players you are playing? You make no mention of pressuring scum behavior. In essence you are creating a list that fits to your criteria and not anyone else.
What you seem to be saying is that you want others to pressure me to claim not because I have done anything wrong but because I would suit your agenda. You want to learn my tactics, whatever that means. You also seem to believe that you are the reason I am now posting actively. Having a child and family, job and real life drama combined with a useless joke vote phase AND other Mafia games couldn't possibly been the reason. In your eyes, because you got me playing that now entitles you to put me on a list to be pressured to claim?
At the end you seem to imply you don't want us lynched you just want information to take into the evening, which implies you would be happy with a no lynch as well.
Directly after the quote I took from jak. This is a really good point.
dazza2008 wrote:Vote Jak.
I don't think he answered what I asked earlier and his play here has been strange. His reasons for the players on his list to be pressured are weak. He is not scum hunting just wanting to pressure players to learn tactics or because I am not "in someone's face".
His whole play here looks like scum trying to look town.
Wow, plenty on P26. This post is simply restating exactly what was said by IB, and then jumping on the BW. It also concerns me, because he also hopped on the IB BW...With this:
dazza2008 wrote:Nebuchadnezer wrote:dazza2008 wrote:Nebuchadnezer wrote:There are 9 people NOT voting.
Those nine should vote now...or we just vote them to hang. That's a much simpler plan than a yoshi call. Lets at least get everyone with a vote somewhere for future reference...as much as this first vote means...
That just means 9 people never joke voted. That is no reason to pressure them. If they are completely inactive then maybe.
Why are you against the yoshi call? Got something to hide?
Nope. In fact I was at the bottom of the list, so I won't even have to rank anything. It just gets tiresome to sit through day one with absolutely no way to figure anything out. We all know the end result its a lynched townie anyway...why drag out the inevitable? Lets take our 5% shot and hear a claim...
Ok bud.
Unvote vote Neb.
Yeah, that is very helpful... Lots of reasoning to push for the claim there

.
Anyways, done reading page 26. I will finish tomorrow hopefully. Probably tonight. We will see. This is just my input for this class period, and I may be able to get a little more done (maybe 1 more page max) before leaving class today.