Conquer Club

Czecho Slovak Fragmentation [Quenched]

Care to peruse completed maps? Take a stroll through the Atlas.

Moderator: Cartographers

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Re: Fragmentation of CSFR - credits added

Postby chapcrap on Mon Dec 10, 2012 6:54 pm

Thanks for the credit. :)
Lieutenant chapcrap
 
Posts: 9686
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2008 12:46 am
Location: Kansas City

Re: Fragmentation of CSFR - update 12/07, page30

Postby cairnswk on Wed Dec 12, 2012 12:14 am

cairnswk wrote:
Oneyed wrote:...
credits added. cairnswk just your batterfly is missing, so please add here somewhere :)
...
Oneyed

Oneyed. I'm happy with the credit given. butterfly not needed, thanks anyways. :)

Please be advised that you may have my credits from CC to dispose of as you wish...but wisely!
Image
* Pearl Harbour * Waterloo * Forbidden City * Jamaica * Pot Mosbi
User avatar
Private cairnswk
 
Posts: 11510
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 8:32 pm
Location: Australia

Re: Fragmentation of CSFR - update 12/07, page30

Postby Oneyed on Wed Dec 12, 2012 2:14 am

cairnswk wrote:Please be advised that you may have my credits from CC to dispose of as you wish...but wisely!


thanks. I already have this appeal.

Oneyed
User avatar
Private 1st Class Oneyed
 
Posts: 1058
Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2011 12:29 pm

Re: Fragmentation of CSFR - xml done. anything more needed?

Postby Oneyed on Wed Jan 02, 2013 3:51 am

xml is done. anything more is needed? or just patience now :) ?

Oneyed
User avatar
Private 1st Class Oneyed
 
Posts: 1058
Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2011 12:29 pm

Re: Fragmentation of CSFR - xml done. anything more needed?

Postby cairnswk on Wed Jan 02, 2013 4:35 am

Oneyed wrote:...or just patience now :) ?
Oneyed

Yes, that, patience.
I think the mods went on holidays over Xmas...seems that way anyways. ;)
Image
* Pearl Harbour * Waterloo * Forbidden City * Jamaica * Pot Mosbi
User avatar
Private cairnswk
 
Posts: 11510
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 8:32 pm
Location: Australia

Re: Fragmentation of CSFR - xml done. anything more needed?

Postby Dukasaur on Fri Jan 04, 2013 11:22 pm

Prepare the champagne!

(Or slivovitz... :D )
Image
User avatar
Lieutenant Dukasaur
Community Coordinator
Community Coordinator
 
Posts: 26964
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 4:49 pm
Location: Beautiful Niagara
32

Re: Fragmentation of CSFR - xml done. anything more needed?

Postby Oneyed on Sat Jan 05, 2013 3:28 am

Dukasaur wrote:Prepare the champagne!

(Or slivovitz... :D )


slivovica (slivovice)/slivovitz is far, far better :lol:

Oneyed
User avatar
Private 1st Class Oneyed
 
Posts: 1058
Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2011 12:29 pm

Re: Fragmentation of CSFR - xml done. anything more needed?

Postby Oneyed on Tue Jan 08, 2013 1:02 pm

I made a small graphics change. I add story to the map. do you think it is better?
Click image to enlarge.
image


Oneyed
User avatar
Private 1st Class Oneyed
 
Posts: 1058
Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2011 12:29 pm

Re: Fragmentation of CSFR - added story to the map. better?

Postby x-raider on Wed Jan 09, 2013 2:15 am

"During the year 1992, the Czech and Slovak Governments made the decision to divide the common state. The dissolution took effect on January 1st, 1993."
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class x-raider
 
Posts: 248
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 5:32 am
Location: Lost in the Complexities of the Undiscovered Universe

Re: Fragmentation of CSFR - added story to the map. better?

Postby Oneyed on Wed Jan 09, 2013 8:28 am

thanks to cairnswk and x-raider for help with story text.

Click image to enlarge.
image


Click image to enlarge.
image


Oneyed
User avatar
Private 1st Class Oneyed
 
Posts: 1058
Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2011 12:29 pm

Re: Fragmentation of CSFR - added story to the map. better?

Postby cairnswk on Wed Jan 09, 2013 11:48 am

Oneyed, i am seeing the same story :o
Image
* Pearl Harbour * Waterloo * Forbidden City * Jamaica * Pot Mosbi
User avatar
Private cairnswk
 
Posts: 11510
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 8:32 pm
Location: Australia

Re: Fragmentation of CSFR - added story to the map. better?

Postby Oneyed on Wed Jan 09, 2013 11:54 am

cairnswk wrote:Oneyed, i am seeing the same story :o


cairnswk wrote:Oneyed...the story is good, but i know you may need better English...if you like...
"In 1992, the Czech and Slovak governments made the decision to divide the common state which became valid on January 1, 1993."
Only if you think this is improvement...


this is your advice. I used it except "In 1992" I used "During"...

Oneyed
User avatar
Private 1st Class Oneyed
 
Posts: 1058
Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2011 12:29 pm

Re: Fragmentation of CSFR - added story to the map. better?

Postby nolefan5311 on Wed Jan 09, 2013 12:28 pm

Oneyed wrote:
cairnswk wrote:Oneyed, i am seeing the same story :o


cairnswk wrote:Oneyed...the story is good, but i know you may need better English...if you like...
"In 1992, the Czech and Slovak governments made the decision to divide the common state which became valid on January 1, 1993."
Only if you think this is improvement...


this is your advice. I used it except "In 1992" I used "During"...

Oneyed


Change it to cairnswk suggestion. Also, you used "become" instead of "became", and that needs to be fixed as well. Also, I think you need to elaborate a little more, perhaps one more sentence on why they decided to do that, or the actual result of their agreement. Something like that.

"In 1992, the Czech and Slovak governments decided to divide the common state into two independent countries, the Czech Republic and the Slovak Republic, and on January 1, 1993, the two countries were created." Using "became valid" implies that prior to Jan 1, 1993 it was invalid.
User avatar
Captain nolefan5311
 
Posts: 1768
Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2010 11:51 am
Location: Florida

Re: Fragmentation of CSFR - added story to the map. better?

Postby cairnswk on Wed Jan 09, 2013 12:36 pm

Oneyed wrote:
cairnswk wrote:Oneyed, i am seeing the same story :o


cairnswk wrote:Oneyed...the story is good, but i know you may need better English...if you like...
"In 1992, the Czech and Slovak governments made the decision to divide the common state which became valid on January 1, 1993."
Only if you think this is improvement...


this is your advice. I used it except "In 1992" I used "During"...

Oneyed

Oneyed. I am still seeing a story which says "...become to valid..."

Also, I think you need to elaborate a little more, perhaps one more sentence on why they decided to do that, or the actual result of their agreement. Something like that.

I actually don't beleive this is necessary to elaborate...if people want to find out more there is always Google or other search engines.
The map is about fragmentation of said country...it has bonuses for both republics...therefore the result must be that the state was divided :)
Image
* Pearl Harbour * Waterloo * Forbidden City * Jamaica * Pot Mosbi
User avatar
Private cairnswk
 
Posts: 11510
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 8:32 pm
Location: Australia

Re: Fragmentation of CSFR - added story to the map. better?

Postby Oneyed on Wed Jan 09, 2013 12:40 pm

nolefan5311 wrote:
"In 1992, the Czech and Slovak governments made the decision to divide the common state which went into effect on January 1, 1993. As a result, two independent countries, the Czech Republic and Slovakia (or Slovak Republic) were created." Using "became valid" implies that prior to Jan 1, 1993 it was invalid.


will care more about grammar ;)
I used during 1992 because it was long and complicated process. everything as finance, army... must be divided. and only in Jan 1, 1993 it was official and this is also date of creating new states Czech republic and Slovak republic.

so could we find any final version? thanks for help

Oneyed
User avatar
Private 1st Class Oneyed
 
Posts: 1058
Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2011 12:29 pm

Re: Fragmentation of CSFR - added story to the map. better?

Postby nolefan5311 on Wed Jan 09, 2013 12:43 pm

Oneyed wrote:
nolefan5311 wrote:
"In 1992, the Czech and Slovak governments made the decision to divide the common state which went into effect on January 1, 1993. As a result, two independent countries, the Czech Republic and Slovakia (or Slovak Republic) were created." Using "became valid" implies that prior to Jan 1, 1993 it was invalid.


will care more about grammar ;)
I used during 1992 because it was long and complicated process. everything as finance, army... must be divided. and only in Jan 1, 1993 it was official and this is also date of creating new states Czech republic and Slovak republic.

so could we find any final version? thanks for help

Oneyed


See my edited post above. I think everyone understands that it was a complicated process and not something that was done in 1 day. "During" just doesn't sound right though.
User avatar
Captain nolefan5311
 
Posts: 1768
Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2010 11:51 am
Location: Florida

Re: Fragmentation of CSFR - added story to the map. better?

Postby nolefan5311 on Wed Jan 09, 2013 12:43 pm

cairnswk wrote:
Oneyed wrote:
cairnswk wrote:Oneyed, i am seeing the same story :o


cairnswk wrote:Oneyed...the story is good, but i know you may need better English...if you like...
"In 1992, the Czech and Slovak governments made the decision to divide the common state which became valid on January 1, 1993."
Only if you think this is improvement...


this is your advice. I used it except "In 1992" I used "During"...

Oneyed

Oneyed. I am still seeing a story which says "...become to valid..."

Also, I think you need to elaborate a little more, perhaps one more sentence on why they decided to do that, or the actual result of their agreement. Something like that.

I actually don't beleive this is necessary to elaborate...if people want to find out more there is always Google or other search engines.
The map is about fragmentation of said country...it has bonuses for both republics...therefore the result must be that the state was divided :)


Well then why put the sentence in there at all then?
User avatar
Captain nolefan5311
 
Posts: 1768
Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2010 11:51 am
Location: Florida

Re: Fragmentation of CSFR - added story to the map. better?

Postby cairnswk on Wed Jan 09, 2013 1:13 pm

nolefan5311 wrote:...
Well then why put the sentence in there at all then?

It's a lead in story.
Image
* Pearl Harbour * Waterloo * Forbidden City * Jamaica * Pot Mosbi
User avatar
Private cairnswk
 
Posts: 11510
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 8:32 pm
Location: Australia

Re: Fragmentation of CSFR - added story to the map. better?

Postby Jippd on Wed Jan 09, 2013 10:21 pm

I can't find cairnswk's version.

I like xraiders though:
"During the year 1992 the Czech and Slovak Governments made the decision to divide the common state. The dissolution took effect on January 1st, 1993."
User avatar
Major Jippd
 
Posts: 1384
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 9:05 pm

Re: Fragmentation of CSFR - added story to the map. better?

Postby Oneyed on Thu Jan 10, 2013 4:34 pm

ok. could we gowith this version? I can have it not too long...

Click image to enlarge.
image


Click image to enlarge.
image


Oneyed
User avatar
Private 1st Class Oneyed
 
Posts: 1058
Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2011 12:29 pm

Re: Fragmentation of CSFR - added story to the map. better?

Postby nolefan5311 on Thu Jan 10, 2013 4:41 pm

Oneyed wrote:ok. could we gowith this version? I can have it not too long...

Click image to enlarge.
image


Click image to enlarge.
image


Oneyed


"...to divide the common state."

And it's "dissolution". You have an extra "on" on the end of it. Why don't you just make it "division", since you use "divide" in the previous sentence?
User avatar
Captain nolefan5311
 
Posts: 1768
Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2010 11:51 am
Location: Florida

Re: Fragmentation of CSFR - updated. Jan 10th, page 31

Postby Oneyed on Thu Jan 10, 2013 5:29 pm

Click image to enlarge.
image


Click image to enlarge.
image


Oneyed
User avatar
Private 1st Class Oneyed
 
Posts: 1058
Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2011 12:29 pm

Re: Fragmentation of CSFR - updated. Jan 10th, page 31

Postby Gilligan on Thu Jan 10, 2013 5:34 pm

Hello Oneyed/cairns,

I checked your XML and found an error.

On the map, it reads: Region and 2 towns inside its border, +4 for every 2 Kraj (similar to SR part of map).
In the XML, it stops at 2 Kraj. Are you not supposed to be given a +8 bonus if you have 4 Kraj?

Similar to capital: +1 for every 4 towns in CR, -1 for each Kraj in SR.
This bonus also stops at 4 towns and 1 Kraj. Should you not be given +2 for 8 towns in CR, and -2 for each Kraj in SR, held along with the capital? Example, if I hold Bratislava and 4 CR Kraj, according to current XML I get -2, but the way I read it you should get -4.
Image
User avatar
Captain Gilligan
 
Posts: 12478
Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 4:59 pm
Location: Providence, RI

Re: Fragmentation of CSFR - updated. Jan 10th, page 32

Postby Oneyed on Thu Jan 10, 2013 6:09 pm

cairns could you check xml ones more? it looks that Giligan is right.
also borders for Praha are: Kladno, Beroun, Tábor, StČK
and borders for Bratislava are: Kúty, Trenčín, Nitra, ZSK

is it not clear that capital could be attacked from region it is located in and from towns in the same region and from towns adjacent by railway?

thanks Giligan

Oneyed
User avatar
Private 1st Class Oneyed
 
Posts: 1058
Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2011 12:29 pm

Re: Fragmentation of CSFR - updated. Jan 10th, page 32

Postby cairnswk on Thu Jan 10, 2013 6:31 pm

On it guys.

Gilligan, are u saying i need to go to overrides?
Image
* Pearl Harbour * Waterloo * Forbidden City * Jamaica * Pot Mosbi
User avatar
Private cairnswk
 
Posts: 11510
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 8:32 pm
Location: Australia

PreviousNext

Return to The Atlas

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users