Moderator: Community Team
Bruceswar Ā» Tue Aug 28, 2012 8:59 pm wrote:We all had tons of men..
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
rdsrds2120 wrote:Which wave? I imagine 3rd, but you can never be too careful.
BMO
xeno wrote:Bitches have a right to the kitchen and not much else in my eyes
xeno wrote:Bitches have a right to the kitchen and not much else in my eyes
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
john9blue wrote:i'm a quantum feminist. i may or may not be a feminist depending on the type of feminism being discussed and (more importantly) the gender of the person i'm discussing it with.
john9blue wrote:i'm a quantum feminist. i may or may not be a feminist depending on the type of feminism being discussed and (more importantly) the gender of the person i'm discussing it with.
Iliad wrote:john9blue wrote:i'm a quantum feminist. i may or may not be a feminist depending on the type of feminism being discussed and (more importantly) the gender of the person i'm discussing it with.
Trust me john, you're not at all a feminist. Like, not in the slightest.
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
john9blue wrote:i'm a quantum feminist. i may or may not be a feminist depending on the type of feminism being discussed and (more importantly) the gender of the person i'm discussing it with.
john9blue wrote:Iliad wrote:john9blue wrote:i'm a quantum feminist. i may or may not be a feminist depending on the type of feminism being discussed and (more importantly) the gender of the person i'm discussing it with.
Trust me john, you're not at all a feminist. Like, not in the slightest.
oh, i see. thanks dude, i can always count on you to know my views better than i know them myself. just like everyone else in the world with a childish "us vs. them" mentality.
Iliad wrote:If you call yourself a feminist, you're only fooling yourself. Considering youse stance on transexuwlity in that thread about the basketballer and your 1960s-esque views on how female soldiers will reduce the "effectiveness" of units and distract them, well I can hardly see how you can call yourself a feminist. Being a neutral and objective libertarian you probably discount the idea of the patriarchy. Even if you don't none of your posts have displayed any feminist leanings.
And love you too Greek.
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
john9blue wrote:Iliad wrote:If you call yourself a feminist, you're only fooling yourself. Considering youse stance on transexuwlity in that thread about the basketballer and your 1960s-esque views on how female soldiers will reduce the "effectiveness" of units and distract them, well I can hardly see how you can call yourself a feminist. Being a neutral and objective libertarian you probably discount the idea of the patriarchy. Even if you don't none of your posts have displayed any feminist leanings.
And love you too Greek.
you mean the thread where i claimed it would be unfair for a former male who still has a partially male physique to play in a women's basketball league?
i'd say the same thing about a FtM playing in a men's league (where they could have, for example, a flexibility advantage due to having a partially female physique)
how exactly does that violate gender equality?
also, i had no idea that our species had evolved so much since 1960! your ideas are revolutionary and i want to subscribe to your newsletter, because i am out of toilet paper.
Return to Practical Explanation about Next Life,
Users browsing this forum: DirtyDishSoap