Moderator: Community Team
DoomYoshi wrote:
Some arguments that obviously come out of it:
1) Since a literal interpretation of the Bible is Jewish, all creationists are Jews. Everytime a creationist says "Christ" it is now to be considered a hate crime. As a Christian, I am deeply insulted by these Jews who keep talking shit about my Saviour. From now, all creationists who claim to be Christian are now moral Crusade targets - killing them is sin-free.
Funkyterrance wrote:DoomYoshi wrote:
Some arguments that obviously come out of it:
1) Since a literal interpretation of the Bible is Jewish, all creationists are Jews. Everytime a creationist says "Christ" it is now to be considered a hate crime. As a Christian, I am deeply insulted by these Jews who keep talking shit about my Saviour. From now, all creationists who claim to be Christian are now moral Crusade targets - killing them is sin-free.
That's sooome logic, Doomyoshi...
DoomYoshi wrote:Seriously though, creationists aren't Christians. They are the lowest form of life and are a hate group. This article has nothing to do with it though.
DoomYoshi wrote:Funkyterrance wrote:DoomYoshi wrote:
Some arguments that obviously come out of it:
1) Since a literal interpretation of the Bible is Jewish, all creationists are Jews. Everytime a creationist says "Christ" it is now to be considered a hate crime. As a Christian, I am deeply insulted by these Jews who keep talking shit about my Saviour. From now, all creationists who claim to be Christian are now moral Crusade targets - killing them is sin-free.
That's sooome logic, Doomyoshi...
As a fun game, count all the logical fallacies in my 3 arguments.
Seriously though, creationists aren't Christians. They are the lowest form of life and are a hate group. This article has nothing to do with it though.
Just_essence wrote:DoomYoshi wrote:Seriously though, creationists aren't Christians. They are the lowest form of life and are a hate group. This article has nothing to do with it though.
They aren't a hate group, technically. It's just that every member of the group you've met doesn't tolerate discussion on the matter. I am sure there are actually decent creationists, shocking as it might sound.
premio53 wrote:DoomYoshi wrote:Funkyterrance wrote:DoomYoshi wrote:
Some arguments that obviously come out of it:
1) Since a literal interpretation of the Bible is Jewish, all creationists are Jews. Everytime a creationist says "Christ" it is now to be considered a hate crime. As a Christian, I am deeply insulted by these Jews who keep talking shit about my Saviour. From now, all creationists who claim to be Christian are now moral Crusade targets - killing them is sin-free.
That's sooome logic, Doomyoshi...
As a fun game, count all the logical fallacies in my 3 arguments.
Seriously though, creationists aren't Christians. They are the lowest form of life and are a hate group. This article has nothing to do with it though.
There are many creationists who weren't Christians. Just like Richard Dawkins who implies that anyone who disagrees with his view of evolution is "evil," you have shown what kind of person you are. It's funny watching liberals like Bill Maher ridiculing Christianity and anyone with a conserative background in the vilest manner while not saying a peep about Muhammed. I'm still waiting for that "brave" individual who showed his artistic talent by displaying an upside down crucifix of Christ in a bottle of urine do the same with Muhammed. They are all hypocrites who know if they did such things they would be walking dead men.
Your childish and vile remarks concerning anyone who believes there was more than just a giant explosion when it comes to the universe we see around us has nothing to do with with your definition of "hate."
Albert Einstein certainly wasn't a Christian or a hater but saw intelligent design throughout the universe.
Max Planck who did not believe in a personal God stated the following, "All matter originates and exists only by virtue of a force which brings the particle of an atom to vibration and holds this most minute solar system of the atom together. We must assume behind this force the existence of a conscious and intelligent mind." [The Nature of Matter], speech at Florence, Italy (1944)
It's very simple why atheists ridicule and disdain anyone who disagrees with their views because without a Creator there are no moral absolutes and therefore no responsibility to anyone but themselves.
swimmerdude99 wrote:Just_essence wrote:DoomYoshi wrote:Seriously though, creationists aren't Christians. They are the lowest form of life and are a hate group. This article has nothing to do with it though.
They aren't a hate group, technically. It's just that every member of the group you've met doesn't tolerate discussion on the matter. I am sure there are actually decent creationists, shocking as it might sound.
This is so offensive its not even funny. Why do you guys hate anyone who is a creationist?
DoomYoshi wrote:swimmerdude99 wrote:Just_essence wrote:DoomYoshi wrote:Seriously though, creationists aren't Christians. They are the lowest form of life and are a hate group. This article has nothing to do with it though.
They aren't a hate group, technically. It's just that every member of the group you've met doesn't tolerate discussion on the matter. I am sure there are actually decent creationists, shocking as it might sound.
This is so offensive its not even funny. Why do you guys hate anyone who is a creationist?
Creationism is not historically based. Creationism, as we now know it, only started in the late 18th, early 19th century. While there is a 2000 year history of recognizing the bible, there is only a 200 year old history of considering it either inerrant or infaillable. Why should a bunch of modern people know what is meant by the bible than the people who lived during the time and wrote of it? In almost 3000 years of talmudics, there are no Jewish mentions of creationism, of the Genesis story being a literal interpretation. In the early Christian dialogue, the main question was whether the bible itself was to be taken allegorically or metaphorically. Metaphorically meaning the people in the OT did exist, but they are written as metaphors for what happened. Allegory meaning there were no such people that actually existed, they were merely allegories for how we should live our lives.
I should note that the Catholic Church, and the various popes alive since Darwin, have never declared evolution to be false. It is strictly a protestant thing. Protestantism is another weird thing. They take as a central tenet the Bible. But the bible, as it is canonized now, exists only to prove that the Catholic Church is the real church. In the early days of Christianity, there were hundreds of sects, all with different Bibles, and different writings. The Catholics declared that only those who used their version of the bible were real Christians, and that only Catholics used their version of the Bible. So, for any non-Catholic religion to be Bible-centric really makes no sense at all. I'm not saying that I agree with the Catholics. I think you can be a True Christian and not be Catholic; but to take the Bible as the main source of your inspiration? Once again, by not studying history, the charlatans have made some mistakes.
Swimmer, I am glad you asked this question, I have explained it a few times, but I don't mind doing it again, as I think it is more important to look at the history of whence our ideas originated than it is to listen to the preacher. That is only why I hate Creationism on religous grounds. On scientific grounds, as a biologist, I hate on those grounds as well, and believe me: there isn't a single good creationist argument. If you want greater detail, I would be willing to pm you in these matters.
@premio: I am not an atheist. I despise you and your revolting cock comrades for slandering the good name of my messiah. You are not a Christian, you are merely a charlatan, now get out of my thread. Just because Planck sees a God as creating the Universe (something that I didn't deny), why can't he also have created evolution? Neither Einstein nor Planck disbelieved evolution, so stop misappropriating sources.
DoomYoshi wrote:define "many". Also, how "many" of these "many" biologists are being honest? None. It is a fact that creationists, after swearing on the Bible, and being under oath either lie or retract their statements.
DoomYoshi wrote:So 40. Out of the tens of thousands of biological researchers and students in the world, 40 show some skepticism. More than half of those work at evangelical colleges like Biola U. Now, I don't know if you have studied Biola U, but the professors there don't need to have graduated from college. For example, Paul Kuld, who started teaching at Biola in '69, is still teaching there and has never gone to College. I could go through like to every one of your list, but in general they are crackpots and liars, not biologists.
premio53 wrote:DoomYoshi wrote:What childish belief? I am a Christian and a biologist.
So the fact that you believe in a fairy tale makes you right and everyone else a hater. Grow up.
DoomYoshi wrote:...As a citizen of this planet, it is my moral obligation to stamp out harmful ideas.
...While it may not be politically correct to force people into Man and Women marriage, it's certainly to their benefit if we as a society shun homosexuals, those with loose morals and divorcees. We need to, as a society, stamp out the idea that a lax moral code is OK..
DoomYoshi wrote:define "many". Also, how "many" of these "many" biologists are being honest? None. It is a fact that creationists, after swearing on the Bible, and being under oath either lie or retract their statements.
premio53 wrote:DoomYoshi wrote:What childish belief? I am a Christian and a biologist.
So the fact that you believe in a fairy tale makes you right and everyone else a hater. Grow up.
Return to Practical Explanation about Next Life,
Users browsing this forum: jusplay4fun