Conquer Club

Should NASA turn Voyager I back around?

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Should NASA turn Voyager I around and bring it back to Earth?

 
Total votes : 0

Re: Should NASA turn Voyager I back around?

Postby Metsfanmax on Sun Nov 18, 2012 9:49 pm

Funkyterrance wrote:
Metsfanmax wrote:
Funkyterrance wrote:Wtf? The military is a completely different subject and doesn't affect the fact that NASA is a waste. The advances gained through NASA are paltry compared to the amount of money dumped into the program.


Are they? For $18 billion dollars per year, what exactly do you expect out of them?


Meaning advances that can be useful to purposes other than NASA, to clarify. If anyone argues cell phones I'm going to laugh, btw.


So you don't have a problem with funding NASA, you have a problem with funding space science.

THIS is why we invest in science. This.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Metsfanmax
 
Posts: 6722
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 11:01 pm

Re: Should NASA turn Voyager I back around?

Postby Funkyterrance on Sun Nov 18, 2012 11:19 pm

Metsfanmax wrote:
Funkyterrance wrote:
Metsfanmax wrote:
Funkyterrance wrote:Wtf? The military is a completely different subject and doesn't affect the fact that NASA is a waste. The advances gained through NASA are paltry compared to the amount of money dumped into the program.


Are they? For $18 billion dollars per year, what exactly do you expect out of them?


Meaning advances that can be useful to purposes other than NASA, to clarify. If anyone argues cell phones I'm going to laugh, btw.


So you don't have a problem with funding NASA, you have a problem with funding space science.

THIS is why we invest in science. This.


Yeah, more or less. But I don't see why we have to fund the, for the most part, useless stuff along with the obviously beneficial.

NASA wrote: We will be at the forefront of exploration and science. We will develop and transfer to industry cutting-edge technologies in aeronautics and space to fulfill our national needs. We will establish a permanent human presence in space, expanding and sustaining human exploration, use, and development of space in our solar system and providing benefits in science, technology, and commerce that will contribute to a better life on the Earth for this and future generations. As we pursue our mission, we will enrich our Nation's society and economy. We will communicate widely the content, relevancy, and excitement of NASA's missions and discoveries to inspire and to increase understanding and the broad application of science and technology.


Half of this shit is rainbows and daydreams. Cut out the bs and get real.
User avatar
Colonel Funkyterrance
 
Posts: 2494
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 10:52 pm
Location: New Hampshire, USA

Postby 2dimes on Sun Nov 18, 2012 11:23 pm

Funkyterrance wrote:
Half of this shit is rainbows and daydreams. Cut out the bs and get real.

Now you've upset my unicorn.
User avatar
Corporal 2dimes
 
Posts: 12644
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 1:08 pm
Location: Pepperoni Hug Spot.

Re: Should NASA turn Voyager I back around?

Postby Haggis_McMutton on Sun Nov 18, 2012 11:57 pm

Funkyterrance wrote:Half of this shit is rainbows and daydreams. Cut out the bs and get real.


If by BS you mean anything that doesn't have an immediate practical utility, then the BS is probably more important than the practical applications.

The BS is one of the few things in today's world that reminds us of what's important. It's one of the few things most people are aware of that reminds us of the real relevance of all the current hot issues. Every time the space program gives us a glimpse of earth as the speck of dust it is, we are reminded, at least on some level, that 50 years from now all the pressing issues of the day will be completely meaningless, that no one will give a shit what Obama said last week or which party won majority in the last elections.

The BS not only reminds us of the insignificance of all the things we hold so dear, it also gives us a glimpse of humanity's potential, with every new insight about the universe it makes us wonder what we, humans, might be able to achieve if we could work just a tiny bit harder at putting our petty issues behind us.

Culture doesn't form in void. If we teach our kids to only think about the next 10 years, then that's the culture we will have and we'll probably end up killing each other before long. Science keeps marching ever ahead, culture has to follow it if we have any hope of avoiding anihilation/dystopia. Investment in stuff like NASA is one of the best ways I know of encouraging cultural growth.

Highest score: 3063; Highest position: 67;
Winner of {World War II tournament, -team 2010 Skilled Diversity, [FuN||Chewy]-[XII] USA};
8-3-7
User avatar
Major Haggis_McMutton
 
Posts: 403
Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2006 11:32 am

Re: Should NASA turn Voyager I back around?

Postby WILLIAMS5232 on Mon Nov 19, 2012 12:24 am

sending voyager was a do or die thing at the time i think. just had a small window to send it where it would pass all the planets. next possible time was like a hundred years or maybe a thousand.... anyway. a long time.

so it was more of a recon mission. at least we now have a pretty good idea there's not an alien race on neptune plannning an invasion on earth. probably saved us a bunch of money in the long run. ( plasma defense rockets, death ray gun force fields, tractor beams...etc. ) now we can just look at faint wobbles from distant stars and guess that there are planets that may carry life 800 million times farther away than where voyager is right now. maybe when we become extinct earth will create it's own super race that can put voyager to use as a satellite on a distant galaxy.
the options are really endless if you consider anything is possible.

i will say though, i'm a bit freaked out that we sent so much information about us out with voyager. i would have never have pulled the trigger on that one.

it creeps me out just listening to this.
Image
User avatar
Major WILLIAMS5232
 
Posts: 1838
Joined: Sun Aug 16, 2009 4:22 pm
Location: houston texas

Re: Should NASA turn Voyager I back around?

Postby Funkyterrance on Mon Nov 19, 2012 1:03 am

Haggis_McMutton wrote:
Funkyterrance wrote:Half of this shit is rainbows and daydreams. Cut out the bs and get real.


If by BS you mean anything that doesn't have an immediate practical utility, then the BS is probably more important than the practical applications.

The BS is one of the few things in today's world that reminds us of what's important. It's one of the few things most people are aware of that reminds us of the real relevance of all the current hot issues. Every time the space program gives us a glimpse of earth as the speck of dust it is, we are reminded, at least on some level, that 50 years from now all the pressing issues of the day will be completely meaningless, that no one will give a shit what Obama said last week or which party won majority in the last elections.

The BS not only reminds us of the insignificance of all the things we hold so dear, it also gives us a glimpse of humanity's potential, with every new insight about the universe it makes us wonder what we, humans, might be able to achieve if we could work just a tiny bit harder at putting our petty issues behind us.

Culture doesn't form in void. If we teach our kids to only think about the next 10 years, then that's the culture we will have and we'll probably end up killing each other before long. Science keeps marching ever ahead, culture has to follow it if we have any hope of avoiding anihilation/dystopia. Investment in stuff like NASA is one of the best ways I know of encouraging cultural growth.


Ok, aside from what your teacher told you in the 4th grade, do you have any real defense for space exploration besides you think it's "neat"? Your above statement is a prime example of an extremely sheltered point of view. I don't mean to be overly harsh but this is the exact mentality that causes crises in terms of resources. Do you think the droves of people out there pleasure driving their cars are enriching the world with their personal "endeavors"? No, they are masturbating, just like NASA does with it's rockets. We know that the earth is a speck in the grand scheme of things, we don't need billions of dollars spent to remind us.
User avatar
Colonel Funkyterrance
 
Posts: 2494
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 10:52 pm
Location: New Hampshire, USA

Re: Should NASA turn Voyager I back around?

Postby TA1LGUNN3R on Mon Nov 19, 2012 3:39 am

Funkyterrance wrote:
Haggis_McMutton wrote:
Funkyterrance wrote:Half of this shit is rainbows and daydreams. Cut out the bs and get real.


If by BS you mean anything that doesn't have an immediate practical utility, then the BS is probably more important than the practical applications.

The BS is one of the few things in today's world that reminds us of what's important. It's one of the few things most people are aware of that reminds us of the real relevance of all the current hot issues. Every time the space program gives us a glimpse of earth as the speck of dust it is, we are reminded, at least on some level, that 50 years from now all the pressing issues of the day will be completely meaningless, that no one will give a shit what Obama said last week or which party won majority in the last elections.

The BS not only reminds us of the insignificance of all the things we hold so dear, it also gives us a glimpse of humanity's potential, with every new insight about the universe it makes us wonder what we, humans, might be able to achieve if we could work just a tiny bit harder at putting our petty issues behind us.

Culture doesn't form in void. If we teach our kids to only think about the next 10 years, then that's the culture we will have and we'll probably end up killing each other before long. Science keeps marching ever ahead, culture has to follow it if we have any hope of avoiding anihilation/dystopia. Investment in stuff like NASA is one of the best ways I know of encouraging cultural growth.


Ok, aside from what your teacher told you in the 4th grade, do you have any real defense for space exploration besides you think it's "neat"? Your above statement is a prime example of an extremely sheltered point of view. I don't mean to be overly harsh but this is the exact mentality that causes crises in terms of resources. Do you think the droves of people out there pleasure driving their cars are enriching the world with their personal "endeavors"? No, they are masturbating, just like NASA does with it's rockets. We know that the earth is a speck in the grand scheme of things, we don't need billions of dollars spent to remind us.


Not really much of the entrepreneurial or imaginative type, are ya?

-TG
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class TA1LGUNN3R
 
Posts: 2699
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 12:52 am
Location: 22 Acacia Avenue

Re: Should NASA turn Voyager I back around?

Postby AAFitz on Mon Nov 19, 2012 7:52 am

dyrtydog wrote:not if they were made of Twinkies


Wheres the damn like button?
I'm Spanking Monkey now....err...I mean I'm a Spanking Monkey now...that shoots milk
Too much. I know.
Sergeant 1st Class AAFitz
 
Posts: 7270
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 9:47 am
Location: On top of the World 2.1

Re: Should NASA turn Voyager I back around?

Postby x-raider on Wed Nov 28, 2012 3:30 pm

Words say stuff.
So does a video:

I actually found this animator by stalking victor sullivan.

;)
-x
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class x-raider
 
Posts: 248
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 5:32 am
Location: Lost in the Complexities of the Undiscovered Universe

Re: Should NASA turn Voyager I back around?

Postby thegreekdog on Wed Nov 28, 2012 4:42 pm

TA1LGUNN3R wrote:
Funkyterrance wrote:
Haggis_McMutton wrote:
Funkyterrance wrote:Half of this shit is rainbows and daydreams. Cut out the bs and get real.


If by BS you mean anything that doesn't have an immediate practical utility, then the BS is probably more important than the practical applications.

The BS is one of the few things in today's world that reminds us of what's important. It's one of the few things most people are aware of that reminds us of the real relevance of all the current hot issues. Every time the space program gives us a glimpse of earth as the speck of dust it is, we are reminded, at least on some level, that 50 years from now all the pressing issues of the day will be completely meaningless, that no one will give a shit what Obama said last week or which party won majority in the last elections.

The BS not only reminds us of the insignificance of all the things we hold so dear, it also gives us a glimpse of humanity's potential, with every new insight about the universe it makes us wonder what we, humans, might be able to achieve if we could work just a tiny bit harder at putting our petty issues behind us.

Culture doesn't form in void. If we teach our kids to only think about the next 10 years, then that's the culture we will have and we'll probably end up killing each other before long. Science keeps marching ever ahead, culture has to follow it if we have any hope of avoiding anihilation/dystopia. Investment in stuff like NASA is one of the best ways I know of encouraging cultural growth.


Ok, aside from what your teacher told you in the 4th grade, do you have any real defense for space exploration besides you think it's "neat"? Your above statement is a prime example of an extremely sheltered point of view. I don't mean to be overly harsh but this is the exact mentality that causes crises in terms of resources. Do you think the droves of people out there pleasure driving their cars are enriching the world with their personal "endeavors"? No, they are masturbating, just like NASA does with it's rockets. We know that the earth is a speck in the grand scheme of things, we don't need billions of dollars spent to remind us.


Not really much of the entrepreneurial or imaginative type, are ya?

-TG


Caveat - I have no problem with NASA or my tax dollars going to scientific exploration.

Someone who wants to defund NASA does not necessarily lack in entrepreneurial traits or imagination. NASA is a goverment agency, which seems to be more of the problem than what it actually does. For example, I would prefer not to give money to welfare recipients. Does this mean that I'm not charitable? Of course not. It means I don't want the government to do it.
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class thegreekdog
 
Posts: 7245
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 6:55 am
Location: Philadelphia

Re: Should NASA turn Voyager I back around?

Postby TA1LGUNN3R on Wed Nov 28, 2012 5:23 pm

thegreekdog wrote:
TA1LGUNN3R wrote:
Funkyterrance wrote:
Haggis_McMutton wrote:
Funkyterrance wrote:Half of this shit is rainbows and daydreams. Cut out the bs and get real.


If by BS you mean anything that doesn't have an immediate practical utility, then the BS is probably more important than the practical applications.

The BS is one of the few things in today's world that reminds us of what's important. It's one of the few things most people are aware of that reminds us of the real relevance of all the current hot issues. Every time the space program gives us a glimpse of earth as the speck of dust it is, we are reminded, at least on some level, that 50 years from now all the pressing issues of the day will be completely meaningless, that no one will give a shit what Obama said last week or which party won majority in the last elections.

The BS not only reminds us of the insignificance of all the things we hold so dear, it also gives us a glimpse of humanity's potential, with every new insight about the universe it makes us wonder what we, humans, might be able to achieve if we could work just a tiny bit harder at putting our petty issues behind us.

Culture doesn't form in void. If we teach our kids to only think about the next 10 years, then that's the culture we will have and we'll probably end up killing each other before long. Science keeps marching ever ahead, culture has to follow it if we have any hope of avoiding anihilation/dystopia. Investment in stuff like NASA is one of the best ways I know of encouraging cultural growth.


Ok, aside from what your teacher told you in the 4th grade, do you have any real defense for space exploration besides you think it's "neat"? Your above statement is a prime example of an extremely sheltered point of view. I don't mean to be overly harsh but this is the exact mentality that causes crises in terms of resources. Do you think the droves of people out there pleasure driving their cars are enriching the world with their personal "endeavors"? No, they are masturbating, just like NASA does with it's rockets. We know that the earth is a speck in the grand scheme of things, we don't need billions of dollars spent to remind us.


Not really much of the entrepreneurial or imaginative type, are ya?

-TG


Caveat - I have no problem with NASA or my tax dollars going to scientific exploration.

Someone who wants to defund NASA does not necessarily lack in entrepreneurial traits or imagination. NASA is a goverment agency, which seems to be more of the problem than what it actually does. For example, I would prefer not to give money to welfare recipients. Does this mean that I'm not charitable? Of course not. It means I don't want the government to do it.


He replied to Mets that he doesn't have a problem with funding to NASA, just the space exploration. I can only question why somebody would be opposed to defunding NASA's primary objective, which could very well prove to be the greatest advent of mankind through the acquisition of more resources and knowledge and consequently better standards of living, but approves of funding for immediate gains. Therefore, if the shoe fits and all that...

Don't get me wrong, I am opposed to coercion in all its forms, including the tax schemes of the gov't. However, such as it is, to decry funding to NASA because of its perceived lessened benefits when NASA receives less than one percent of the budget while not saying anything about the much more wasteful avenues of the federal gov't (military, social security, etc.) is silly. The pursuit of knowledge almost always pays off. To use your example, welfare often doesn't.

-TG
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class TA1LGUNN3R
 
Posts: 2699
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 12:52 am
Location: 22 Acacia Avenue

Re: Should NASA turn Voyager I back around?

Postby thegreekdog on Wed Nov 28, 2012 5:29 pm

TA1LGUNN3R wrote:
thegreekdog wrote:
TA1LGUNN3R wrote:
Funkyterrance wrote:
Haggis_McMutton wrote:
Funkyterrance wrote:Half of this shit is rainbows and daydreams. Cut out the bs and get real.


If by BS you mean anything that doesn't have an immediate practical utility, then the BS is probably more important than the practical applications.

The BS is one of the few things in today's world that reminds us of what's important. It's one of the few things most people are aware of that reminds us of the real relevance of all the current hot issues. Every time the space program gives us a glimpse of earth as the speck of dust it is, we are reminded, at least on some level, that 50 years from now all the pressing issues of the day will be completely meaningless, that no one will give a shit what Obama said last week or which party won majority in the last elections.

The BS not only reminds us of the insignificance of all the things we hold so dear, it also gives us a glimpse of humanity's potential, with every new insight about the universe it makes us wonder what we, humans, might be able to achieve if we could work just a tiny bit harder at putting our petty issues behind us.

Culture doesn't form in void. If we teach our kids to only think about the next 10 years, then that's the culture we will have and we'll probably end up killing each other before long. Science keeps marching ever ahead, culture has to follow it if we have any hope of avoiding anihilation/dystopia. Investment in stuff like NASA is one of the best ways I know of encouraging cultural growth.


Ok, aside from what your teacher told you in the 4th grade, do you have any real defense for space exploration besides you think it's "neat"? Your above statement is a prime example of an extremely sheltered point of view. I don't mean to be overly harsh but this is the exact mentality that causes crises in terms of resources. Do you think the droves of people out there pleasure driving their cars are enriching the world with their personal "endeavors"? No, they are masturbating, just like NASA does with it's rockets. We know that the earth is a speck in the grand scheme of things, we don't need billions of dollars spent to remind us.


Not really much of the entrepreneurial or imaginative type, are ya?

-TG


Caveat - I have no problem with NASA or my tax dollars going to scientific exploration.

Someone who wants to defund NASA does not necessarily lack in entrepreneurial traits or imagination. NASA is a goverment agency, which seems to be more of the problem than what it actually does. For example, I would prefer not to give money to welfare recipients. Does this mean that I'm not charitable? Of course not. It means I don't want the government to do it.


He replied to Mets that he doesn't have a problem with funding to NASA, just the space exploration. I can only question why somebody would be opposed to defunding NASA's primary objective, which could very well prove to be the greatest advent of mankind through the acquisition of more resources and knowledge and consequently better standards of living, but approves of funding for immediate gains. Therefore, if the shoe fits and all that...

Don't get me wrong, I am opposed to coercion in all its forms, including the tax schemes of the gov't. However, such as it is, to decry funding to NASA because of its perceived lessened benefits when NASA receives less than one percent of the budget while not saying anything about the much more wasteful avenues of the federal gov't (military, social security, etc.) is silly. The pursuit of knowledge almost always pays off. To use your example, welfare often doesn't.

-TG


That's fair. I'm just not sure Terrance was being as, I don't know, against knowledge, as you were making him out to be.
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class thegreekdog
 
Posts: 7245
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 6:55 am
Location: Philadelphia

Re: Should NASA turn Voyager I back around?

Postby tzor on Fri Nov 30, 2012 8:32 am

Funkyterrance wrote:So essentially the satellite is the dead car to our galactic front yard.


Not exactly. The scale is wrong, a dead car takes up a visible percentage of the front yard. Think more of a lost, dead iPod shuffle in your front yard. You get close but you still don't get how vast space is and how small Voyager is.

It's modern art at its finest! (I realize that is not saying much!)
Image
User avatar
Cadet tzor
 
Posts: 4076
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 9:43 pm
Location: Long Island, NY, USA

Re: Should NASA turn Voyager I back around?

Postby Woodruff on Fri Jun 28, 2013 1:23 am

Every time we get an update from Voyager 1, it's history in the making:

http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2013/06/voyager-unexpected-region/
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Woodruff
 
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: Should NASA turn Voyager I back around?

Postby tzor on Fri Jun 28, 2013 7:18 am

Fascinating.
Image
User avatar
Cadet tzor
 
Posts: 4076
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 9:43 pm
Location: Long Island, NY, USA

Re: Should NASA turn Voyager I back around?

Postby patches70 on Fri Jun 28, 2013 11:26 am

It's not worth bothering with Voyager. A few quick calculations on the blue book value. It's 36 years old, in no where near mint condition and with a whopping 18,650,000,000,000 km of mileage on it, the blue book value on Voyager comes to (negative) -$18,000,000,000.

I don't think Voyager is worth salvaging....
Private patches70
 
Posts: 1664
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2010 12:44 pm

Re: Should NASA turn Voyager I back around?

Postby Dukasaur on Fri Jun 28, 2013 11:34 am

Image
User avatar
Lieutenant Dukasaur
Community Coordinator
Community Coordinator
 
Posts: 26963
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 4:49 pm
Location: Beautiful Niagara
32

Re: Should NASA turn Voyager I back around?

Postby jonesthecurl on Fri Jun 28, 2013 12:41 pm

Woodruff wrote:Every time we get an update from Voyager 1, it's history in the making:

http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2013/06/voyager-unexpected-region/


how odd. I thought the scientists had all banded together in a god-hating conspiracy to keep us ignorant. Don't tell me they're admitting they don't know something.
instagram.com/garethjohnjoneswrites
User avatar
Lieutenant jonesthecurl
 
Posts: 4442
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 9:42 am
Location: disused action figure warehouse

Re: Should NASA turn Voyager I back around?

Postby AndyDufresne on Fri Jun 28, 2013 12:51 pm

jonesthecurl wrote:
Woodruff wrote:Every time we get an update from Voyager 1, it's history in the making:

http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2013/06/voyager-unexpected-region/


how odd. I thought the scientists had all banded together in a god-hating conspiracy to keep us ignorant. Don't tell me they're admitting they don't know something.


This is just a blip, Jonsey. Don't worry, the Secret Society of Scientists with Unknowable and Clandestine Knowledge (SSSUCK) will step in to correct things soon.


--Andy
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class AndyDufresne
 
Posts: 24919
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 8:22 pm
Location: A Banana Palm in Zihuatanejo

Re: Should NASA turn Voyager I back around?

Postby Funkyterrance on Fri Jun 28, 2013 1:45 pm

Ok, if this thread gets a bump then I'm bumping Bedknobs and Broomsticks again.
Image
User avatar
Colonel Funkyterrance
 
Posts: 2494
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 10:52 pm
Location: New Hampshire, USA

Re: Should NASA turn Voyager I back around?

Postby Woodruff on Fri Jun 28, 2013 4:49 pm

Funkyterrance wrote:Ok, if this thread gets a bump then I'm bumping Bedknobs and Broomsticks again.


You don't think the bump was relevant?
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Woodruff
 
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: Should NASA turn Voyager I back around?

Postby Funkyterrance on Fri Jun 28, 2013 5:21 pm

Yeah I suppose it is in a once-removed sort of way...
I saw an ad for the Bedknobs and Broomsticks 40th anniversary special edition Blu-Ray too today though.
Image
User avatar
Colonel Funkyterrance
 
Posts: 2494
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 10:52 pm
Location: New Hampshire, USA

Re: Should NASA turn Voyager I back around?

Postby tzor on Fri Jun 28, 2013 11:00 pm

patches70 wrote:It's not worth bothering with Voyager. A few quick calculations on the blue book value.


It's an almost unique item. You would be surprised what it would fetch at the antiques road show.
Image
User avatar
Cadet tzor
 
Posts: 4076
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 9:43 pm
Location: Long Island, NY, USA

Re: Should NASA turn Voyager I back around?

Postby WILLIAMS5232 on Fri Jun 28, 2013 11:34 pm

tzor wrote:
patches70 wrote:It's not worth bothering with Voyager. A few quick calculations on the blue book value.


It's an almost unique item. You would be surprised what it would fetch at the antiques road show.



the gold record alone could be worth hundreds if not thousands of dollars
Image
User avatar
Major WILLIAMS5232
 
Posts: 1838
Joined: Sun Aug 16, 2009 4:22 pm
Location: houston texas

Re: Should NASA turn Voyager I back around?

Postby john9blue on Sat Jun 29, 2013 12:06 am

the awesome thing about satellites is that they keep going when they run out of gas

also i can't believe i missed out on saxi's bellsprout/BITBBH gifs

you know the way to my heart, uncle sack see
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)
User avatar
Captain john9blue
 
Posts: 1268
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 6:18 pm
Location: FlutterChi-town

PreviousNext

Return to Practical Explanation about Next Life,

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users