Conquer Club

WWII - Eastern Front-statistic page 1 [Quenched]5000 finish

Care to peruse completed maps? Take a stroll through the Atlas.

Moderator: Cartographers

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Postby Geoster on Fri Aug 03, 2007 11:30 am

This probably won't be a popular suggestion, but I think the map was better before taking the neutrals down to 3. Granted, when I saw those 6s, I was like, "this map is totally unfair," but having had a chance to play some on both sides of the change, I think the map had a much more interesting feel with the 6s.

Having only 3 attractive territories meant there was alot of action in the West, but it was still possible for a player to build strength in Russia while most everybody else fought over the German armies. It's kind of like the players were a disorganized German force trying to regroup in hostile Russian terrain, or else they were a decimated Russian force fighting off Germans with inferior numbers. Now it plays like pretty much every other map. Moreover, having neutral 3s in your territories is actually an advantage over having enemy troops alot of the time, making the superior Russian bonuses seem a little unbalanced now.

My personal recommendation would be to make the Russian capitals start with neutral 5s. I think that would be the best balance point. But I don't know. Is there any support for this sentiment?

G
User avatar
Lieutenant Geoster
 
Posts: 18
Joined: Thu May 17, 2007 6:09 pm
Location: L.A.

Postby Qwert on Fri Aug 03, 2007 2:18 pm

Well geoster,you read what people say,and also i se same thing,people dont try to conquer Russian Country,and go only for German Country.
Image
NEW REVOLUTION-NEW RANKS PRESS THESE LINK viewtopic.php?f=471&t=47578&start=0
User avatar
Major Qwert
SoC Training Adviser
 
Posts: 9262
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 5:07 pm
Location: VOJVODINA

Postby Molacole on Sat Aug 04, 2007 7:20 am

=D> good job!
User avatar
Lieutenant Molacole
 
Posts: 552
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 8:19 am
Location: W 2.0 map by ZIM

Postby fireedud on Sat Aug 04, 2007 10:10 am

Congratz qwert
me have no sig
Cook fireedud
 
Posts: 1704
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 10:06 pm

Postby Qwert on Sat Aug 04, 2007 10:57 am

Thanks molacole and fireedud
Image
NEW REVOLUTION-NEW RANKS PRESS THESE LINK viewtopic.php?f=471&t=47578&start=0
User avatar
Major Qwert
SoC Training Adviser
 
Posts: 9262
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 5:07 pm
Location: VOJVODINA

Postby mno2go on Sat Aug 04, 2007 11:55 am

There's a spelling mistake: "Donets" should be "Donetsk" (note the k at the end) :) Also, "Tallin" has two Ns: "Tallinn" :)

But otherwise, seems like a great map, I'm just playing on it...
Last edited by mno2go on Sat Aug 04, 2007 2:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Private 1st Class mno2go
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 6:09 pm
Location: Paris, France

Postby RobinJ on Sat Aug 04, 2007 12:01 pm

OMG! I've just come back to visit the forums after a month off and this is the best thing I've seen yet. WELL DONE qwert! (And before page 150 as well! :shock: ) Sorry if this is a few days late but I'm just so happy! :D
nmhunate wrote:Speak English... It is the language that God wrote the bible in.


Highest Score: 2437
Highest Place: 84
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class RobinJ
 
Posts: 1901
Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2006 1:56 pm
Location: Northern Ireland

Postby Qwert on Sat Aug 04, 2007 5:46 pm

mno2go
There's a spelling mistake: "Donets" should be "Donetsk" (note the k at the end) Also, "Tallin" has two Ns: "Tallinn"

But otherwise, seems like a great map, I'm just playing on it...


Hmm,you new here,and you dont follow mine topic,
1.Donets and Donetsk is two diferent things.
2.As concerne of tallin,if you have time go back and you will find map with Russian names(Sarema is rusian name,and saaremma is original name,also Lvov is Lwow)All names in map is Russian translation to english,because all these terittory belong to USSr,
Image
NEW REVOLUTION-NEW RANKS PRESS THESE LINK viewtopic.php?f=471&t=47578&start=0
User avatar
Major Qwert
SoC Training Adviser
 
Posts: 9262
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 5:07 pm
Location: VOJVODINA

Postby mno2go on Sun Aug 05, 2007 2:23 pm

qwert wrote:Hmm,you new here,and you dont follow mine topic,
1.Donets and Donetsk is two diferent things.
2.As concerne of tallin,if you have time go back and you will find map with Russian names(Sarema is rusian name,and saaremma is original name,also Lvov is Lwow)All names in map is Russian translation to english,because all these terittory belong to USSr,


Yes, it's true. I didn't read the whole topic (a lot of pages :)) I guess in response:

1. If you're referring to the region of Donetsk, then it's known as Donbass. I am not too sure historically, but I believe it was known as that since the times of the USSR. Which Donets are you referring to?

2. Lwow is actually not Russian, but Polish. That name stuck from the times of the Polish and Lithuanian empires. The Russian name has always been Lvov, and Ukrainian is Lviv. However, I don't argue about Tallin :)
User avatar
Private 1st Class mno2go
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 6:09 pm
Location: Paris, France

Postby Qwert on Sun Aug 05, 2007 2:38 pm

Think man. Why olveys must be name of some country or town or region,some bigest battles will hepend on river to.
Image
NEW REVOLUTION-NEW RANKS PRESS THESE LINK viewtopic.php?f=471&t=47578&start=0
User avatar
Major Qwert
SoC Training Adviser
 
Posts: 9262
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 5:07 pm
Location: VOJVODINA

Postby mno2go on Mon Aug 06, 2007 3:41 am

Good point :)
User avatar
Private 1st Class mno2go
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 6:09 pm
Location: Paris, France

CONGRATZ

Postby MarVal on Wed Aug 08, 2007 7:39 am

    :-({|= CONGRATZ :-({|=


Finally we can play this amazing map!

Grtz
MarVal
Image highest score: 2157 (Major) / Verd ori'shya beskar'gam
ImageImage
User avatar
Corporal MarVal
 
Posts: 3823
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 4:45 pm
Location: De Veroveraars der Lage Landen

Postby boberz on Thu Aug 09, 2007 12:14 pm

yes well done qwert you deserved it

sorry about some of the tension between us before perhaps we could play on this map when i get back from my holiday in a couple of weeks
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class boberz
 
Posts: 864
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 12:21 pm

Postby Qwert on Thu Aug 09, 2007 2:58 pm

boberz



Joined: 03 Dec 2006
Posts: 742

Posted: 09 Aug 2007 17:14 Post subject:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

yes well done qwert you deserved it

sorry about some of the tension between us before perhaps we could play on this map when i get back from my holiday in a couple of weeks

Forget it,and enjoy in game.
Image
NEW REVOLUTION-NEW RANKS PRESS THESE LINK viewtopic.php?f=471&t=47578&start=0
User avatar
Major Qwert
SoC Training Adviser
 
Posts: 9262
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 5:07 pm
Location: VOJVODINA

Postby Timminz on Thu Aug 09, 2007 3:11 pm

Sorry if this has been brought up already, but the first few games I played on this map had 6 neutrals on each capital, and I just started in another one where there are only 3 on each. What happened?
User avatar
Captain Timminz
 
Posts: 5579
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 1:05 pm
Location: At the store

Postby Qwert on Thu Aug 09, 2007 3:27 pm

6 been very big for conquer,so i change to 3
Image
NEW REVOLUTION-NEW RANKS PRESS THESE LINK viewtopic.php?f=471&t=47578&start=0
User avatar
Major Qwert
SoC Training Adviser
 
Posts: 9262
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 5:07 pm
Location: VOJVODINA

Postby Timminz on Fri Aug 10, 2007 11:36 am

thanks.
User avatar
Captain Timminz
 
Posts: 5579
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 1:05 pm
Location: At the store

Postby Heimdall on Fri Aug 17, 2007 2:56 pm

I like the map, however I do not understand why Stalingrad and Rundstetd gets 5 armies while von Bock gets 4. Seems a bit unbalanced to me since von Bock connects to 4 other bonus regions while the other only connect to 2.

In a 6 player game, everyone is likely to end up with a bonus region each. Those in the middle are going to end-up the biggest targets.
User avatar
Lieutenant Heimdall
 
Posts: 556
Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2006 11:44 pm
Location: Vancouver!

Postby hulmey on Fri Aug 17, 2007 8:09 pm

simple question and it deserves a simple answer...Dont go for the middle continents :D

I always go for the bonus 2 continent because this gives you a natural route to taking the top right hand continent and then you will have 2 continents but only 2 entrances to defend 8)
[img]http://img801.imageshack.us/img801/9761/41922610151374166770386.jpg[/mg]
User avatar
Lieutenant hulmey
 
Posts: 3742
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 7:33 am
Location: Las Vegas

Postby Qwert on Thu Sep 20, 2007 4:36 pm

5000 games finished :!: :!:

These is a great succes :D :D :D :D :D
Image
NEW REVOLUTION-NEW RANKS PRESS THESE LINK viewtopic.php?f=471&t=47578&start=0
User avatar
Major Qwert
SoC Training Adviser
 
Posts: 9262
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 5:07 pm
Location: VOJVODINA

Postby Wisse on Fri Sep 21, 2007 5:14 am

i have to say your map has a great gameplay :)
Image Image
User avatar
Sergeant Wisse
 
Posts: 4448
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2006 2:59 pm
Location: The netherlands, gelderland, epe

Previous

Return to The Atlas

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users