Conquer Club, a free online multiplayer variation of a popular world domination board game.
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/
IR1SH ACE wrote:alstergren wrote:Woodruff wrote:Frankly, this was a soft ruling, so you should just be happy not to get pounded in the ass like you deserved.
LOL. As I said, I'm fine with it. Just intrigued. No need for ass pounding comment cupcake.
yup a very soft ruling...you will be free to return to your ways in a months time...but the CCCW will be watching...
alstergren wrote:king achilles wrote:After discussing and reviewing this with the other hunters, we have concluded that alstergren was aware of what he was doing in joining these games with new recruits. In spite of the few games presented as evidence, taking into consideration his knowledge of the farming rule, his past, and his awareness of his actions, this report results in a disciplinary action where he will be stopped from joining games with new recruits for a certain period. And to make this fully possible, he has been blocked from joining games with any new recruits for a month.
Wow!
Two cents:
1. This is indeed unprecendented since past farming violations have focused on a relative high share of NR games (%-wise and time frames having varied from case to case). But now, (i) few games, (ii) being aware of playing NRs and (iii) knowledge of the rule is enough for a warning. Normally one would expect that not having bothered to read the rules wouldn't be an excuse. And apparently an effort to follow the rules/past decisions (as they were) is something that is an aggrevating factor. That really doesn't make sense to me, especially since joining a few games (everyone knows exactly who/what he/she is doing when joining a game) was explicitly said to be ok when the rule was announced. If this is followed consequently, it is very easy to run foul of this anti-NR "farming" rule. In fact, it seems more like an anti-NR "playing" rule reading this.
2. But I'm fine with this. Don't mind the drama. Recall "my" de facto double turns that also caused a change to the CC programming....
hmsps wrote:A good call? the judgement says nothing nor does it really give any punishment. Its as weak as water and why am i not surprisedowenshooter wrote:Chariot of Fire wrote:Why not become a writer instead.
I like this
i love how he comes in, makes a sound judgement, then resorts to this stuff again... all in all, a good call on this case...-el Jesus negro
just lol, he keeps his rank and points purely by playing NR's and low rankers if you cant see that then you have my pity.anonymus wrote:hmsps wrote:A good call? the judgement says nothing nor does it really give any punishment. Its as weak as water and why am i not surprisedowenshooter wrote:Chariot of Fire wrote:Why not become a writer instead.
I like this
i love how he comes in, makes a sound judgement, then resorts to this stuff again... all in all, a good call on this case...-el Jesus negro
still is one of the better players on the site,
/
Woodruff wrote:Clearly, Alstergren can do whatever the f*ck he wants. His spurious report against GENERAL, recognized by King Achilles as such, resulted in...nothing, not even a formal warning. This site is really starting to suck.
owenshooter wrote:i have never understood how they are so rabid about enforcing forum rules, even UNWRITTEN RULES, but do little to nothing about cheating that affects the leader board... team CC has lost it's luster... when you use volunteers, often times you get what you pay for...-0
