Re: Tracking a Player's Highest Score
Posted: Mon Jun 02, 2008 3:28 pm
I also use my sig as a place holder for my personal best.
Conquer Club, a free online multiplayer variation of a popular world domination board game.
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/
Timminz wrote:only when you change it. Unless you could code something that checks your score, compares it to your highest, and then alters an off-site image, which you link as your sig.
Herakilla wrote:Timminz wrote:only when you change it. Unless you could code something that checks your score, compares it to your highest, and then alters an off-site image, which you link as your sig.
you make it sound so simple
Yeah, but you can't really sort the personal best with other players, right?THE ARMY wrote:usually people just post in there "interest" or "occupation" zone their personal best, just look at mine for an example
If someone's particularly disbelieving they can check scores over time with Map Rankletitrock wrote:Yeah, but you can't really sort the personal best with other players, right?THE ARMY wrote:usually people just post in there "interest" or "occupation" zone their personal best, just look at mine for an example
No disrespect to anyone but anybody can just type any number in personal best and posted there.
The problem with any of these high score scripts, like Map Rank, is that they aren't 100% accurate because of the corrupt game logs from a while ago. If you can calculate attendance and put it on a person's profile, surely it would be easy to calculate their highest score as well? I think this is a great suggestion, a scoreboard would be nice but I think just having it on someone's profile would be easy and very useful.ManBungalow wrote:If someone's particularly disbelieving they can check scores over time with Map Rankletitrock wrote:Yeah, but you can't really sort the personal best with other players, right?THE ARMY wrote:usually people just post in there "interest" or "occupation" zone their personal best, just look at mine for an example
No disrespect to anyone but anybody can just type any number in personal best and posted there.
Very true. MapRank is off from my actual score by over 200 points.gameplayer wrote:The problem with any of these high score scripts, like Map Rank, is that they aren't 100% accurate because of the corrupt game logs from a while agoManBungalow wrote:If someone's particularly disbelieving they can check scores over time with Map Rankletitrock wrote:Yeah, but you can't really sort the personal best with other players, right?THE ARMY wrote:usually people just post in there "interest" or "occupation" zone their personal best, just look at mine for an example
No disrespect to anyone but anybody can just type any number in personal best and posted there.
Correct on the corrupt game logs.... except... how exactly is the site supposed to calculate the high score if there are missing logs..?gameplayer wrote:The problem with any of these high score scripts, like Map Rank, is that they aren't 100% accurate because of the corrupt game logs from a while ago. If you can calculate attendance and put it on a person's profile, surely it would be easy to calculate their highest score as well? I think this is a great suggestion, a scoreboard would be nice but I think just having it on someone's profile would be easy and very useful.ManBungalow wrote:If someone's particularly disbelieving they can check scores over time with Map Rankletitrock wrote:Yeah, but you can't really sort the personal best with other players, right?THE ARMY wrote:usually people just post in there "interest" or "occupation" zone their personal best, just look at mine for an example
No disrespect to anyone but anybody can just type any number in personal best and posted there.
Shouldn't the difference a Map Rank current score and an ACTUAL current score be consistent (assuming no more logs are lost)?chipv wrote:Correct on the corrupt game logs.... except... how exactly is the site supposed to calculate the high score if there are missing logs..?
Answers on a postcard please.
Absolutely correct with the exception that active terminator kills are not counted, only completed games so you may get deviation if the terminator game has not completed.PepperJack wrote:
Shouldn't the difference a Map Rank current score and an ACTUAL current score be consistent (assuming no more logs are lost)?
No, this will still be wrong if you are missing logs where you have won points immediately after the high score point.If that is true an all time high list can be built by running people through the MRGL special sauce API (or whatever the proper jargon is).
Example: I know my high is 2257. MRGL shows my high as 2249. That is a difference of 8.
MRGL shows me currently at 1967. I am currently 1975. Also 8.
So define the difference and apply it to the score chart that MRGL uses.
I think that works and is relatively succinct.
Yes. This could also be done starting from any time after Feb as that was when the logs went missing.lancehoch wrote:Would it be possible to set up the max score to not take into account past high scores? By that I mean, if/when it is added, the then current score is set as the high (if above 1000, else 1000 is set as the high) and this is only changed if the score goes above this high score.
so basically this^^^ is the only possible way for it to happen, because of the missing game logs? I still think that would be better than nothing. You could just add a little note: High Score(after February 2008) xxxxchipv wrote:Yes. This could also be done starting from any time after Feb as that was when the logs went missing.lancehoch wrote:Would it be possible to set up the max score to not take into account past high scores? By that I mean, if/when it is added, the then current score is set as the high (if above 1000, else 1000 is set as the high) and this is only changed if the score goes above this high score.
I could actually add this this to Map Rank if I included a relative score feature.
i.e. if you change the chart timescale then the first point starts at 1000 and calculation starts there.
For any time after the logs went missing, this would then have no errors but of course ignores any previous high score.
So of course possible from the site too, but again it would ignore previous high scores.
Ok. It's a pity because were it not for Terminator games, a full rescore would be able to recover all of the missing points.gameplayer wrote:so basically this^^^ is the only possible way for it to happen, because of the missing game logs? I still think that would be better than nothing. You could just add a little note: High Score(after February 2008) xxxxchipv wrote:Yes. This could also be done starting from any time after Feb as that was when the logs went missing.lancehoch wrote:Would it be possible to set up the max score to not take into account past high scores? By that I mean, if/when it is added, the then current score is set as the high (if above 1000, else 1000 is set as the high) and this is only changed if the score goes above this high score.
I could actually add this this to Map Rank if I included a relative score feature.
i.e. if you change the chart timescale then the first point starts at 1000 and calculation starts there.
For any time after the logs went missing, this would then have no errors but of course ignores any previous high score.
So of course possible from the site too, but again it would ignore previous high scores.
I agree my highest rank was 4 small points from lieutenant but when I had a little/major drop I would have liked to remind people I was not just some private...Rocketry wrote:I searched for this and couldn't find it, so here goes...
Concise description:Specifics:
- In a players profile, could there be something to indicate the highest score and rank ever achieved?
Rocket
- So, in addition to current rank, score, attendence etc. Just underneath that lot. Just a nice additional feature.