Conquer Club

Symmetry wrote:Weird stuff, a magazine for a group called the "Son's of Thunder" turned up on my doormat, apparently for a previous occupant. They kind of sound like a cult. I've dealt with a fair few weird Christian denominations in my time, and some of their "love" is pretty much indistinguishable from virulent hatred.

Any of you guys heard of them?

Symmetry wrote:

fadedpsychosis wrote:

Symmetry wrote:

fadedpsychosis wrote:

Symmetry wrote: And yet I feel that this argument applies more to your logic than mine. Clearly I'm talking about a Christian hate group, yet you seem to feel that this means that I think all Christians are members of a hate group, or that it's not possible to be a Christian hate group. I disagree with your logic on this Psychosis.

not at all... from my standpoint to be a member of the human race is to be a member of a hate group... from your definition anyway.

Symmetry wrote:In these guy's case, it's more of a tautology. They are Christian, thus they hate.

I read this to mean that they hate, therefore they are a hate group. my point was simply that all humans with the capacity for emotion hate (so I suppose I should exclude schizos from the hate group list?)

I have no idea what you mean by this, can you clarify? You've deleted my arguments leading up to this, so I do wonder whether you accepted them, or wish them forgotten, or whether there's something else here.

I'd rather you be up front about what you dislike.

I deleted the extra because it was... well, extra. If you want I can re-quote absolutely everything up to this point, but I was trying to make it easy to see what I was talking about... if you think I'd

Symmetry wrote:wish them forgotten

I probably wouldn't be quoting in the first place...

anyway, my entire point is this: you use bad logic to reinforce your personal ideology which is what I personally hate most about politicians and religious fanatics the most... so I hate groups, does that make me a hate group?

You seem to hate my personal ideology. Can you outline it for me? If it is your entire point, that is.

fadedpsychosis wrote:

Symmetry wrote:

fadedpsychosis wrote:
anyway, my entire point is this: you use bad logic to reinforce your personal ideology which is what I personally hate most about politicians and religious fanatics the most... so I hate groups, does that make me a hate group?

You seem to hate my personal ideology. Can you outline it for me? If it is your entire point, that is.

no

I don't care about your personal ideology... it's your personal ideology

my point is don't use bad logic
(sorry, underlined was the best I could do)

Symmetry wrote:Sons, not son's. Apologies to anybody that thought that was the odd thing about them.

thegreekdog wrote:I received a visit from Jehovah's witnesses who handed me two brochures. The first was about how I could live forever and the second was about how I should stop watching porn. I didn't read them so I'm not sure if they were mutually exclusive.

Symmetry wrote:

fadedpsychosis wrote:

Symmetry wrote:

fadedpsychosis wrote:
anyway, my entire point is this: you use bad logic to reinforce your personal ideology which is what I personally hate most about politicians and religious fanatics the most... so I hate groups, does that make me a hate group?

You seem to hate my personal ideology. Can you outline it for me? If it is your entire point, that is.

no

I don't care about your personal ideology... it's your personal ideology

my point is don't use bad logic
(sorry, underlined was the best I could do)

If your logic led you to a hatred of my personal ideology, you could at least outline what you think that ideology is, however little you care for it.

fadedpsychosis wrote:

Symmetry wrote:

fadedpsychosis wrote:

Symmetry wrote:

fadedpsychosis wrote:
anyway, my entire point is this: you use bad logic to reinforce your personal ideology which is what I personally hate most about politicians and religious fanatics the most... so I hate groups, does that make me a hate group?

You seem to hate my personal ideology. Can you outline it for me? If it is your entire point, that is.

no

I don't care about your personal ideology... it's your personal ideology

my point is don't use bad logic
(sorry, underlined was the best I could do)

If your logic led you to a hatred of my personal ideology, you could at least outline what you think that ideology is, however little you care for it.

you don't listen do you? let me say it again... I. Don't. Care.
your ideology is your own personal business.
I don't care about it, I don't know anything about it, I don't want to know.
I don't hate your ideology either. what I hate is you using bad logic to push it.

if you want to learn the difference between good and bad logic go read a book or take a class, I haven't the patience or inclination to try to teach one who doesn't listen.

Symmetry wrote:

fadedpsychosis wrote:

Symmetry wrote:

fadedpsychosis wrote:

Symmetry wrote:

fadedpsychosis wrote:
anyway, my entire point is this: you use bad logic to reinforce your personal ideology which is what I personally hate most about politicians and religious fanatics the most... so I hate groups, does that make me a hate group?

You seem to hate my personal ideology. Can you outline it for me? If it is your entire point, that is.

no

I don't care about your personal ideology... it's your personal ideology

my point is don't use bad logic
(sorry, underlined was the best I could do)

If your logic led you to a hatred of my personal ideology, you could at least outline what you think that ideology is, however little you care for it.

you don't listen do you? let me say it again... I. Don't. Care.
your ideology is your own personal business.
I don't care about it, I don't know anything about it, I don't want to know.
I don't hate your ideology either. what I hate is you using bad logic to push it.

if you want to learn the difference between good and bad logic go read a book or take a class, I haven't the patience or inclination to try to teach one who doesn't listen.

So, what was the ideology that you hated? Or were you just hating the rhetoric I use?

fadedpsychosis wrote:

Symmetry wrote:
So, what was the ideology that you hated? Or were you just hating the rhetoric I use?

it was the rhetoric, if you want to call it that... I call it bad logic. I don't care what you or anyone believes, but be honest and correct when you try to persuade others... if you read close what I said, it was the way politicians and religious fanatics use bad logic that I hate (I even bolded it in the quote above for you) as you have shown you're not a religious fanatic, I can only pray you have no political aspirations...

fadedpsychosis wrote:also, for more clarity, it was the word tautology that really set me off, followed by the line "They are Christian, thus they hate."
calling a logical fallacy a tautology is rather offensive to me.

jonesthecurl wrote:

fadedpsychosis wrote:also, for more clarity, it was the word tautology that really set me off, followed by the line "They are Christian, thus they hate."
calling a logical fallacy a tautology is rather offensive to me.

His point (or so I thought anyway) was that it seemed a tautology to THEM -i.e. THEY think that hate is a necessaary part of being a Christian. I don't believe Sym meant that he agrees.
Or am I reading it wrong?

Phatscotty wrote:

Symmetry wrote:Weird stuff, a magazine for a group called the "Son's of Thunder" turned up on my doormat, apparently for a previous occupant. They kind of sound like a cult. I've dealt with a fair few weird Christian denominations in my time, and some of their "love" is pretty much indistinguishable from virulent hatred.

Any of you guys heard of them?

and????? where is the hate??? I don't get it, unless it's just something you wanted to include in the title in order to deal with your own hate issue?

I was expecting something like this...from a real hate group
Democratic Official Allan Brauer Wishes Death on Ted Cruz Aide’s Children

Kansas professor issues death wish upon children of NRA members

Did this Christian group issue a death wish to you Symm? Or threaten to cut off your head? What kind of hate are you talking about?

Symmetry wrote:

fadedpsychosis wrote:

Symmetry wrote:
So, what was the ideology that you hated? Or were you just hating the rhetoric I use?

it was the rhetoric, if you want to call it that... I call it bad logic. I don't care what you or anyone believes, but be honest and correct when you try to persuade others... if you read close what I said, it was the way politicians and religious fanatics use bad logic that I hate (I even bolded it in the quote above for you) as you have shown you're not a religious fanatic, I can only pray you have no political aspirations...

I don't get your take on this, nor why you would want to pray for that. Are you saying that you'd prefer these guys in office?

hahaha3hahaha wrote:As already mentioned, a Christian hate group is unable to exist. It's like a "Christian evolutionist", a term people liberally throw around that doesn't actually make any sense whatsoever. The two terms both conflict themselves, and in reality cannot exist.

jonesthecurl wrote:Then how many Christians do you think there are?

hahaha3hahaha wrote:

chang50 wrote:

hahaha3hahaha wrote:As already mentioned, a Christian hate group is unable to exist. It's like a "Christian evolutionist", a term people liberally throw around that doesn't actually make any sense whatsoever. The two terms both conflict themselves, and in reality cannot exist.

You mean 'Christian evolutionists' like the Pope,and the Archbishop of Canterbury,or come to think of it the vast majority of self-identifying Christians?

"Vast majority" is a gross overstatement...
Secondly the scriptures clearly state that man was created by God, not that man has slowly evolved from bacteria and other species. It is fairly difficult, if not impossible, to claim to be a follower of Christ if you believe in evolution. Much like it is quite difficult to claim to be an atheist if you believe in Jesus Christ as Lord.

macbone wrote:Oh, wait, Symmetry, was it the Sons of Thundr [sic]? That's a completely different group, and they are definitely a hate group.

Here's the anti-gay group's Wikipedia page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sons_of_Th ... _Church%29

And their website: http://sonsofthundr.com/

They're apparently very liberal when it comes to punctuation and capitalization. =)

The Sons of Thunder, on the other hand, seem ok. They describe themselves as Christian mystics, which sounds kind of funky.

macbone wrote:Oh, wait, Symmetry, was it the Sons of Thundr [sic]? That's a completely different group, and they are definitely a hate group.

Here's the anti-gay group's Wikipedia page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sons_of_Th ... _Church%29

And their website: http://sonsofthundr.com/

They're apparently very liberal when it comes to punctuation and capitalization. =)

The Sons of Thunder, on the other hand, seem ok. They describe themselves as Christian mystics, which sounds kind of funky.