Conquer Club

nietzche wrote:This is a disrespect for the game

nietzche's signature wrote:nietzche once chased a milk carton.

I think your sig is the real disrespect to the game

nietzsche wrote:I personally think it's a disrespect for this game. [/size]

nietzsche your FACE is disrespectful to everyone that looks at it.

If anyone says anything about anyones mom this'll get moved to the flame wars, if you're lucky.

Don't hate the player, hate the game. I think the game, in this case the map, is flawed and should be looked at harder.

MeDeFe wrote:

The1exile wrote:

MeDeFe wrote:That game's nothing.

Compared to 45500?

Exactly.

3 hours and it will be a 2 man game.

debra79 wrote:Omg, 45500 is insane!!! Who the hell has that much time or patience to play a game that's lasted nigh on a year?! I can't think of anything less satisfying or rewarding

Eh, I have a sequential no cards game going on right now that's reaching it's 100th round soon, has lasted about a month and a half, and only one person has been wiped out, the highest ranking player. It's quite rewarding imho.

If you want adrenaline pumping game play a freestyle rt.

i think that's insane how can six people have enough time to play 180 days straight they must be total geeks who spend their whole lives watching a flickering computer screen and wishing that they culd f*ck their computer. and i hav one thing to say "WHO GIVES A F*%K%^G RATS ASS!!!"

cpl.patten wrote:i think that's insane how can six people have enough time to play 180 days straight they must be total geeks who spend their whole lives watching a flickering computer screen and wishing that they culd f*ck their computer. and i hav one thing to say "WHO GIVES A F*%K%^G RATS ASS!!!"

I agree.

i don't like long games. they either become stagnant like this one or somebody ends up losing out in which case there are hard feelings. long games are best avoided if possible IMO

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:

cpl.patten wrote:i think that's insane how can six people have enough time to play 180 days straight they must be total geeks who spend their whole lives watching a flickering computer screen and wishing that they culd f*ck their computer. and i hav one thing to say "WHO GIVES A F*%K%^G RATS ASS!!!"

I agree.

I mean that JR guy is a loser. He sucks. He needs to stick to team games.

This game is Conquer Club's own representation of Mutually assured destruction...if one person attacks then they are placed firmly back at square one and a domino effect ensues. However, it would be a good testing grounds for the so-called "random" nature of the dice...I voted no by the by.

you don't have the right to close down their game!

its none of your business unless your in the game

hammockboy1 wrote:you don't have the right to close down their game!

its none of your business unless your in the game

I agree

I think this protest is just about done.

corner G wrote:I think this protest is just about done.

I agree

Johnny is a shameless yes-man.

if they reach the game's army limit let me know...

how much time do you think it would take for a 900 vs 900 battle in auto-attack?

The1exile wrote:Johnny is a shameless yes-man.

I agree...beat you to it, JR...

I do have one additional thing to say. I am impressed with their patience to continue this game at this point. Like the old saying goes...patience is a virtue...obviously, these guys are virtuous.

papadopo wrote:if they reach the game's army limit let me know...

how much time do you think it would take for a 900 vs 900 battle in auto-attack?

I agree

jaybebo wrote:I do have one additional thing to say. I am impressed with their patience to continue this game at this point. Like the old saying goes...patience is a virtue...obviously, these guys are virtuous.

I agree

jeez why is this thread STILL flashing orange at me? GET OVER IT.

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:

jaybebo wrote:I do have one additional thing to say. I am impressed with their patience to continue this game at this point. Like the old saying goes...patience is a virtue...obviously, these guys are virtuous.

I agree

No I agree