Conquer Club

White Moose wrote:

Bruceswar wrote:Honestly Hardy why even post this? Do you think anybody does not know he can beat people once in awhile? I do not see the need to post this.

Agreed.

While it is rather needless, this thread warms my heart. It's just too cute. Jeff Hardy rushing in to defend the honour of his sweet Herpes. I predict a hollywood representation of it, starring Hugh Grant, coming next fall.

Jeff Hardy wrote:

RiskTycoon wrote:pfft ... stupid silly list .... what a waste of forum space ....

that list is more important than your post

I think you are delusional my friend .. if your nose gets any further up his butt we are gonna have to tie a rope to your legs ...

if you guys want to flame me (or herpes for that matter) then take it to flame wars

I'm sure if we keep it up they will move this idiotic post to flame wars for us ... give it time

Jeff Hardy wrote:if you guys want to flame me (or herpes for that matter) then take it to flame wars

Good advice.

And, if you'd like a peanut-butter sandwich, put some PB between 2 pieces of bread.

Timminz wrote: And, if you'd like a peanut-butter sandwich, put some PB between 2 pieces of bread.

I personally think it is rather interesting.

The way he got to major is by specializing on a new map in freestyle mostly against people who do not play freestyle and do not have clickies. (why he starts private games)

But in my opinion, clickies are perfectly fair although I do not myself have them. But everyone who hears about them either gets them, or does not because of software incompatibility. (or they think they are unfair)

So he is getting to his very high rank by playing against people who do not use enhancing software with his clickies, and those people have not had a chance to get them, or did have a chance and decided not to and deserved to be beaten.

I really think that he is right. Farming against people you are sure do not have clickies and do not know how to play freestyle is better than farming people who might be multis, since he would beat a new recruit and a non-freestyle person either way.

Jeff Hardy wrote:

Timminz wrote: And, if you'd like a peanut-butter sandwich, put some PB between 2 pieces of bread.

Sorry. Let me rephrase that.

What I meant to say was, "Duh. And if you have a question, take it to the Q&A forum."

Jeff Hardy wrote:* are games with a former conquerer in them

Don't you mean, games with a current conquerer in them

No, I'm not referring to KH...

200 out of 2300? Is anyone impressed that he accidentally ended up playing 10% of his games against real players while he was trying to farm?

*edit*
And then he has a markedly substandard record in those games. (MapRank again, because I'll be damned if I trust your hand picked selections). Anyone who can't win 75% of his share of games against good players is not a good player.

e_i_pi wrote:

Jeff Hardy wrote:* are games with a former conquerer in them

Don't you mean, games with a current conquerer in them

No, I'm not referring to KH...

most of the * games were against jr and blitz

BaldAdonis wrote:200 out of 2300? Is anyone impressed that he accidentally ended up playing 10% of his games against real players while he was trying to farm?

*edit*
And then he has a markedly substandard record in those games. (MapRank again, because I'll be damned if I trust your hand picked selections). Anyone who can't win 75% of his share of games against good players is not a good player.

That depends how you define a good player. Also, if player A wins even 50% of the time against good players, that by definition makes him a good player because it proves that he can hang with them. He may not be *great* but he is good.

As for the game list, I can pick out any mediocre striper who has played thousands of games, go through his game history, and post many games where he beat a good opponent.

Fruitcake wrote: Of course heprs, you just keep trying to divert attention away from the reality. And that is that you are a cheat.

Oh? The infliction in your words makes you sound so serious and certain. I would suggest that you bring whatever you have that is so concrete into C&A where like claims get sorted out. Although I know you won't because your accusations are empty. Instead you'll just tuck your tail in between your legs and go back to being a grump and a sour old grape fruit, fumbling over your own feet. Then when an argument gets turned upside down on you next time you'll just resort to yelling... "Cheat"!, "A cheat"!, "everyone look, I found one"! That's just a bleak view into your future, but I'm sure it will prove to be much more meaningless than that.

excuse my ignorance, what is a "clickie"?

it's a group of farmers that only hang out together in their own clique .....

nah it's a script they use in freestyle .. (I think) lol

RiskTycoon wrote:it's a group of farmers that only hang out together in their own clique .....

nah it's a script they use in freestyle .. (I think) lol

i use it in seq too

King_Herpes wrote:

Fruitcake wrote: Of course heprs, you just keep trying to divert attention away from the reality. And that is that you are a cheat.

Oh? The infliction in your words makes you sound so serious and certain. I would suggest that you bring whatever you have that is so concrete into C&A where like claims get sorted out. Although I know you won't because your accusations are empty. Instead you'll just tuck your tail in between your legs and go back to being a grump and a sour old grape fruit, fumbling over your own feet. Then when an argument gets turned upside down on you next time you'll just resort to yelling... "Cheat"!, "A cheat"!, "everyone look, I found one"! That's just a bleak view into your future, but I'm sure it will prove to be much more meaningless than that.

keep talking heprs, just keep talking. Kind of sums you up.