Conquer Club

Posted: **Sat May 30, 2009 2:27 pm**

KLOBBER wrote:and it is from earlier today.
.

Posted: **Sat May 30, 2009 2:27 pm**

KLOBBER wrote:Still no scriptural or logical attempts at refutation. Acceptance is implied.

i hope you don't pull that with the women in your life

you might end up in jail

Posted: **Sat May 30, 2009 2:27 pm**

"...you didn't actually put the atheist worldview in there...."

Sure I put it in there.

Posted: **Sat May 30, 2009 2:28 pm**

SultanOfSurreal wrote:
KLOBBER wrote:Still no scriptural or logical attempts at refutation. Acceptance is implied.

i hope you don't pull that with the women in your life

you might end up in jail[/quote]
Hehehe.

"STOP! NO! NO!"
"That's not very logical, let's continue."

Posted: **Sat May 30, 2009 2:32 pm**

Snorri1234 wrote:
SultanOfSurreal wrote:
KLOBBER wrote:Still no scriptural or logical attempts at refutation. Acceptance is implied.

i hope you don't pull that with the women in your life

you might end up in jail

Hehehe.

"STOP! NO! NO!"
"That's not very logical, let's continue."

hey man if you can't form a coherent objection to his 8 Points of Rape then you're clearly asking for it

plus you shouldn't have dressed so sexy

Posted: **Sat May 30, 2009 2:32 pm**

The atheist is demonstrating a transparently desperate desire to change the subject of this thread. Please make a note of this fact, and refer to the original post, of which there has been no logical or scriptural attempt at refutation, only a series of silly, trolling, vulgar, and flaming posts.

This speaks volumes about the atheist's failure to apprehend the meanings of the two simple points in the OP and of their conclusion, as well as his utter inability to offer any real refutation to any of it. The more desperate attempts the atheist makes at distracting the readers of this thread from its subject, the more obvious these facts become.

Carry on....

8-)

Posted: **Sat May 30, 2009 2:35 pm**

KLOBBER wrote:only a series of silly, trolling, vulgar, and flaming posts.

Irony: something about things that are made of iron.

Posted: **Sat May 30, 2009 2:37 pm**

KLOBBER wrote:blah blah blah

i'm flattered that you expect me to spend the time to write a lengthy dissertation refuting centuries-old canards which you will neither read nor understand, and to which you will respond in exactly the same way as if i had just made a joke about the gordon fisherman raping you, but i have better things to do. like make fun of your increasingly desperate attempts to provoke anything more than blithe derision out of everyone who posts here

ps seriously, how do you feel about fishsticks

Posted: **Sat May 30, 2009 3:08 pm**

Still no attempts at refutation. Typical.

Posted: **Sat May 30, 2009 6:16 pm**

KLOBBER wrote:Still no attempts at refutation. Typical.

And deservedly so. You simply do not deserve refutation any more than a box of rocks deserves one.

Posted: **Sat May 30, 2009 6:30 pm**

Woodruff wrote:
KLOBBER wrote:Still no attempts at refutation. Typical.

...You simply do not deserve refutation any more than a box of rocks deserves one.

Facts cannot be successfully refuted -- that is the case here.

You are unable to refute -- you can only make personal attacks.

Posted: **Sat May 30, 2009 6:30 pm**

KLOBBER wrote:Facts cannot be successfully refuted. That is the case here.

The next time you post a fact is likely to be the first.

Posted: **Sat May 30, 2009 6:33 pm**

No attempt at refutation, only failed attempts at insult. Typical.

Posted: **Sat May 30, 2009 6:36 pm**

KLOBBER wrote:No attempt at refutation, only failed attempts at insult. Typical.

True, you didn't provide an attempt at refutation. And yes, you are typical of a troll. Good points.

Posted: **Sat May 30, 2009 6:39 pm**

I'm reading through this topic and find it difficult to take anything Klobber says seriously...

The second statement you made along with your responses are so comical I almost feel like the three or four of you planned this whole thread out as a mockery of typical debates on this website...

If so- bravo, I chuckled quite a bit :lol:

Posted: **Sat May 30, 2009 6:43 pm**

No refutations, just silly insult attempts.

I will gladly brave your impotent and inaccurate attempts at insult, so long as each one bumps the truth to the top of the list.

Posted: **Sat May 30, 2009 6:49 pm**

KLOBBER wrote:The atheist is demonstrating a transparently desperate desire to change the subject of this thread. Please make a note of this fact, and refer to the original post, of which there has been no logical or scriptural attempt at refutation, only a series of silly, trolling, vulgar, and flaming posts.

This speaks volumes about the atheist's failure to apprehend the meanings of the two simple points in the OP and of their conclusion, as well as his utter inability to offer any real refutation to any of it. The more desperate attempts the atheist makes at distracting the readers of this thread from its subject, the more obvious these facts become.

Carry on....

This is a fantastic statement.

Someone who repeatedly flaunts his 'mathematical prowess' throughout the forums states that the comments of two or three individuals on a forum who have no intent on taking Klobber seriously (who in their right mind would?) "speaks volumes about the atheist's failure to apprehend the meanings...".

Yeah, Klobber, volumes. I'm sure you've done enough work with numbers (an introductory statistics course would be enough...) to know that the blatantly apathetic responses of these individuals speak nothing of 15% of the world's population.

Here's ALL the refutation anyone needs to prove your idiotic (not to mention strongly lacking any comprehension for world views...) statement:

Neurotransmitters. Period.

[/thread]. GG.

edit: Here's another fabulous hole in your argument: your utilizing 'scripture' as something that needs to be refuted.

Come on, seriously? Biblical scholars themselves refute the damn thing.

You want us to prove wrong a book written by a bunch of different religious people who made up stories and facts to support their beliefs that has been edited by similar individuals over time? You really cannot expect anyone (especially someone who has already grown out of accepting fables as fact) to take you seriously when you make a thread like this.

You're just asking to be mocked and trolled.

Posted: **Sat May 30, 2009 7:06 pm**

Well that was thoroughly incoherent.

Posted: **Sat May 30, 2009 7:41 pm**

KLOBBER wrote:Well that was thoroughly incoherent.

You're easily the biggest hypocrite on this forum :lol:

Posted: **Sat May 30, 2009 7:58 pm**

Still no valid refutations -- only impotent attempts at personal insult. How sad.

Posted: **Sat May 30, 2009 8:22 pm**

KLOBBER wrote:WOOPWOOP! I'M A TROLL!

Posted: **Sat May 30, 2009 8:35 pm**

Snorri and the cerealsultan say this is a 450 year old argument that has been debunked. So why not post how it was debunked? It sounds like a logical premise to me, and i'm sure a refutation would be more interesting than any of the catty, spammish replies that i've heard so far. What are you two scared of?

Honibaz

Posted: **Sat May 30, 2009 8:49 pm**

b.k. barunt wrote:Snorri and the cerealsultan say this is a 450 year old argument that has been debunked. So why not post how it was debunked? It sounds like a logical premise to me, and i'm sure a refutation would be more interesting than any of the catty, spammish replies that i've heard so far. What are you two scared of?

Honibaz

We're not actually scared. If you had made this thread I would've responded and it would've made for an interesting discussion.

It's just that we either mock or don't respond to such an infuriating troll. Hell, you would respond the same to prowler and his shit posts.

Posted: **Sat May 30, 2009 8:52 pm**

I mean, if we had responded to his post he would bring up how he was smarter than all of us and had college-level courses about this and that we were all just highschool kids who didn't know about how college tells you smart things and such.

Not that I'm saying it wouldn't be hilarious, just saying that I don't want to waste my time again. For more of KLOBBER's antics, check the Logic Dictates God exists thread. I guarantee it will give you a chuckle or two.

Posted: **Sat May 30, 2009 8:53 pm**

Snorri1234 wrote:...We're not actually scared....

Not actually scared, huh? Just pretending to be scared?

Very convincing!

Conquer Club

God is the Original Personal Archetype

Re: God is the Original Personal Archetype

Re: God is the Original Personal Archetype

Re: God is the Original Personal Archetype

Re: God is the Original Personal Archetype

Re: God is the Original Personal Archetype

Re: God is the Original Personal Archetype

Re: God is the Original Personal Archetype

Re: God is the Original Personal Archetype

Re: God is the Original Personal Archetype

Re: God is the Original Personal Archetype

Re: God is the Original Personal Archetype

Re: God is the Original Personal Archetype

Re: God is the Original Personal Archetype

Re: God is the Original Personal Archetype

Re: God is the Original Personal Archetype

Re: God is the Original Personal Archetype

Re: God is the Original Personal Archetype

Re: God is the Original Personal Archetype

Re: God is the Original Personal Archetype

Re: God is the Original Personal Archetype

Re: God is the Original Personal Archetype

Re: God is the Original Personal Archetype

Re: God is the Original Personal Archetype

Re: God is the Original Personal Archetype

Re: God is the Original Personal Archetype