Conquer Club

[curtseys]

Minister Masket wrote:

johnnyrotten wrote:The longest thread thread is not spam. This is why it is infinitely better than S*****t.

Yeah sure, and I'm the Queen of Sheba.

YOU'RE THE QUEEN OF SHEBA!??!?!?

hecter wrote:

strike wolf wrote:

Iliad wrote:

johnnyrotten wrote:The longest thread thread is not spam. This is why it is infinitely better than S*****t.

While definitely they are two very different threads, neither can really deny that it has spam. Spam hidden amongst the conversations about anything that strikes the fancy of the people, but there's spam in both nonetheless.

You may want to get off your high horse and understand the concept behind both of the threads is the same.

Umm...I thought those guys at the other thread deny wanting to be the longest thread. that it "wasn't their intention".

It isn't out intention, but what the longest thread thread is now isn't simply being or becoming the longest thread. It's something different, something more. If it wasn't, you guys would just be sitting there making post of after post that meant nothing, such as "2308944u890sdafkljasd;lfkja".

Oh dang why didn't I think of making random spam to make it longer.

Of course we don't just wnat to make it the longest. We want to be able t omake it the longest without just randomly spamming the hell out of it. So that if, I mean WHEN, we accomplish our goal and people come to look at it (possibly out of bored curiousity) we can have a level of pride in what we have created.

ANd hey, I post there. And I'm really really interesting. I think I once posted accidentally in Sp*m, when it accidentally became interesting for a moment.

I changed my mind, I think they should both be deleted - then you could start again at the same time and have a race.

I think it's very amusing that a thread about there being too many threads reaches multiple pages.

Me too

Well, it's better than the topic resurfacing every month in a new thread.

xelabale wrote:I changed my mind, I think they should both be deleted - then you could start again at the same time and have a race.

Spamalot isn't designed to be the longest thread in the forum, that isnt its purpose. Read the first post in each thread, and you'll very quickly gather that they have very different goals.

Insomnia!! wrote:

xelabale wrote:I changed my mind, I think they should both be deleted - then you could start again at the same time and have a race.

Spamalot isn't designed to be the longest thread in the forum, that isnt its purpose. Read the first post in each thread, and you'll very quickly gather that they have very different goals.

Yes but that's no fun. I wanna see a bitch fight fair and square.

xelabale wrote:

Insomnia!! wrote:

xelabale wrote:I changed my mind, I think they should both be deleted - then you could start again at the same time and have a race.

Spamalot isn't designed to be the longest thread in the forum, that isnt its purpose. Read the first post in each thread, and you'll very quickly gather that they have very different goals.

Yes but that's no fun. I wanna see a bitch fight fair and square.

The longest thread got a head start and is still behind, stop whining.

xelabale wrote:I changed my mind, I think they should both be deleted - then you could start again at the same time and have a race.

Someone obviously wasn't here when Akiceman deleted Spamalot.

Okay, fair enough

strike wolf wrote:

xelabale wrote:I changed my mind, I think they should both be deleted - then you could start again at the same time and have a race.

Someone obviously wasn't here when Akiceman deleted Spamalot.

Aah. One of the truly great moments of competent and thoroughly considered decisions by a moderator.

Merging the threads would probably break the forum. Which would then lead to a CC version of World War 3.

Well if every global mod and admin got bored they could merge them and then by hand split them

Night Strike wrote:Merging the threads would probably break the forum. Which would then lead to a CC version of World War 3.

Yes I personally guarrantee that merging them would turn out worse than when AK deleted Spamalot.

MeDeFe wrote:

xelabale wrote:

Insomnia!! wrote:

xelabale wrote:I changed my mind, I think they should both be deleted - then you could start again at the same time and have a race.

Spamalot isn't designed to be the longest thread in the forum, that isnt its purpose. Read the first post in each thread, and you'll very quickly gather that they have very different goals.

Yes but that's no fun. I wanna see a bitch fight fair and square.

The longest thread got a head start and is still behind, stop whining.

Even with the setback from AK Iceman

But yeah-the two threads are just two different threads for people to have random conversations about anything

spamalot and "the longest thread" should be merged

I have a very strong urge to kill you right now...

Iliad wrote:
But yeah-the two threads are just two different threads for people to have random conversations about anything

that is not true!!!!!!

Iliad wrote:

MeDeFe wrote:

xelabale wrote:

Insomnia!! wrote:

xelabale wrote:I changed my mind, I think they should both be deleted - then you could start again at the same time and have a race.

Spamalot isn't designed to be the longest thread in the forum, that isnt its purpose. Read the first post in each thread, and you'll very quickly gather that they have very different goals.

Yes but that's no fun. I wanna see a bitch fight fair and square.

The longest thread got a head start and is still behind, stop whining.

Even with the setback from AK Iceman

But yeah-the two threads are just two different threads for people to have random conversations about anything

and while Spamalot has said repeatedly that it doesn't care if it's the longest or not. The main goal of the Longest thread is just that. Plus they've both evolved into unique entities with their own, though often overlapping, social groups.

targetman377 wrote:

Iliad wrote:
But yeah-the two threads are just two different threads for people to have random conversations about anything

that is not true!!!!!!

Man can you argue well.

Can't debate against all those exclamation marks.

btw. !

Iliad wrote:

targetman377 wrote:

Iliad wrote:
But yeah-the two threads are just two different threads for people to have random conversations about anything

that is not true!!!!!!

Man can you argue well.

Can't debate against all those exclamation marks.

I find this extremely offensive!!!!!! i'm going to report it as soon as possible!!!!!

Skittles! wrote:

Iliad wrote:

targetman377 wrote:

Iliad wrote:
But yeah-the two threads are just two different threads for people to have random conversations about anything

that is not true!!!!!!

Man can you argue well.

Can't debate against all those exclamation marks.

I find this extremely offensive!!!!!! i'm going to report it as soon as possible!!!!!

You're just being bigoted against exclamation marks!!!!!!! And you're a hypocrite!!!!!!!!