Conquer Club

So what, just declare whose the cop so the mafia can get them?

think about it spies.

TheSaxlad wrote:So what, just declare whose the cop so the mafia can get them?

think about it spies.

If you are trying to imply that you are the cop, you are playing quite poorly. The cop is supposed to shut up and walk small till he has something, you will likely be NKed for what you have already implied.

I AM NOT THE COP, im saying why would i incriminate the cop for the reasons above.

theherkman wrote:Explain, since that isn't true. When you FOS or VOTE someone, you need to provide some reasoning behind it. Otherwise it looks bad for you. Like you are simply throwing up smoke. (You are.) But please explain what you mean.

I'm a bit busy at the moment, but I'll respond tonight.

Seriously guys, no need to role claim at the moment - everyone take a step back and focus.

We need a lynch and dazerazer is looking like a better target than anybody so unvote vote dazerazer

TheSaxlad wrote:So what, just declare whose the cop so the mafia can get them?
think about it spies.

I don't understand:
A. What you are saying here.
and B. How you derived this from my statement.

ok no role claiming then.



Is daze hung yet?

Ok I hate to point the finger at someone while they are out of town but something I found that looks interesting about Sensfan:

sensfan wrote:confirm

sensfan wrote:vote sensfan for voting myself

sensfan wrote:dazer is just being annyoning

vote dazer

sensfan wrote:VOTE COUNT please

sensfan wrote:absent until sunday.

Those are all of his posts in this game, he's posted just shy of an average of one post a day and has contributed pretty much zero to the conversation. This looks to me like he is trying to fly under the radar and avoid all atention and for those reasons I think he should be at least a person of interest in this game. Strong FOS: Sensfan

TheSaxlad wrote:ok no role claiming then.



Is daze hung yet?

Technically a player should role claim (with certain exceptions) about the time they get to L-2 but no sooner. Role claiming is a last line of defense for someone when they are about to get lynched. Other than that I would have to say you seem fairly anxious to get to a Daze lynch. ANy reason why?

strike wolf wrote:Ok I hate to point the finger at someone while they are out of town but something I found that looks interesting about Sensfan:

sensfan wrote:confirm

sensfan wrote:vote sensfan for voting myself

sensfan wrote:dazer is just being annyoning

vote dazer

sensfan wrote:VOTE COUNT please

sensfan wrote:absent until sunday.

Those are all of his posts in this game, he's posted just shy of an average of one post a day and has contributed pretty much zero to the conversation. This looks to me like he is trying to fly under the radar and avoid all atention and for those reasons I think he should be at least a person of interest in this game. Strong FOS: Sensfan

Sadly he don't get more profound than that.

As for Dazer I say that we should stop voting her. Not because I don't think we should lynch her butt but rather because the votes are getting too high and we need to make sure we don't lynch her without a role claim as THAT'S how we lose our cops.

re-reading, if I don't post something serious within the next 2 hours replace me lol.

Fircoal wrote: As for Dazer I say that we should stop voting her. Not because I don't think we should lynch her butt but rather because the votes are getting too high and we need to make sure we don't lynch her without a role claim as THAT'S how we lose our cops.

i think she is not at L-2 yet, some guys unvoted her already, anyway a vote count could be mighty useful at this point
now in other hand, chu, seeing you so serious is freaking me out :B even your spelling improved, do you want the premium that badly?

Vote Count

mandelorian (2) - fircoal, karel
Freezie (1) - spiesr,
naxus (1) - ace
fircoal (1) - mandy
victor (1) - pmc
AoG (2) -violet, dazerazer,
dazerazer (12) - victor, edocsil, ga7, saxlad, haggis, sensfan, flores, jace, strikewolf, blake, daze, nag
saxlad (1) - commander
the herk (1) - AoG
violet (1) - /
commander (1) - the herk

16 to lynch.

FloresDelMal wrote:

Fircoal wrote: As for Dazer I say that we should stop voting her. Not because I don't think we should lynch her butt but rather because the votes are getting too high and we need to make sure we don't lynch her without a role claim as THAT'S how we lose our cops.

i think she is not at L-2 yet, some guys unvoted her already, anyway a vote count could be mighty useful at this point
now in other hand, chu, seeing you so serious is freaking me out :B even your spelling improved, do you want the premium that badly?

WHY DO YOU ALL THINK THAT I NEED A TANGIBLE GOOD IN ORDER TO TRY TO PLAY WELL!?!?!?!

So L-4 it is...

OMFG... I did not realize you got premium for this! f*ck yeah!!!

theherkman wrote:OMFG... I did not realize you got premium for this! f*ck yeah!!!

strike wolf wrote:Ok I hate to point the finger at someone while they are out of town but something I found that looks interesting about Sensfan:

sensfan wrote:confirm

sensfan wrote:vote sensfan for voting myself

sensfan wrote:dazer is just being annyoning

vote dazer

sensfan wrote:VOTE COUNT please

sensfan wrote:absent until sunday.

Those are all of his posts in this game, he's posted just shy of an average of one post a day and has contributed pretty much zero to the conversation. This looks to me like he is trying to fly under the radar and avoid all atention and for those reasons I think he should be at least a person of interest in this game. Strong FOS: Sensfan

I hereby present you Sensfan, when he wants to make sense he can, however that's as deep as he generally go before then. He's like Colton, but less than colton, with more than colton.

Fircoal wrote:WHY DO YOU ALL THINK THAT I NEED A TANGIBLE GOOD IN ORDER TO TRY TO PLAY WELL!?!?!?!

because at least speaking for myself, i never saw you write whole sentences before dont be mad chu chu, i still love you heh

Fircoal wrote: WHY DO YOU ALL THINK THAT I NEED A TANGIBLE GOOD IN ORDER TO TRY TO PLAY WELL!?!?!?!

Because you never did before?
Frankly even if Daze's version makes sense as to how she got to communicate with Vio, I still think it's the best day 1 lynch to sort things out. It won't necessarily bring light to their alignment but will provide good info on the wagon, especially if she's scum as we'll have great targets. I'd rather go that way than put pressure on someone else at this point.

@ Herkman, the more I see from you, the more "interesting" you are becoming. I have provided reasons for every single of my accusations, especially against Sax and you. It's also quite funny that as soon as pay some attention to you and question a bit you go extremely defencive and attack me.

You posted quite a few times (3, if I'm not mistaken) to first get in here (obviously, that's because of the premium) and now that you did get in, your behaviour is interesting. First, you post this

theherkman wrote:I'm so excited!!!

So... Since we really don't know anything yet... Why are we voting people? We're gonna lynch our cop or doctor or some shit... That would be bad... Anyone explain that to me?

Which sounds good and decent enough. Then you continue on that till you find out about the lynching (it seems that you may want no lynching because it's good for the mafia? Perhaps, perhaps not.)

theherkman wrote:Oh, okay. That explains it better, but still... I don't want to be the byproduct of a mislynch. Lol! Who does?

Hmm, interesting. You just had one vote (albeit random), but this is your 2nd defencive post (albeit quite mild). However, then you

theherkman wrote:VOTE AOG

For voting me.

Isn't it hypocritical that first you vote a person for just voting against you and when someone just thinks that you're acting a bit suspiciously, you start to vote against him straight away. Hmmm.... Furthermore, nietzsche, who found you a bit odd, was stalked by you according to him:

nietzsche wrote:vote for theherkman

reason: this creep went through my game chats, i don't evevn know why, and he he's telling everyone what i say in game chats he should be voted out as soon as possible or he might do the same to you! vote for him!!

The next post is even more interesting:

theherkman wrote:
Can you explain that to me? Voting someone because they vote for me is a scum tell, but voting someone because they post in an obnoxious color is okay? Are you serious?

HYPOCRITE much? You first vote against AoG because he voted against you and now you say that this is a scum tell (keep in mind that the situation will be repeated with me). You say that I have no reasons to vote against you, yet you vote someone because of the colour or that they voted against you. Then, after some pressure from the crowd, you

theherkman wrote:Okay... I suppose that makes sense that I don't want him to die if he's a good guy...

UNVOTE AOG VOTE DAZE

Do you provide any reasons? No. Next post - you try to direct attention from that and look for someone else to blame.

theherkman wrote:
Who was the first person to vote because of the color?

Then, even your posting wasn't much better, you go against Daze, even though you had not stated why you voted against her the first time...

theherkman wrote: That doesn't actually sound that convincing to me...

theherkman wrote:And I'm not sure what to do, but I'm going to go with the fact that most of you know what you are doing. Also, most of you are good. And most of you are saying vote Dazerazer... So again... vote dazerazer

Bandwagon and attention diverting much? After that, you attack another person for doing exactly what you did at the start:

theherkman wrote:

nietzsche wrote:Sorry guys, I didn't know I couldn't post here.

I posted it on your wall... Why are you still posting? Sign up for a replacement if you really want in.

More hypocrite much?

theherkman wrote:No prob, Squirrel.

So does this mean that everyone else will jump on the bandwagon and vote Daze now? Is she pretty much dead? We should hurry cause I want to know what she is. Lol!

Again, interesting to say the least.

theherkman wrote:
Are you shitting me? Do you seriously consider that flaming? Damn, man... You need to get out more... If she turns out scummy, deff FOS Commander9

After attacking Daze for no reason (or at least no reason stated) (and trying to lynch her), you FoS me because I point that out.

theherkman wrote:You know, on second thought, upon rereading this, I think that you, violet and daze are all scum. You are defending daze and saying that I am flaming because I don't buy her excuse? This may have been the biggest scum tell of this entire game.

Now, even though you're saying that you're new, you already assume that I was "Defending" her and that is the biggest scum tell. I mean, obviously you contributed much up to this point and you definitely were involved... Right. Interesting...

After that you post:

theherkman wrote:I could be wrong here as I am quite new at this, it just seems like you went on major defensive for a simple sentence posted (Accusations of flaming).

Really interesting, when I point out that I wasn't defending anyone and just stating a fact, while you just attack yet another person without having any good reasons. Then, when you ask why I voted against Sax, I answer with :

Commander9 wrote:Again, this is my 2nd game, so I still don't know the stuff well enough. If possible to replace the inactives, I'm all for it. As for Sax, first of all, he goes on to vote people for a lot of random stuff, yet now, when the action has started and there have been quite a few interesting things going on, he has disappeared and not posted anything for a while (6 pages ago was his last post).

I just don't like a person to flip votes all over the place around at the start, yet when some discussions started, he's gone.

It's interesting that after my answer, you don't respond anything, but after I say that your behaviour during this game is suspicious, your response:

theherkman wrote:FOS Commander for this scummy accusation. You randomly vote giving little or no explanation. You are completely against lynching Daze despite her suspicious behavior. You would throw your vote around at anyone who looks at you the wrong way. It looks like you might be scum yourself. With that said... UNVOTE DAZE VOTE COMMANDER9

You completely ignore all of my previous posts with explanations and since I point out that your gameplay is rather interesting, you vote against straight away and get all defencive (just like the 1st time). After that, someone else notices and posts:

spiesr wrote:

theherkman wrote:But what if he is mafia and he is putting this idea out there so when he is investigated and comes up scum he can point back here as a defense?

Because, miller is a terrible fake claim. The town would likely lynch you if you claimed that.

theherkman wrote:How is it that anyone is gonna roleclaim then?

When the town forces them to in order to prove why they should not be lynched.

TheSaxlad wrote:You don't have to back me openly, just don't vote for me.

This line sounds fairly scummy to me...

AND YOU COMPLETELY IGNORE THAT STATEMENT AGAIN. Furthermore, you post:

theherkman wrote:OMFG... I did not realize you got premium for this! f*ck yeah!!!

Yet, you posted 3 times wanting to get into the game as soon as you can and you've never been in a Mafia game before. Interesting...



I do realize that now I will be deal with, but for me, this is much more of a scum claim than Saxlad has...

@ Sax - I can understand you being away for the day, but I'm still keeping my vote on you.

Okay, I'm digging my grave, but for the reasons stated above:

Unvote. Vote The Herkman.

ga7 wrote:Frankly even if Daze's version makes sense as to how she got to communicate with Vio, I still think it's the best day 1 lynch to sort things out. It won't necessarily bring light to their alignment but will provide good info on the wagon, especially if she's scum as we'll have great targets. I'd rather go that way than put pressure on someone else at this point.

Good enough for day 1...
Unvote Vote dazerazer

Ok I have reread- sorry for inactivity for reasons why see fircoals post about me being an emo

Firstly I believe that both commaner and herk are tw otownies argunig it out tunnelvision style, I really don't see much happening there.

Now the big wagon on daze. Sound like nonesense to me, there is a slight suspicion in the way she has posted but certainly not enough to warrant 12 votes. Can anyone post a single good reason why they are voting for her? Here are what I see as the reasons given and why I think they are nonsense:

edocsil wrote:Vote dazerazer, that color is obscene.

Anyone voting on such a large wagon for this reason solely is extremely scummy.

ga7 wrote:Unvote Vote Daze not for the colour but an actual serious reason: popping up claiming to have been busy within MINUTES of being voted for submarining means you were actually following this and didn't bother posting for an entirely different reason than just being busy: being a busy scum

People keep alluding back to a legitimate reason given in the beggining but this has since been explained so now we are left with the whole bio + daze are scumbuddies accusation. They are clearly friends outside of mafia, I knew this before hand but that doesn't excuse them sticing up for each other in this game. To me it seems like they have alligned themselves together, but this could be for any number of reasons including them being friends or the possibility of masons. Until one of them does something to appear scumym I don't see how this link could be contrieved as a tell. Finally:

nagerous wrote:Seriously guys, no need to role claim at the moment - everyone take a step back and focus.

We need a lynch and dazerazer is looking like a better target than anybody so unvote vote dazerazer

I think this line of reasoning is very scummy, town should want to be sure to find a good target and not just vote for the guy with the most votes. Scum, however, just want anyony lynched that isn't a scum buddy. And for this scummy vote you get my vote, vote nagerous

p.s fos speisr for similar reasons.

Yo, PMC I was one of the first to vote her while we still in the joke vote stage, due to events past I have not unvoted.