Conquer Club

strike wolf wrote:So it's official i have dropped history and so far have not added a class to replace it.

good GOD MAN what where you thinking there is no eqcuse for that !!!! what the hell were you thinking

targetman377 wrote:

strike wolf wrote:So it's official i have dropped history and so far have not added a class to replace it.

good GOD MAN what where you thinking there is no eqcuse for that !!!! what the hell were you thinking

I've explained already. I don't need to explain again.

strike wolf wrote:

targetman377 wrote:

strike wolf wrote:So it's official i have dropped history and so far have not added a class to replace it.

good GOD MAN what where you thinking there is no eqcuse for that !!!! what the hell were you thinking

I've explained already. I don't need to explain again.

Yeah you're the historian - go back and check your sources.

I win.

Winning was invented at McGill University in 1832 due to losing ceasing to be an option.

pimpdave wrote:Winning was invented at McGill University in 1832 due to losing ceasing to be an option.

I heard losing was invented the same year at their arch rival's school.

strike wolf wrote:

pimpdave wrote:Winning was invented at McGill University in 1832 due to losing ceasing to be an option.

I heard losing was invented the same year at their arch rival's school.

Well, you are partially correct. Losing was still invented at McGill University, just by the rival school, while at McGill.

pimpdave wrote:

strike wolf wrote:

pimpdave wrote:Winning was invented at McGill University in 1832 due to losing ceasing to be an option.

I heard losing was invented the same year at their arch rival's school.

Well, you are partially correct. Losing was still invented at McGill University, just by the rival school, while at McGill.

So McGill failed to invent the concept of a tie?

strike wolf wrote:

targetman377 wrote:

strike wolf wrote:

Lucarilover240 wrote:

targetman377 wrote: did some one say quaddropal axle i think so!!! hold on let me dig up my tights i have lining arond!!!!!













i went to far with that didn't i?

Yes, yes you did.


Also, I don't think anyone has said or ever will say "quaddropal axle".

I think target proved you wrong. Thank you come again.

any time i could prove you worng

Than I challenge you to an internet spelling contest.

You probably would have been better off challenging him to a regular spelling contest, since ther are no set rules for anything on the internet, especially spelling. This is only proven further by the existance of the internet-native language, 1337.

pimpdave wrote:

The truly sad part? I completely understand the joke, recognized the character, hell I even LAUGHED. Out loud.

pimpdave wrote:

Refer to my previous post. Only this time, I laughed harder.

Lucarilover240 wrote:

strike wolf wrote:

targetman377 wrote:

strike wolf wrote:

Lucarilover240 wrote:Yes, yes you did.


Also, I don't think anyone has said or ever will say "quaddropal axle".

I think target proved you wrong. Thank you come again.

any time i could prove you worng

Than I challenge you to an internet spelling contest.

You probably would have been better off challenging him to a regular spelling contest, since ther are no set rules for anything on the internet, especially spelling. This is only proven further by the existance of the internet-native language, 1337.

Real life spelling rules apply, googling and other methods of findng proper spelling is prohibitted and I can't really travel to Wisconsin to meet him for a spelling bee nor would I expect him to be able to make it to Georgia for the same reason. And obviously neutral ground is out of the question since i'm wanted in all the other 48 states...

Lucarilover240 wrote:

pimpdave wrote:

The truly sad part? I completely understand the joke, recognized the character, hell I even LAUGHED. Out loud.

Ramirez...step on this to see if it's a land mine.

strike wolf wrote:

Lucarilover240 wrote:

pimpdave wrote:

The truly sad part? I completely understand the joke, recognized the character, hell I even LAUGHED. Out loud.

Ramirez...step on this to see if it's a land mine.

Lucarilover240 wrote:

strike wolf wrote:

Lucarilover240 wrote:

pimpdave wrote:

The truly sad part? I completely understand the joke, recognized the character, hell I even LAUGHED. Out loud.

Ramirez...step on this to see if it's a land mine.

To be honest I don't know anything about this...I'll check it out but don't expect to stick with it.

Okay, I am loving the Sgt Foley thing. So much, in fact, that I'm going to start an entire thread for it.

More simian photographs. **Eats a banana**


--Andy

Lucarilover240 wrote:Okay, I am loving the Sgt Foley thing. So much, in fact, that I'm going to start an entire thread for it.

... Or at least I was going to, if not for the fact that immediately after making this post, my POS laptop crashed on me. Had to use the recovery disc on it. Luckily I know by now not to keep much on it.

RAMIREZ! Take out that harrier with this frisbee!