Page 3 of 3

Re: Waiting lackattack reply-Page 1-post 1

Posted: Tue Oct 12, 2010 4:15 pm
by the.killing.44
1. Obtain rights to map from quert.
2. Receive many complaints about objective being worded badly, not consistent with game mechanism.
3. Change owned image.
4. ???
5. PROFIT

Seriously, why are the usual suspects taking up arms against CC in this battle? They really didn't do anything wrong. quert willingly gave up the rights to the image.

Guys let's all calm down and get back to squezing-uranium and plutonium, for extraordinary strategy in nuclear spoil games

Re: Waiting lackattack reply-Page 1-post 1

Posted: Tue Oct 12, 2010 4:51 pm
by Army of GOD
Uranium isn't revealed until I reserach Atomic Theory...

Re: Waiting lackattack reply-Page 1-post 1

Posted: Tue Oct 12, 2010 11:29 pm
by squishyg
the.killing.44 wrote:1. Obtain rights to map from quert.
2. Receive many complaints about objective being worded badly, not consistent with game mechanism.
3. Change owned image.
4. ???
5. PROFIT

Seriously, why are the usual suspects taking up arms against CC in this battle? They really didn't do anything wrong. quert willingly gave up the rights to the image.

Guys let's all calm down and get back to squezing-uranium and plutonium, for extraordinary strategy in nuclear spoil games


mapmakers don't give up rights to their maps. they allow cc to use them free of charge.

i thought andy's statement was appropriate.

i think its time to stop acting like we just found the missing Watergate tapes.

Re: Waiting lackattack reply-Page 1-post 1

Posted: Wed Oct 13, 2010 1:34 am
by Army of GOD
WERE ALL GONNA DIEEEEEEE

Re: Waiting lackattack reply-Page 1-post 1

Posted: Wed Oct 13, 2010 10:03 am
by AndyDufresne
qwert wrote:"Fruitcake
Maybe I am not seeing it, but I don't actually see an apology. I see some one writing that they regret an action, but this is far removed from an apology. But then again, in the new whacky world of cc perhaps this is what now passes for such."

I dont ask for apology,because i dont expect to get apology(actualy when you check Andy post,you will find only words regret and sorry,but no apology). Probably they regret, that i discover how they work, and who knows how many maps are change in these way. Maybe one day, they will be more open to community, and will much more announce what they have in mind.
Now what its left,that Andy go to Europe 1914 topic,and finaly after 2 years post,and announce that they made change on map, i think that these will be satisfactory for all.


I'm sorry that we did not inform you, qwert. It was an oversight on our part.

I regret that you feel like we have targeted you in any way, since it isn't the case. We respect you and your talents, qwert.


--Andy

Re: Waiting lackattack reply-Page 1-post 1

Posted: Wed Oct 13, 2010 1:13 pm
by Serbia
the.killing.44 wrote:and the fat it's quert just makes it all the better.

fact*

the.killing.44 wrote:Guys let's all calm down and get back to squezing-uranium and plutonium

squeezing*

Re: Waiting lackattack reply-Page 1-post 1

Posted: Thu Oct 14, 2010 1:51 pm
by theherkman
AndyDufresne wrote:
qwert wrote:"Fruitcake
Maybe I am not seeing it, but I don't actually see an apology. I see some one writing that they regret an action, but this is far removed from an apology. But then again, in the new whacky world of cc perhaps this is what now passes for such."

I dont ask for apology,because i dont expect to get apology(actualy when you check Andy post,you will find only words regret and sorry,but no apology). Probably they regret, that i discover how they work, and who knows how many maps are change in these way. Maybe one day, they will be more open to community, and will much more announce what they have in mind.
Now what its left,that Andy go to Europe 1914 topic,and finaly after 2 years post,and announce that they made change on map, i think that these will be satisfactory for all.


I'm sorry that we did not inform you, qwert. It was an oversight on our part.

I regret that you feel like we have targeted you in any way, since it isn't the case. We respect you and your talents, qwert.


--Andy



Again, it appears like he is sorry and regrets that qwert wasn't notified... But how about the rules? At what point does it become okay to say, "To hell with the rules?" Is it after receiving an unspecified number of complaints that can never be corroborated? Or is after many people become confused and speak with those in charge in private? Or is it just when the powers that be feel like they can break the law because they are above it? Perhaps there were too many cigars and glasses of brandy the night in question, causing you to conveniently forget about the rules...

~Herk

Re: Waiting lackattack reply-Page 1-post 1

Posted: Thu Oct 14, 2010 2:00 pm
by the.killing.44
Serbia wrote:
the.killing.44 wrote:and the fat it's quert just makes it all the better.

fact*

the.killing.44 wrote:Guys let's all calm down and get back to squezing-uranium and plutonium

squeezing*

viewtopic.php?f=4&t=95780&p=2804901&hilit=+squeze#p2804901

Re: Waiting lackattack reply-Page 1-post 1

Posted: Thu Oct 14, 2010 9:06 pm
by Serbia
the.killing.44 wrote:
Serbia wrote:
the.killing.44 wrote:and the fat it's quert just makes it all the better.

fact*

the.killing.44 wrote:Guys let's all calm down and get back to squezing-uranium and plutonium

squeezing*

viewtopic.php?f=4&t=95780&p=2804901&hilit=+squeze#p2804901


D'oh!

Re: Waiting lackattack reply-Page 1-post 1

Posted: Thu Oct 14, 2010 9:07 pm
by Army of GOD
Serbia wrote:
the.killing.44 wrote:
Serbia wrote:
the.killing.44 wrote:and the fat it's quert just makes it all the better.

fact*

the.killing.44 wrote:Guys let's all calm down and get back to squezing-uranium and plutonium

squeezing*

viewtopic.php?f=4&t=95780&p=2804901&hilit=+squeze#p2804901


D'oh!


I'm an artard*

Re: Waiting lackattack reply-Page 1-post 1

Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2010 10:03 am
by Qwert
Well im finaly get lackattack reply, and he kick me out of PM list. What other to say.....