Conquer Club

Oh, and for clarification, geegel= trestain. Trestain replaced him. Sen, Fircoal, I seeee yoooouuuu.

Fircoal wrote:

dussle wrote:

Fircoal wrote:

Master Bush wrote:Would you guys please STFU, and take this elsewhere? We're in the middle of a game here.

agreed.

I agree with houssam's points, but I'm still not sure on if Senfive is mafia or not. Also, giving up is something a stressed mafia would do. Trestain is suspicious too.

Fircoal, the town is in a desperate state. We're getting slaughtered! If I had known I might not have joined. You know what that means? It means that we need to quit being either indecisive or decisive about random people and get our heads in the game. I'm not saying vote trestain because someone needs to die, but look @ geegel. He bandwagoned again and again without giving a single reason and everyone ignored me. I read this entire thread this afternoon and I'm pretty positive that he's the one. Just think about it and think fast. I need that vote.

I KNOW THAT! I know Geegel is the one your talking about, but it's Trestain now, so he's the suspicious one.

I know that, what are you trying to say?

dussle wrote:I read this entire thread this afternoon and I'm pretty positive that he's the one. Just think about it and think fast. I need that vote.

Please don't rush this. I'm still picking through the thread (plus trying to make a dent in my game load). Besides, given the numbers, if we lynch one more townie the game is probably over. And I'd like to give trestain a chance to plead his case before we walk him to the gallows, if that ends up being the general consensus.

Fircoal wrote:
I agree with houssam's points, but I'm still not sure on if Senfive is mafia or not. Also, giving up is something a stressed mafia would do. Trestain is suspicious too.

I am not 100% sure about Senfive either. I have no "information" - just circumstantial. I personally was thinking that if he does turn out to be clean, then my next approach would have been to target the lurkers.

The only thing I do know right now, is that Fircoal and rev, I am quite confident about. Mach I think is also high on the list. he has been very consistent throughout the game. Everyone else in my eyes is suspicious.

Fircoal wrote:

Master Bush wrote:Would you guys please STFU, and take this elsewhere? We're in the middle of a game here.

agreed.

I agree with houssam's points, but I'm still not sure on if Senfive is mafia or not. Also, giving up is something a stressed mafia would do. Trestain is suspicious too.

How can you not be sure, even if he isn't mafia he sure isnt stable he is freaking out all over the place and that is only going to hurt the town. Though I believe it has been heavily outlined how scummy he is today.


get out the ropes.

Okay, having taken a pretty fresh look at the entirety of the game, I have theories. O my brothers and only friends, do I have theories.

But first I have a question. A request, more like.

CBlake, I would very much like if you would list, night by night, all the people you have investigated and the resultant information.

This will go a great deal toward proving your allegiance.

Again, I ask that we not lynch until we give cblake some time to respond.

But cblake, if you don't respond, you will be considered guilty. So please give us that info. If you're town, you'll help us out.

Incandenza wrote:Okay, having taken a pretty fresh look at the entirety of the game, I have theories. O my brothers and only friends, do I have theories.

But first I have a question. A request, more like.

CBlake, I would very much like if you would list, night by night, all the people you have investigated and the resultant information.

This will go a great deal toward proving your allegiance.

Again, I ask that we not lynch until we give cblake some time to respond.

But cblake, if you don't respond, you will be considered guilty. So please give us that info. If you're town, you'll help us out.

i did that a long time ago but w/e

(what i was told)
Machiavelli -townie
fircoal- townie
hitman- townie
everywhere- mafia
senfive - townie

you investagated Everywhere on Night 3 right?

the night before i voted for him

CBlake wrote:the night before i voted for him

That was night 3.

Fircoal wrote:

CBlake wrote:the night before i voted for him

That was night 3.

well then i guess it was night three then

CBlake wrote:

Incandenza wrote:Okay, having taken a pretty fresh look at the entirety of the game, I have theories. O my brothers and only friends, do I have theories.

But first I have a question. A request, more like.

CBlake, I would very much like if you would list, night by night, all the people you have investigated and the resultant information.

This will go a great deal toward proving your allegiance.

Again, I ask that we not lynch until we give cblake some time to respond.

But cblake, if you don't respond, you will be considered guilty. So please give us that info. If you're town, you'll help us out.

i did that a long time ago but w/e

(what i was told)
Machiavelli -townie
fircoal- townie
hitman- townie
everywhere- mafia
senfive - townie

He said to do it night by night.

If you did what he asked then you are saying you investigates everywhere night 4

CBlake- You voted everywhere on page nine without any explanation.

Page nine is day two.

Well, then, cblake, that leads me to my next question: why did you investigate those particular people, especially everywhere and hitman? why wouldn't you investigate geegel/trestain, who's looked so damn mafia this whole game that I'm surprised he hasn't been lynched yet? or houssam, to prove or disprove his mason roleclaim?

I understand that theoretically you're the random cop and get randomized results, but it's your investigation pattern that doesn't make any sense.

Incandenza wrote:Well, then, cblake, that leads me to my next question: why did you investigate those particular people, especially everywhere and hitman? why wouldn't you investigate geegel/trestain, who's looked so damn mafia this whole game that I'm surprised he hasn't been lynched yet? or houssam, to prove or disprove his mason roleclaim?

I understand that theoretically you're the random cop and get randomized results, but it's your investigation pattern that doesn't make any sense.

One word. Noob!!!

Senfive wrote:

Incandenza wrote:Well, then, cblake, that leads me to my next question: why did you investigate those particular people, especially everywhere and hitman? why wouldn't you investigate geegel/trestain, who's looked so damn mafia this whole game that I'm surprised he hasn't been lynched yet? or houssam, to prove or disprove his mason roleclaim?

I understand that theoretically you're the random cop and get randomized results, but it's your investigation pattern that doesn't make any sense.

One word. Noob!!!

That may be, but you're not helping by freaking out.

C'mon, sen, this isn't your first barbeque. All your howling seems really mafia-ish.

So if your not mafia, calm the f*ck down and talk to me. why were you so hot after mach and fircoal on day 4? why not tres/geegel?

Incandenza wrote:

Senfive wrote:

Incandenza wrote:Well, then, cblake, that leads me to my next question: why did you investigate those particular people, especially everywhere and hitman? why wouldn't you investigate geegel/trestain, who's looked so damn mafia this whole game that I'm surprised he hasn't been lynched yet? or houssam, to prove or disprove his mason roleclaim?

I understand that theoretically you're the random cop and get randomized results, but it's your investigation pattern that doesn't make any sense.

One word. Noob!!!

That may be, but you're not helping by freaking out.

C'mon, sen, this isn't your first barbeque. All your howling seems really mafia-ish.

So if your not mafia, calm the f*ck down and talk to me. why were you so hot after mach and fircoal on day 4? why not tres/geegel?

I've played w/ Sen, he always looks really scummy at several points in the game. But really, why has nobody voted against geegel before I got here? The most votes he ever had were two, and now he still doesn't have many more. Come on guys! Someone told me not to rush this, but have you seen the deaths? Half of us are dead, and all the deaths are townies.

dussle wrote:

Incandenza wrote:

Senfive wrote:

Incandenza wrote:Well, then, cblake, that leads me to my next question: why did you investigate those particular people, especially everywhere and hitman? why wouldn't you investigate geegel/trestain, who's looked so damn mafia this whole game that I'm surprised he hasn't been lynched yet? or houssam, to prove or disprove his mason roleclaim?

I understand that theoretically you're the random cop and get randomized results, but it's your investigation pattern that doesn't make any sense.

One word. Noob!!!

That may be, but you're not helping by freaking out.

C'mon, sen, this isn't your first barbeque. All your howling seems really mafia-ish.

So if your not mafia, calm the f*ck down and talk to me. why were you so hot after mach and fircoal on day 4? why not tres/geegel?

I've played w/ Sen, he always looks really scummy at several points in the game. But really, why has nobody voted against geegel before I got here? The most votes he ever had were two, and now he still doesn't have many more. Come on guys! Someone told me not to rush this, but have you seen the s? Half of us are , and all the s are townies.

I was going at it with him, and I strongly felt (and feel) that he was (is) mafia

Machiavelli wrote:

CBlake wrote:

Incandenza wrote:Okay, having taken a pretty fresh look at the entirety of the game, I have theories. O my brothers and only friends, do I have theories.

But first I have a question. A request, more like.

CBlake, I would very much like if you would list, night by night, all the people you have investigated and the resultant information.

This will go a great deal toward proving your allegiance.

Again, I ask that we not lynch until we give cblake some time to respond.

But cblake, if you don't respond, you will be considered guilty. So please give us that info. If you're town, you'll help us out.

i did that a long time ago but w/e

(what i was told)
Machiavelli -townie
fircoal- townie
hitman- townie
everywhere- mafia
senfive - townie

He said to do it night by night.

If you did what he asked then you are saying you investigates everywhere night 4

ok this is my first mafia game but i deleted MB's pm's so im trying to go off memory

CBlake wrote:ok this is my first mafia game but i deleted MB's pm's so im trying to go off memory

I understand, but you still didn't answer my question(s). Why investigate everywhere and hitman? why investigate senfive, when you could have taken a hard look at tres/geegel, especially when the first thing tres did when he took over was vote for you?

CB I can't believe you gave away being a cop! I hope that a doctor's protecting you. I don't like this, it's very possible that CB isn't the cop and he's defending his mafia buddies, but I guess no other mafia have stepped up. CB, I'm guessing a doc'll protect you. If we don't get trestain lynched since you guys are slow as molasses, check him out, will you?

Vote Count

• [2] senfive -- (houssam, rev)
• [2] trestain -- (dussle, mach)
• [5] Not Voted -- (everyone else)

5 Total Votes are needed for a Lynch or No Lynch

THE DEADLINE TO LYNCH IS SUNDAY NIGHT AT MIDNIGHT

Master Bush wrote:Vote Count

• [2] senfive -- (houssam, rev)
• [2] trestain -- (dussle, mach)
• [5] Not Voted -- (everyone else)

5 Total Votes are needed for a Lynch or No Lynch

THE DEADLINE TO LYNCH IS SUNDAY NIGHT AT MIDNIGHT

Ok, this makes me a tad bit suspiscious of houssam and RK. They've both seen Sen play. Sen is always after someone, mafia or not. Currently I just think they're trying to kill of one of the most experienced players, although probably not the best.

dussle wrote:

Master Bush wrote:Vote Count

• [2] senfive -- (houssam, rev)
• [2] trestain -- (dussle, mach)
• [5] Not Voted -- (everyone else)

5 Total Votes are needed for a Lynch or No Lynch

THE LINE TO LYNCH IS SUNDAY NIGHT AT MIDNIGHT

Ok, this makes me a tad bit suspiscious of houssam and RK. They've both seen Sen play. Sen is always after someone, mafia or not. Currently I just think they're trying to kill of one of the most experienced players, although probably not the best.

It doesnt matter if who we kill s experienced.

It's probably lynch or lose at this point because with four mafia (which is the most logical number based on the game size) and ten people, next round mafia have the game won.

Machiavelli wrote:

dussle wrote:

Master Bush wrote:Vote Count

• [2] senfive -- (houssam, rev)
• [2] trestain -- (dussle, mach)
• [5] Not Voted -- (everyone else)

5 Total Votes are needed for a Lynch or No Lynch

THE LINE TO LYNCH IS SUNDAY NIGHT AT MIDNIGHT

Ok, this makes me a tad bit suspiscious of houssam and RK. They've both seen Sen play. Sen is always after someone, mafia or not. Currently I just think they're trying to kill of one of the most experienced players, although probably not the best.

It doesnt matter if who we kill s experienced.

It's probably lynch or lose at this point because with four mafia (which is the most logical number based on the game size) and ten people, next round mafia have the game won.

Yeah, but who'd make more sense to kill, mach? You're already voting for him. Mach brings up a good point though, soething that the rest of you have chosen to ignore. We have no chance if we don't get a mafia, and we've got one day to do it, so get voting!