Conquer Club

that little red star...you guys see it??? its reserved for Jr who has worked so hard for his 27 medals. No one else has that star yet!! So he cant wait to get his points back and put it up there. God, the fucking people that take this site way to serious is astounding!


-tig

xxtig12683xx wrote:that little red star...you guys see it??? its reserved for Jr who has worked so hard for his 27 medals. No one else has that star yet!! So he cant wait to get his points back and put it up there. God, the fucking people that take this site way to serious is astounding!


-tig

thanks for the reminder. I forgot about the star.

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:thanks for the reminder. I forgot about the star.

Indeed. And not only your own stars... *coff*

alstergren wrote:

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:thanks for the reminder. I forgot about the star.

Indeed. And not only your own stars... *coff*

are you missing the "1 st place" star ? I thought it was there. I may have deleted it when I unbolded your name for dropping below 3K. Let me know.

1 Scott-Land 5255 3285 1183 (36%) Conqueror Conqueror 4.6 United States

18 dfaarc 3379 301 105 (35%) Brigadier Brigadier 4.7 United States United States

Question to JR, since multiple people are on the list in the Max thread, will they all be on the wall of shame or only max?

Bruceswar wrote:Question to JR, since multiple people are on the list in the Max thread, will they all be on the wall of shame or only max?

I have to reread the thread. Any player busted that has a top 100 score will be added to the Wall of Shame.

I dint know the verdict was out already. It must have been overwhelming abuse. The following players were busted for cheating and will be added to the wall of shame accordingly. I will update tonight.

maxatstuy
elistuy
fantasianasian
Paddy The Cat
KingOfGods
300Spartans
JesusReigns
Prankcall
JCKing
phantomzero
freeroll84

http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... ead#unread

JR, that is not entirely true, max was the one guilty, the others were the accounts which were abused. Also, the people on the list can appeal the decision, so this is not completely over yet.

1 Scott-Land 5289 3300 1192 (36%) Field Marshal Field Marshal 4.6 United States

lancehoch wrote:JR, that is not entirely true, max was the one guilty, the others were the accounts which were abused. Also, the people on the list can appeal the decision, so this is not completely over yet.

I understand what your saying, but each player is responsible for their account. They could have changed their passwords but choose to let him make moves for them which they full well knew was abuse. So many players ( accounts ) involved, that Im sure everyone knew exactly what was going on and was planned ahead. I will reread the thread in full tonight before any adjustments are made.

As I've stated several times I'm not much for forums, and as such I check these very infrequently. After receiving an email from the Admins accusing me of cheating I searched my name in the forums.

First let me say that I have never cheated. I have never had multiple accounts as accused in the email from the admins, and I have never had a secret alliance, also accused in the email. I'm not sure where these accusations have come from? And to hear that I might be placed on some "wall of shame" sounds very unfair.

I've never had troubles like this and I'm not sure what to do next. I've sent in a ticket. Is there anything else I should do?

Please reply or PM if you like.

Thanks,

Phantomzero

phantomzero wrote:As I've stated several times I'm not much for forums, and as such I check these very infrequently. After receiving an email from the Admins accusing me of cheating I searched my name in the forums.

First let me say that I have never cheated. I have never had multiple accounts as accused in the email from the admins, and I have never had a secret alliance, also accused in the email. I'm not sure where these accusations have come from? And to hear that I might be placed on some "wall of shame" sounds very unfair.

I've never had troubles like this and I'm not sure what to do next. I've sent in a ticket. Is there anything else I should do?

Please reply or PM if you like.

Thanks,

Phantomzero

1 quick response and than I ask that you keep this in the proper forum ( thread ). You gave your password to a player that made moves for you. Im sure in return you had his password as well to make moves for him or "them" since Im sure this was a team effort. This is a common tactic used for team freestyle games which allow players to move for the entire team to get their moves in first before the other team. I dint look at the games to see if this is the case. To make a long story short, you guys abused the babysitting account rules just to climb the scoreboard. Im sure before the verdict was reached, it was reviewed in full detail which usually takes a long period time, if not up to 1 month. This verdict was reached in about 2 days so the evidence must have been overwhelming. you did the right thing by sending in an e-ticket to have the case reviewed and if the verdict is overturned, than I guess thats good news for you. Off the top of my head, you are not in the top 100 scores so you will not be added to the Wall of Shame but you will never be added to the top 100 since you abused the rules to climb the scoreboard.....unless your case is overturned.

good luck with your review

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:

lancehoch wrote:JR, that is not entirely true, max was the one guilty, the others were the accounts which were abused. Also, the people on the list can appeal the decision, so this is not completely over yet.

I understand what your saying, but each player is responsible for their account. They could have changed their passwords but choose to let him make moves for them which they full well knew was abuse. So many players ( accounts ) involved, that Im sure everyone knew exactly what was going on and was planned ahead. I will reread the thread in full tonight before any adjustments are made.

JR It is totally unfair to add anybody to the wall of shame whose name appears on the list. Sure Max should be added, but people like prankcall, fantaisanaisan, and others were innocent. From what I can tell it looks like anybody who had max sit for them at all was included on the list. The ruling is rather lame as it punishes way more people than it should, and max basically gets to keep on abusing the sitting of accounts.

Bruceswar wrote:

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:

lancehoch wrote:JR, that is not entirely true, max was the one guilty, the others were the accounts which were abused. Also, the people on the list can appeal the decision, so this is not completely over yet.

I understand what your saying, but each player is responsible for their account. They could have changed their passwords but choose to let him make moves for them which they full well knew was abuse. So many players ( accounts ) involved, that Im sure everyone knew exactly what was going on and was planned ahead. I will reread the thread in full tonight before any adjustments are made.

JR It is totally unfair to add anybody to the wall of shame whose name appears on the list. Sure Max should be added, but people like prankcall, fantaisanaisan, and others were innocent. From what I can tell it looks like anybody who had max sit for them at all was included on the list. The ruling is rather lame as it punishes way more people than it should, and max basically gets to keep on abusing the sitting of accounts.

I have not added or adjusted anything yet. I will review the case later tonight and with my good friends( mods ) perhaps they will explain a little more in detail for me. Max for sure is busted.

Bruceswar wrote:

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:

lancehoch wrote:JR, that is not entirely true, max was the one guilty, the others were the accounts which were abused. Also, the people on the list can appeal the decision, so this is not completely over yet.

I understand what your saying, but each player is responsible for their account. They could have changed their passwords but choose to let him make moves for them which they full well knew was abuse. So many players ( accounts ) involved, that Im sure everyone knew exactly what was going on and was planned ahead. I will reread the thread in full tonight before any adjustments are made.

JR It is totally unfair to add anybody to the wall of shame whose name appears on the list. Sure Max should be added, but people like prankcall, fantaisanaisan, and others were innocent. From what I can tell it looks like anybody who had max sit for them at all was included on the list. The ruling is rather lame as it punishes way more people than it should, and max basically gets to keep on abusing the sitting of accounts.

Prankcall innocent- how can you make that leap? The mods haven't explained what was actually done by these players. The only thing I know for sure is Max abused account sitting rules- gross abuse. Just let the mods sort out the appeal via etickets .

Well from what has been said (which could be a lie) Max sat for prank and not the other way around. But the mods will sort it all out. The way I read it to be, was pretty much anybody max sat for got blocks.

just noticed Great White is at 3313,new high score for him,,good job pal

1 Scott-Land 5301 3301 1193 (36%) Conqueror Conqueror 4.6 United States
1 Scott-Land 5316 3303 1195 (36%) Conqueror Conqueror 4.6

1 Scott-Land 5327 3305 1197 (36%) Conqueror Conqueror 4.6 United States

Scott-Land wrote:1 Scott-Land 5327 3305 1197 (36%) Conqueror Conqueror 4.6 United States

Nice scott, you and snap have a great race going on.

Georgerx7di wrote:

Scott-Land wrote:1 Scott-Land 5327 3305 1197 (36%) Conqueror Conqueror 4.6 United States

Nice scott, you and snap have a great race going on.

Snapo's just jogging while I'm at a full sprint- it's been fun going back and forth tho'.

1 Scott-Land 5359 3308 1199 (36%) Conqueror Conqueror 4.6 United States

9 MOBAJOBG 3884 2286 1966 (86%) General 4.7 Malaysia

Kindly don't mind my rather lowly presence here, I'm just trying to get my own personal points record updated.

I've just lost about 94 pts on this game http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=3168568

lol- Moba... 13 all time is lowly eh?

1 Scott-Land 5380 3318 1205 (36%) Conqueror Conqueror 4.6 United States

Scott-Land wrote:lol- Moba... 13 all time is lowly eh?

1 Scott-Land 5380 3318 1205 (36%) Conqueror Conqueror 4.6 United States

For someone thats quitting... you seem to be gaining a lot of points.