Conquer Club

Sorry about the bad Skoffin impression. Rereading.

Will reread and post when I get back from school.

mili has been around...and we all know what skoffin is like
spurg hasnt been online..he still hasnt answered a pm i sent him a while ago so im asking for a replace..unless something u know that we dont

crap... everyone has a goose as an avatar. Even me, though I didn't change it myself.

Anarkistsdream wrote: These are the people who posted three times or less...

Riggable is at 3, and so is Militant and Skoffin.

However, THESE are the people that don't talk, don't give reasons why they're voting, or plain just don't participate at all.

That is bullshit, i have posted way more than three times, and always give reasons for my votes.

Unvote Vote Militant I forgot if I still had a valid vote on. militant is still looking scummy from the not voting wicked situation and trying to justify it. I'm not convinced.

militant wrote:

Anarkistsdream wrote: These are the people who posted three times or less...

Riggable is at 3, and so is Militant and Skoffin.

However, THESE are the people that don't talk, don't give reasons why they're voting, or plain just don't participate at all.

That is bullshit, i have posted way more than three times, and always give reasons for my votes.

no need to get angry
trying to play to town is like playing scum

militant wrote:

Anarkistsdream wrote: These are the people who posted three times or less...

Riggable is at 3, and so is Militant and Skoffin.

However, THESE are the people that don't talk, don't give reasons why they're voting, or plain just don't participate at all.

That is bullshit, i have posted way more than three times, and always give reasons for my votes.

So prove it, because I was the one who went back and counted. If I missed your posts, forgive me, but copping an attitude without being able to back it up is dangerous.

mandalorian2298 wrote:

kalishnikov wrote:Selin does make a few good points about AD however I've played a number of games with AD as scum and been scum with AD a few times, and this isn't his style. When he's scum he's a classic submariner, always lurking but never posting. Also I think if AD was scum he would have showed some sort of connection with someone one way or another considering his amount of posts in this game and I don't see that. If anything, I'd say he looks third party but I'm far from convinced that our priority should be lynching miscellaneous unaligned fellows (unless he's an SK, which I also doubt, far to active for that) when we've still got a fully-staffed second scum family about.

Am I defending AD? Not so much, I'm just saying that we really should try and hit one of the aforementioned second family-types today and I don't think he's it. And for the record, I do think AD looks slightly scummy, thus my earlier FOS...
Oh and another reason to not kill him right now is he is by far the most knowledgeable player as far as the storyline is concerned and that could help us a great bit. He can be a fall-back lynch to end the day, thats fine, but I'm not sure he's scum at the moment and I really think we should end this day by hitting someone from that other family.

Nark NEVER subamarrines. If he's on-line, he will always write something, no matter his alligance. Also, being a good player, he always come out equaly aggressive.

The reason why I colored your post is to show that you offer 5 separate reasons why Nark shouldn't be lynched. To quote my favorite TV show: "The only reason to provide multiple reasons is that you're fishing for one that will sound plausible." If Nark is a non-Corleone Scum, then I am sure that Kalish is also a member of the non-Corleone Mafia.

SFOS Kalish

Fair enough and I follow your logic (for once ) but the quoted post was more of a 'thinking out load' then a fishing for a plausible reason, as you said. But I do disagree with AD not submarining, he's definitly been known to, especially lately.

Do you think I would have made this long of a post to defend a scum buddy? Hell no, I'd slap a vote on him, say something like "yea, you make a good point" and move on. All I'm tryin to say is I really don't think AD is scum and we should try to lynch one of the second family today as they are full strength and to confirm that they are the Brazinis (sp? lol).

nagerous wrote:crap... everyone has a goose as an avatar. Even me, though I didn't change it myself.

Yea, what the hell is up with that? How would all our avatars change to that by themselves?

got tonkaed wrote:Given the fact that kalish according to mando is an AD defensive lawyer at the moment (not really a role, just me having fun with language so dont get your undies all in a bunch) i find it interesting that he also voted riggable without an explanation under some pretense that he knew something but didnt want to divluge what it was.

So ill vote kalish for now until something else comes along

I could make an allegation about you being a skimmer, but I won't. I receive information, but my information can be tampered with as most can when dealing with the mob, I will NOT follow through with a vote/posting of info when I feel there was a possibility that it was altered.

What better a way to get lynched for trying to help then by outting scum only to find out your info was altered and said scum was actually town, then I get lynched (presumably for being scum) and we are 2 down over scum-altered info. Doesn't it make a bit more sense to hold it until I can verify tomorrow? (as I've already stated) I realized that I felt it was altered after I posted so it was to late.

And if I show up dead tonight you already know who the scum is because I've named/voted him. Does this shed any light on why I did what I did, fools?

kalishnikov wrote:

got tonkaed wrote:Given the fact that kalish according to mando is an AD defensive lawyer at the moment (not really a role, just me having fun with language so dont get your undies all in a bunch) i find it interesting that he also voted riggable without an explanation under some pretense that he knew something but didnt want to divluge what it was.

So ill vote kalish for now until something else comes along

I could make an allegation about you being a skimmer, but I won't. I receive information, but my information can be tampered with as most can when dealing with the mob, I will NOT follow through with a vote/posting of info when I feel there was a possibility that it was altered.

What better a way to get lynched for trying to help then by outting scum only to find out your info was altered and said scum was actually town, then I get lynched (presumably for being scum) and we are 2 down over scum-altered info. Doesn't it make a bit more sense to hold it until I can verify tomorrow? (as I've already stated) I realized that I felt it was altered after I posted so it was to late.

And if I show up dead tonight you already know who the scum is because I've named/voted him. Does this shed any light on why I did what I did, fools?

So now the scum kills you tonight and it looks like it was my fault?

Jeez, thanks.

Anarkistsdream wrote:

kalishnikov wrote:

got tonkaed wrote:Given the fact that kalish according to mando is an AD defensive lawyer at the moment (not really a role, just me having fun with language so dont get your undies all in a bunch) i find it interesting that he also voted riggable without an explanation under some pretense that he knew something but didnt want to divluge what it was.

So ill vote kalish for now until something else comes along

I could make an allegation about you being a skimmer, but I won't. I receive information, but my information can be tampered with as most can when dealing with the mob, I will NOT follow through with a vote/posting of info when I feel there was a possibility that it was altered.

What better a way to get lynched for trying to help then by outting scum only to find out your info was altered and said scum was actually town, then I get lynched (presumably for being scum) and we are 2 down over scum-altered info. Doesn't it make a bit more sense to hold it until I can verify tomorrow? (as I've already stated) I realized that I felt it was altered after I posted so it was to late.

And if I show up dead tonight you already know who the scum is because I've named/voted him. Does this shed any light on why I did what I did, fools?

So now the scum kills you tonight and it looks like it was my fault?

Jeez, thanks.

Why would it look like it's your fault? When have I voted you or even said I thought you were scum? You do realize I'm being voted for 'defending' you, right?

Can you fools follow anything?

You haven't voted anyone as far as I can see.

*shakes head, leaves thread*

I'm done with you guys for the day, off to have more productive conversations with the stapler on my desk...

kalishnikov wrote:*shakes head, leaves thread*

I'm done with you guys for the day, off to have more productive conversations with the stapler on my desk...

Kalish... You unvoted Riggable and voted wicked.

Since then, you haven't put your vote back on him.

Severe mood swings so the post coming a bit late.

I doubt I have 3 or less posts in the thread, because iirc, I was quite active on Day 1, but too lazy to check anyway. The one point that is in AD's favour is his knowledge of the theme, so it would definitely be beneficial for the scum to out him if he is not scum himself and I doubt as a scum he would be so forthcoming about it seeing how it helps town more.

And I agree much attention should be given to the scummariners, aka Skoffin

unvote vote Skoffin

Don't know why she should be just allowed to submarine and get away with it?

What the hell, why do I have an avatar? And that too of goose?

Anarkistsdream wrote:

militant wrote:

Anarkistsdream wrote: These are the people who posted three times or less...
Riggable is at 3, and so is Militant and Skoffin.

However, THESE are the people that don't talk, don't give reasons why they're voting, or plain just don't participate at all.

That is bullshit, i have posted way more than three times, and always give reasons for my votes.

So prove it, because I was the one who went back and counted. If I missed your posts, forgive me, but copping an attitude without being able to back it up is dangerous.

ok:
12345678910111213

Now that I can go back and look at your posts, I can see how terribly scummy several of them look.

Every one of those posts is in defense of wicked.

Not only that, but two or three of those posts were just to make off-handed comments that had nothing to do with the game, such as your first random vote and then your reasoning for it.

Guys, if you all go back and look at these posts, I strongly feel that you will agree with me.

Unvote

Vote: Militant.

I know i am inexperianced, but do you think if i was scum, i would blatantly defend wicked like that. I am not stupid, what i said was my opinion on the matter when i posted, i had no idea wicked was scum, and thought it was a bad idea to "speed lynch" anyone, regardless of if we had a report.

Ok those posts are pretty damning...

Unvote Vote Militant

militant wrote:I know i am inexperianced, but do you think if i was scum, i would blatantly defend wicked like that. I am not stupid, what i said was my opinion on the matter when i posted, i had no idea wicked was scum, and thought it was a bad idea to "speed lynch" anyone, regardless of if we had a report.

You're not inexperienced, when active you can be a pretty good player.

Vote Militant

Sierra_Leon 2.0 is replacing Kernal_Kronic.

ooh ooh!! I can replace!!