Conquer Club

Anarkistsdream wrote:

The Weird One wrote:well, I'm satisfied that clive's being honest [what with exile's role being what it was]

One thing I would like to know, though is What in the Hell is a biased historian?

I threw this question out a page or two ago and people just breezed right through it.

Well, I dont know for sure, because it could mean quite a few things, but it could mean biased to a certain faction.

militant wrote:

Anarkistsdream wrote:

The Weird One wrote:well, I'm satisfied that clive's being honest [what with exile's role being what it was]

One thing I would like to know, though is What in the Hell is a biased historian?

I threw this question out a page or two ago and people just breezed right through it.

Well, I dont know for sure, because it could mean quite a few things, but it could mean biased to a certain faction.

This is what I think it means. It's possibly like town is biased for town to win, or mafia is biased for mafia to win. But a historian, so maybe biased in kills or something? Makes no sense for me.

Clive wrote:

Sierra_Leon wrote:Clive replaced Dito.

Clive, dito already claimed day 1. Please reread and answer my previous post.

I'm not reading through all these pages. Repost what you want from me. I'm no power so I don't know what you can expect me to answer.

Skoffin, can we get a replacement for Clive please? One that actually bothers reading a game he replaces into?

By the way, what do people make of this?

Skoffin wrote:~bzzzt~
Once again the PA system kicked into life, and a serene, feminine voice drifted down from the speakers.
"I AM ATHENA, GODDESS OF WISDOM AND PEACE. MY BROTHER ARES IS ALSO IN THIS GAME. ARES IS SCUM, MAFIA OR CULT I DON'T KNOW. HE MUST BE STOPPED ASAP."
The speakers fell back to silence afterwards.

Sierra_Leon wrote:

Clive wrote:

Sierra_Leon wrote:Clive replaced Dito.

Clive, dito already claimed day 1. Please reread and answer my previous post.

I'm not reading through all these pages. Repost what you want from me. I'm no power so I don't know what you can expect me to answer.

Skoffin, can we get a replacement for Clive please? One that actually bothers reading a game he replaces into?

By the way, what do people make of this?

Skoffin wrote:~bzzzt~
Once again the PA system kicked into life, and a serene, feminine voice drifted down from the speakers.
"I AM ATHENA, GODDESS OF WISDOM AND PEACE. MY BROTHER ARES IS ALSO IN THIS GAME. ARES IS SCUM, MAFIA OR CULT I DON'T KNOW. HE MUST BE STOPPED ASAP."
The speakers fell back to silence afterwards.

Pretty straight forward. Ares is scum and since Athena outed him, I assume she's town.

Possibly that Ares is godfather or something.. It actually reminds me of the game "God of War", which involves Ares and Athena, who are against each other... And as Skoffin likes ancient history around that era, it makes sense that she would add them.

I just thought about the biased historian thing.. Most historians, if not all, are biased in their culture. Such one as Herodotus, or Plato, or any other historian from a Greek, Roman, Near East, modern heritage. I don't think it stands for much.

Skittles! wrote:

militant wrote:

Anarkistsdream wrote:

The Weird One wrote:well, I'm satisfied that clive's being honest [what with exile's role being what it was]

One thing I would like to know, though is What in the Hell is a biased historian?

I threw this question out a page or two ago and people just breezed right through it.

Well, I dont know for sure, because it could mean quite a few things, but it could mean biased to a certain faction.

This is what I think it means. It's possibly like town is biased for town to win, or mafia is biased for mafia to win. But a historian, so maybe biased in kills or something? Makes no sense for me.

Perhaps they might be biased to one faction and trys to make the lynch favourable to a certain faction. Like a naive mafia member(he doesn't know the mafia, and the mafia don't know him).

Skittles! wrote:Possibly that Ares is godfather or something.. It actually reminds me of the game "God of War", which involves Ares and Athena, who are against each other... And as Skoffin likes ancient history around that era, it makes sense that she would add them.

This first sentence made me instantly think that maybe Ares is the godfather, and perhaps Athena is a urserper, and that is why she just told everyone he is scum, and said she did not know his faction, to make it look like she was just a clued up townie rather than a mafia ursurper.

But it is just an idea obviously

Maybe the player Athena is a cop, or something along those lines, and picked Ares, but the player only got the role name, and knows he is anti-town.

What did my predesecor claim?

Clive wrote:What did my predesecor claim?

Read or don't replace someone, Clive... C'mon, dude... You know better than that.

Clive wrote:What did my predesecor claim?

... Wouldn't you know what he claimed if it was your role? This is highly scummy, and I think clive needs to get lynched just for this comment.

ace1217 wrote:

Clive wrote:What did my predesecor claim?

... Wouldn't you know what he claimed if it was your role? This is highly scummy, and I think clive needs to get lynched just for this comment.

That didn't even occur to me.
Why ask what was claimed if you are a townie who just does vote counts, as you claimed before???


Well said, Ace...

Unvote
Vote: Clive

good find, either he is lying or genuinly stupid

vote clive

Unvote Vote Clive that does seem extremely scummy.

He could just be checking if Dito fakeclaimed something. Remember Clive claimed to be a vote counter before he asked what Dito claimed. Since both those claims are the same then why are you suscpiscious. Clive couldn't have followed Dito's lead if he didn't read it.

animorpherv1 wrote:

william18 wrote:

animorpherv1 wrote:Nice idea mandy, but I think it's someone who is slanted to either mafia or town, and gets certain results.

Results of what? He was just a survivor. To me it sounds like you know a little more then the rest of us ani. Or maybe im just paraniod.

That's just you, william. SKOFFIN I WANTZ MY ACTION BACK

This caught my attention. Due to Sierra's theory, we can assume that night 1 was 2 scum kills. But night 2 was only one(T1000). The second kill was most likely from a vig to try and get things straight, and I doubt scum would kill a survivor, they would instead just leave him so that the debate will continue the next day and grant them an advantage. Since 1 scum kill, and 1 vig kill happened, where's the other scum kill? And this day animorph says he want's his action back. He put it in caps to signify it was important. Coincidence?

william18 wrote:

animorpherv1 wrote:

william18 wrote:

animorpherv1 wrote:Nice idea mandy, but I think it's someone who is slanted to either mafia or town, and gets certain results.

Results of what? He was just a survivor. To me it sounds like you know a little more then the rest of us ani. Or maybe im just paraniod.

That's just you, william. SKOFFIN I WANTZ MY ACTION BACK

This caught my attention. Due to Sierra's theory, we can assume that night 1 was 2 scum kills. But night 2 was only one(T1000). The second kill was most likely from a vig to try and get things straight, and I doubt scum would kill a survivor, they would instead just leave him so that the debate will continue the next day and grant them an advantage. Since 1 scum kill, and 1 vig kill happened, where's the other scum kill? And this day animorph says he want's his action back. He put it in caps to signify it was important. Coincidence?

Sierra's Theory?

F1fth wrote:Guys, this infiltrator sounds suspiciously like a disguiser role. And I know Skof has been playing on EpicMafia so I know she'd have seen it used enough.

So basically, I think the original T1000 is still alive, and every time he kills someone it reveals that person to have been his role and died, when in actuality, he is still alive.

However, that would mean that Kalish wasn't actually scum though, and that his connection with Dito is irrelevant.

This one.... opps. It's your theory. My mistake.

william18 wrote:He could just be checking if Dito fakeclaimed something. Remember Clive claimed to be a vote counter before he asked what Dito claimed. Since both those claims are the same then why are you suscpiscious. Clive couldn't have followed Dito's lead if he didn't read it.

Vote Clive, first off. Why would he need to fakeclaim if he wasn't a threat to the town?

And you doubt the power of WIFOM, my friend. Exile dying=possible evidence vs. Dito.

pancakemix wrote:

william18 wrote:He could just be checking if Dito fakeclaimed something. Remember Clive claimed to be a vote counter before he asked what Dito claimed. Since both those claims are the same then why are you suscpiscious. Clive couldn't have followed Dito's lead if he didn't read it.

Vote Clive, first off. Why would he need to fakeclaim if he wasn't a threat to the town?

And you doubt the power of WIFOM, my friend. Exile dying=possible evidence vs. Dito.

I highly doubt that Dito fakeclaimed in the first place. Replacements can't be to sure of what the last person said with that role. Sometimes people exagerate their roles so that it's more acceptable.

I don't think there is much weight to Clive's scuminess, but I haven't been here for the whole game.

Loooks like i'll need to go a-re-reading.

william18 wrote:

animorpherv1 wrote:

william18 wrote:

animorpherv1 wrote:Nice idea mandy, but I think it's someone who is slanted to either mafia or town, and gets certain results.

Results of what? He was just a survivor. To me it sounds like you know a little more then the rest of us ani. Or maybe im just paraniod.

That's just you, william. SKOFFIN I WANTZ MY ACTION BACK

This caught my attention. Due to F1fth's theory, we can assume that night 1 was 2 scum kills. But night 2 was only one(T1000). The second kill was most likely from a vig to try and get things straight, and I doubt scum would kill a survivor, they would instead just leave him so that the debate will continue the next day and grant them an advantage. Since 1 scum kill, and 1 vig kill happened, where's the other scum kill? And this day animorph says he want's his action back. He put it in caps to signify it was important. Coincidence?

In light of this:

Vote animorph

for the above reason, I'll vote ani

william18 wrote:

animorpherv1 wrote:

william18 wrote:

animorpherv1 wrote:Nice idea mandy, but I think it's someone who is slanted to either mafia or town, and gets certain results.

Results of what? He was just a survivor. To me it sounds like you know a little more then the rest of us ani. Or maybe im just paraniod.

That's just you, william. SKOFFIN I WANTZ MY ACTION BACK

This caught my attention. Due to Sierra's theory, we can assume that night 1 was 2 scum kills. But night 2 was only one(T1000). The second kill was most likely from a vig to try and get things straight, and I doubt scum would kill a survivor, they would instead just leave him so that the debate will continue the next day and grant them an advantage. Since 1 scum kill, and 1 vig kill happened, where's the other scum kill? And this day animorph says he want's his action back. He put it in caps to signify it was important. Coincidence?

It's very much so important, because I might find a mafia member if I do so.

Anarkistsdream wrote:

ace1217 wrote:

Clive wrote:What did my predesecor claim?

... Wouldn't you know what he claimed if it was your role? This is highly scummy, and I think clive needs to get lynched just for this comment.

That didn't even occur to me.
Why ask what was claimed if you are a townie who just does vote counts, as you claimed before???


Well said, Ace...

Unvote
Vote: Clive

Yup, that's a nice catch Ace.

vote Clive