Conquer Club

We need Flame Wars to avoid situations like this:

http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... 9&start=15

or you could just do this:

http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... 4&t=110555

Rainbow Eater wrote:or you could just do this:

http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... 4&t=110555

Nah. We like fun stuff. There is a forum for the game. Go back there.

Neoteny wrote:

Rainbow Eater wrote:or you could just do this:

http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... 4&t=110555

Nah. We like fun stuff. There is a forum for the game. Go back there.

Yeah! Get the FUDGE out of here before I kick your FUDGIN' rainbow eating toosh!

CreepersWiener wrote:

Neoteny wrote:

Rainbow Eater wrote:or you could just do this:

http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... 4&t=110555

Nah. We like fun stuff. There is a forum for the game. Go back there.

Yeah! Get the FUDGE out of here before I kick your FUDGIN' rainbow eating toosh!

WHOA! Dear God, there could be kids reading this.

CreepersWiener wrote:

Neoteny wrote:

Rainbow Eater wrote:or you could just do this:

http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... 4&t=110555

Nah. We like fun stuff. There is a forum for the game. Go back there.

Yeah! Get the FUDGE out of here before I kick your FUDGIN' rainbow eating toosh!

Mmm, fuuudge.

Rainbow Eater sucks and I hate him/her for hating fun.

I feel like "need" is the wrong word.


--Andy

AndyDufresne wrote:I feel like "need" is the wrong word.


--Andy

"have a right to"? "are symbiotic with"?

muy_thaiguy wrote:

AndyDufresne wrote:I feel like "need" is the wrong word.


--Andy

"have a right to"? "are symbiotic with"?

symbiotic is a good choice of words.

muy_thaiguy wrote:

AndyDufresne wrote:I feel like "need" is the wrong word.

--Andy

"have a right to"? "are symbiotic with"?

I was thinking more along the lines of "think it's a stupid idea to bring back", myself.

Woodruff wrote:

muy_thaiguy wrote:

AndyDufresne wrote:I feel like "need" is the wrong word.

--Andy

"have a right to"? "are symbiotic with"?

I was thinking more along the lines of "think it's a stupid idea to bring back", myself.

Oh, Woody Wood Wood, if Flame Wars is so stupid, wouldn't you think the majority of pollsters would have voted otherwise?

And how am I able to call you Mr.Woodruff the Waggling Wankinator and not have it considered a flame in Monkey Business. Now, if this was Flame Wars, there would be no problem and we could get over the name calling and realize it was all in good fun and continue on with the discussion. But since it is not Flame Wars, that just means that CC has to spend the extra money to review my good standing in the forums and quite possibly ban me from the forums all together.

Having a Flaming forum would forgo all this headache and hassle, and allow human beings to just be what human beings were meant to be...flaming buttards.

I only get what the first and last choices on the poll mean. >.<

CW is very needy. More mustard please
or maybe some cowbell.

CreepersWiener wrote:

Woodruff wrote:

muy_thaiguy wrote:

AndyDufresne wrote:I feel like "need" is the wrong word.

--Andy

"have a right to"? "are symbiotic with"?

I was thinking more along the lines of "think it's a stupid idea to bring back", myself.

Oh, Woody Wood Wood, if Flame Wars is so stupid, wouldn't you think the majority of pollsters would have voted otherwise?

And how am I able to call you Mr.Woodruff the Waggling Wankinator and not have it considered a flame in Monkey Business. Now, if this was Flame Wars, there would be no problem and we could get over the name calling and realize it was all in good fun and continue on with the discussion. But since it is not Flame Wars, that just means that CC has to spend the extra money to review my good standing in the forums and quite possibly ban me from the forums all together.

Having a Flaming forum would forgo all this headache and hassle, and allow human beings to just be what human beings were meant to be...flaming buttards.

I saw FlameWars. It was the most infantile, embarrassing, weak excuse for a group of insults as could be found outside of a pre-school playground. The enormous lack of intellect found in FlameWars is the reason it was removed...no other. It was a true embarrassment to the site.

Woodruff wrote:

CreepersWiener wrote:

Woodruff wrote:

muy_thaiguy wrote:

AndyDufresne wrote:I feel like "need" is the wrong word.

--Andy

"have a right to"? "are symbiotic with"?

I was thinking more along the lines of "think it's a stupid idea to bring back", myself.

Oh, Woody Wood Wood, if Flame Wars is so stupid, wouldn't you think the majority of pollsters would have voted otherwise?

And how am I able to call you Mr.Woodruff the Waggling Wankinator and not have it considered a flame in Monkey Business. Now, if this was Flame Wars, there would be no problem and we could get over the name calling and realize it was all in good fun and continue on with the discussion. But since it is not Flame Wars, that just means that CC has to spend the extra money to review my good standing in the forums and quite possibly ban me from the forums all together.

Having a Flaming forum would forgo all this headache and hassle, and allow human beings to just be what human beings were meant to be...flaming buttards.

I saw FlameWars. It was the most infantile, embarrassing, weak excuse for a group of insults as could be found outside of a pre-school playground. The enormous lack of intellect found in FlameWars is the reason it was removed...no other. It was a true embarrassment to the site.

Question is, when did you see Flame Wars? The steaming pile of crap it had become just before it was deleted, than I would find it hard to disagree with you. However, there was a time when it was actually worth reading, like when dancingmustard, b.k.barunt, and (dare I even say it?) Norse were still posting in it.

muy_thaiguy wrote:

Woodruff wrote:

CreepersWiener wrote:

Woodruff wrote:

muy_thaiguy wrote: "have a right to"? "are symbiotic with"?

I was thinking more along the lines of "think it's a stupid idea to bring back", myself.

Oh, Woody Wood Wood, if Flame Wars is so stupid, wouldn't you think the majority of pollsters would have voted otherwise?

And how am I able to call you Mr.Woodruff the Waggling Wankinator and not have it considered a flame in Monkey Business. Now, if this was Flame Wars, there would be no problem and we could get over the name calling and realize it was all in good fun and continue on with the discussion. But since it is not Flame Wars, that just means that CC has to spend the extra money to review my good standing in the forums and quite possibly ban me from the forums all together.

Having a Flaming forum would forgo all this headache and hassle, and allow human beings to just be what human beings were meant to be...flaming buttards.

I saw FlameWars. It was the most infantile, embarrassing, weak excuse for a group of insults as could be found outside of a pre-school playground. The enormous lack of intellect found in FlameWars is the reason it was removed...no other. It was a true embarrassment to the site.

Question is, when did you see Flame Wars? The steaming pile of crap it had become just before it was deleted, than I would find it hard to disagree with you. However, there was a time when it was actually worth reading, like when dancingmustard, b.k.barunt, and (dare I even say it?) Norse were still posting in it.

shit, this must be the first time I actually agree with you MTG.


Wood, you were not here in it's hay-day when there was a great deal of wit and banter between different groups and individuals like Chaos and Prowler. we even invited outsiders from different FW sites and battled with them(after raiding said site). good times were had by most(not all, because some got mauled).

Hey, first time for everything I suppose.

Real wood FTW!
Down with Propane!

Speaking of which...what do all of those acronyms represent? I don't even know what FTW stands for, never mind the others. Anyone willing to edumacate me? Thanks.

hell, I'm just trying to fit in. Rofl.

(btw, look it up)

Woodruff wrote:Speaking of which...what do all of those acronyms represent? I don't even know what FTW stands for, never mind the others. Anyone willing to edumacate me? Thanks.

FTW-For The Win
LOL-laughing out loud
rofl-rolling on the floor laughing
MTG-me
NSFW-not safe for work
GFY-go f*** yourself
lmao-laughing my ass off

Here you all go, this should be another avenue for you to vent: Smolder Wars

muy_thaiguy wrote:

Woodruff wrote:Speaking of which...what do all of those acronyms represent? I don't even know what FTW stands for, never mind the others. Anyone willing to edumacate me? Thanks.

FTW-For The Win
LOL-laughing out loud
rofl-rolling on the floor laughing
MTG-me
NSFW-not safe for work
GFY-go f*** yourself
lmao-laughing my ass off

I knew most of those, other than the first one and MTG (which I still do not get). So how about FTL?