Moderator: Community Team
armati wrote:MOD EDIT: (Razorvich)
DirtyDishSoap wrote:I haven't been banned yet so no.
Dukasaur wrote:armati wrote:1st, I dont understand this reposting. Just me I guess.
The Guardian article,
smells like horse poop......sorry guardian.
Duk, neat youve been honust and said "Havnt seen any mention of it."
The reason I asked is because there are US warships off the coast of syria right now with more on the way, France decided to join them as well as Britain. More subs and battleships and carriers on the way.
Russian fighters have been armed with anti ship missles, s300 and 400s are in place as well as 11 Russian warships and submarines.
British troops have been captured in e. ghouta by the syrian army.
Obviously the "chemical weapons" bs is just that....bs.
It is simply the excuse being used to invade.....not that it matters.
As the Russians,Iranians,Hezzbolah and Syria have lined up to repell...... the americans have changed their tune....now they wait for evidence of a chemical weapons attack.
A wonderful change of direction from "we dont need evidence"
Russia has been warning the west this could lead to nuclear confontation, China backs Syria as well.
We have never been closer to the destruction of our entire species INCLUDING the cuban crisis than we are today.
and........"Havnt seen any mention of it."
The west is not informing their people. Russians have been told to prepare for nuclear war.
Things that make ya go hmmmmm.
If ya want to follow, u tube southfront for updates and southfront.org for more in depth coverage.
u tube "Israeli news live" being the anti semite I am and all. lol
Also u tube "brother nathanial" more anti semitism, they are both jews in Israel.
They are NOT zionist scumbags.
Also, "syriangirl" u tube, she is phenominal, she knows just about everything, which country pays which set of "rebels" etc
by the way, there are no rebels, they are ALL mercenaries
She has been reporting on their plans etc for years.
Eva Bartlett a canadian independent reporter is good too. Can be sparadic tho.
Best updates as they happen is southfront.
Might be more coverage but thats the ones I follow.
Well, if I see a mushroom cloud on the horizon sometime in the next couple of weeks, my first thought will be, "Damn, armati was right."
I'm not even being sarcastic. That actually will be my first thought. If the Internet survives the EMP, I'll even come on here and post that.
On the other hand, if a couple weeks go by and no mushroom clouds appear, will you be a man, come here and admit that the paranoid websites you get your news from are exactly that, paranoid websites?
King_Herpes wrote:Alright @Ram and armati, let's keep the butt slapping to a minimum, you guys, okay? We are compliant with the undeniability that you guys agree on plenty of source information and there are those that choose a narrower brush for when painting their canvas of life. All that's fine and dandy but you two seem to be doing a gross amount of inviting cajolery with the ass pats.
Tone it back please, carry on all.
Bernie Sanders wrote:King_Herpes wrote:Alright @Ram and armati, let's keep the butt slapping to a minimum, you guys, okay? We are compliant with the undeniability that you guys agree on plenty of source information and there are those that choose a narrower brush for when painting their canvas of life. All that's fine and dandy but you two seem to be doing a gross amount of inviting cajolery with the ass pats.
Tone it back please, carry on all.
King, if these Russian collaborators want to pat each other on the butt, let them. I'm just glad these 2 young men found each other at CC.
patches70 wrote:DDS, it is well known that the US has attempted and successfully accomplished a lot of coups around the world since 1942. If you want a source, how about the Washington Post?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/mon ... e-regimes/
If anything, the list you are complaining about not being sourced is incomplete. The US has attempted coups around the world at least 72 times since WWII. The coup of Iran in 1953 was just declassified back in 2013 and leaves absolutely no doubt that the US overthrew the legitimate government in Iran in 1953 and replaced it with the Shah. We know how that worked out, it led directly to the installation of the Theocratic regime that now leads Iran.
And some of the coups weren't for national security either. Guatemala 1954 the government was overthrown because President Arbenz enacted some land reforms that threatened the United Fruit company's holdings, a US based corporation. To protect the corporation the CIA overthrew Arbenz. This was declassified in 1999.
We also overthrow countries not for our own national security, but for the interests of other countries. Congo, 1960, the first Prime Minister Lunnumba was forced out by Kasavubu (with CIA support) to preserve Belgium business interests. Lunnumba went underground and launched armed opposition to Kasavubu, turning to the Soviets for support, the US wasn't going to support Lunnumba. The CIA then found and helped the Congolese capture Lunnumba who was then soon murdered.
Then of course, there is South Vietnam and President Ngo Dinh Diem, who we initially installed. It was folly from the beginning, installing a Catholic to lead a country that was 95% Buddhist. The Pentagon Papers confirmed the role the US government had in the coup and subsequent murder of Diem and his family. Kennedy was actually shocked at the level of violence shown through the coup. This is established fact and only a moron would deny it, you have heard of the Pentagon Papers haven't you, DDS?
What's funny is that everyone already knows all about these regime changes long before they are declassified.
I'm not familiar with every coup attempt on the aforementioned list by Arm, especially the supposed "successful" ones. But the Washington Post seems to think that the US has attempted at least 72 coups and coup attempts between 1947-1989.
The US under Obama was most certainly behind the coup in Ukraine which ultimately led to the annexation of the Crimea by Russia and effective civil war in the Ukraine. In about thirty years or so our actions will be declassified and we'll get confirmation on what we pretty much already know.
So I'm not so sure you screaming "It ain't true because you're an asshole and your list isn't sourced!" is gonna work so well in this particular case. It's pretty much common knowledge the amount of shenanigans the US gets into when it comes to regime change. You are probably just being obtuse because you just don't like the guy, but hell, if the Devil tells you a truth, it is what it is despite the messenger.
Users browsing this forum: Symmetry