reverend_kyle wrote:I cant even tell whats a mountain... and it looks horrible.
Marvaddin wrote:Ok, dont kill me yet, Im not the best one in then artistic part, but Im not this bad too... The main goal of this first release is discuss playability...
cowshrptrn wrote:reverend_kyle wrote:I cant even tell whats a mountain... and it looks horrible.Marvaddin wrote:Ok, dont kill me yet, Im not the best one in then artistic part, but Im not this bad too... The main goal of this first release is discuss playability...
its not suposed to look like mountains; its supposed to look like a rough sketch.
DublinDoogey wrote:Hey, looking good for a first draft, just as a note, if you want, when it gets to the final version, i can do the graphics if you'd like, just get it there, then tell me how you'd want them.
AndyDufresne wrote:The layout right now currently has the old 'Ladder Problem'...where you can easily climb up from bottom, increasing your territories without reall increasing borders...I'd consider looking for perhaps a different southern layout of countries, or perhaps something similar to the port system...
gavin_sidhu wrote:I like how the "Australia" of this map is in the centre and the big continents around it. Maybe get add borders from paraguai to yellow and argentina.
Any ideas for continent bonuses yet?
joeyjordison wrote:also i like how none of the continents have more than 3 borders (i think :S) so it will make an interesting map to play on.
Pedronicus wrote:Make this map useful to people marv so we can further our knowledge of South American geography- Where The f*ck is Bolivia?
Theres a big river in S America. Add that.
happysadfun wrote:Arequipa=the obviously more cultural and shorter named Cuzco.
Dark green better be worth a lot because you can't conquer across. And arequipa/cusco can't be gotten unless you go all the way down to Santa Cruz and Magallanes and then go all the way up again.
Backglass wrote:Ya gotta have Easter Island. Chilean.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users