Official 200 Maps Celebration

by **danfrank** on Sat Oct 22, 2011 8:50 pm

Well thats a disappointment i do not know if it took my submission the second time .. But since you guys casted doubt i went back and checked it out and found it ... Although technically you could count that as a sixth change .. Well i hope they got the 2nd submission .. clarification from amod would be nice ... well after reading the rules i guess not.. This is where they twist the game and make it not any fun... This map does have 6 modifications .

by **drunkmonkey** on Sat Oct 22, 2011 10:38 pm

There were 5 changes, not 6. If you count that one as 2 different changes, then there's another one you have to count as 6 different changes. You're just upset because you missed one, and looking for someone to blame. :roll:

by **Silver-** on Sat Oct 22, 2011 10:40 pm

3rd map submitted. I am 15/15 so far.

How many player will get the 5 maps...

by **Rodion** on Sat Oct 22, 2011 11:37 pm

I STILL can't find the 5th one. Perhaps tomorrow, with a fresher head?

by **koontz1973** on Sun Oct 23, 2011 12:45 am

Got all 5 on 3 maps now.

Going to go for the full 25. :shock:

So far classic has been the hardest, Conquer was OK, but Italy was very easy. Hoping for more of a challenge in the next one.

by **White Buffalo** on Sun Oct 23, 2011 3:45 am

I quite agree.. Trying to explain them was quite difficult..

by **CJ Lues** on Sun Oct 23, 2011 4:23 am

White Buffalo wrote:I quite agree.. Trying to explain them was quite difficult..

Yeah i found them all in 3 minutes but took 10 minutes to describe it! :lol:

by **betiko** on Sun Oct 23, 2011 5:02 am

are we allowed now to discuss the classic and italian maps? i m curious to know if the most difficult difference for me so far was a big difficulty for others or if they found it easily...

i have 15/15 normally, just worried about explanations that could be considered as unclear, mostly for conquerman.. by the way, weren t we supposed to have a points update after the italian map was offline?

by **zimmah** on Sun Oct 23, 2011 5:47 am

White Buffalo wrote:I quite agree.. Trying to explain them was quite difficult..

in Conquer 4 it wasn't a challenge to find them, but the hard part was thinking of how to say it in an understandable way.

i saw them almost directly except the 5th one, but i still found them all in a minute or 2, but then i was like, hmm, how am i going to word this? lol.

by **zimmah** on Sun Oct 23, 2011 5:55 am

i can confirm there is really 5 differences, no duplicate.

by **Extreme Ways** on Sun Oct 23, 2011 7:02 am

Just that fifth one was a bit hard.

by **thenobodies80** on Sun Oct 23, 2011 7:18 am

If explain the difference is really hard you can use also a screenshot for each difference. I can suggest gyazo, it allows you to click and grab just a part of the screen, in this case the part where you spot the difference. After few seconds, Gyazo will open a web page in your browser,then you have just to go on the image in that page and copy/paste the link of your small screenshot into the submission field into the contest page/form

Here below a quick example into the spoiler:

show: example

Hope it helps.

About the difficulty, the two final rounds will be a bit more harder :twisted:

Nobodies

by **CJ Lues** on Sun Oct 23, 2011 9:00 am

thenobodies80 wrote:If explain the difference is really hard you can use also a screenshot for each difference. I can suggest gyazo, it allows you to click and grab just a part of the screen, in this case the part where you spot the difference

Hope it helps.

About the difficulty, the two final rounds will be a bit more harder
Nobodies

It will help a lot thanx!!! 8-)

I have 15/15 and plan to go all the way!

by **DiM** on Sun Oct 23, 2011 9:33 am

CJ Lues wrote:I have 15/15 and plan to go all the way!

except for the blind and the people that didn't participate i think everybody has 15/15. the modifications were really really easy to spot.
so again i'll have to suggest pixel size modifications unless the organizes want most of the participants tied for 1st place.

by **thenobodies80** on Sun Oct 23, 2011 9:46 am

No, not everyone has 15/15.
But wait for Samuelc812 for the score. I think he is double checking the results I've given to him.

by **QoH** on Sun Oct 23, 2011 9:50 am

Crap, the 5th difference wasn't a duplicate? Damn...

by **betiko** on Sun Oct 23, 2011 10:06 am

DiM wrote:
CJ Lues wrote:I have 15/15 and plan to go all the way!

except for the blind and the people that didn't participate i think everybody has 15/15. the modifications were really really easy to spot.
so again i'll have to suggest pixel size modifications unless the organizes want most of the participants tied for 1st place.

well, if you want to play a game were the organizer just changes a pixel we will let you have fun on your own. this is a game to spot differences with your natural eye, not with photoshop overlapping images or whatever multiple things the technology offers.
And as you can see everyone here seems satisfied with the level of difficulty, and we do have trouble finding some of the differences. I ll be more than happy if we are plenty to find the 25, it seems like a problem for you!

by **DiM** on Sun Oct 23, 2011 10:15 am

betiko wrote:I ll be more than happy if we are plenty to find the 25, it seems like a problem for you!

it's not a competition if everybody wins

by **Extreme Ways** on Sun Oct 23, 2011 10:36 am

DiM wrote:except for the blind and the people that didn't participate i think everybody has 15/15. the modifications were really really easy to spot.
so again i'll have to suggest pixel size modifications unless the organizes want most of the participants tied for 1st place.

I know my eyes aren't perfect, but at classic I could only find 3 and I got 4 on Italy. This one was fairly easy though. =D>

by **Rodion** on Sun Oct 23, 2011 12:03 pm

Conquer 4 was overwhelmingly harder than the other 2 combined, but I should be 15/15 as of now!

by **koontz1973** on Sun Oct 23, 2011 1:17 pm

Some scores would be nice, but on another note, has anyone noticed Classic map is being beaten by World 2.1. :lol:

Just goes to show, nice graphics do not make the map.

by **DiM** on Sun Oct 23, 2011 1:52 pm

koontz1973 wrote:Some scores would be nice, but on another note, has anyone noticed Classic map is being beaten by World 2.1. Just goes to show, nice graphics do not make the map.

i agree that nice graphics don't make a map but i'm lost as to which one of them has nice graphics because they're both absolutely bland and simple. in fact classic actually looks very blurry to me so i'd put world 2.1 a little in front in the graphics race.

by **koontz1973** on Sun Oct 23, 2011 2:33 pm

DiM wrote:
koontz1973 wrote:Some scores would be nice, but on another note, has anyone noticed Classic map is being beaten by World 2.1. Just goes to show, nice graphics do not make the map.

i agree that nice graphics don't make a map but i'm lost as to which one of them has nice graphics because they're both absolutely bland and simple. in fact classic actually looks very blurry to me so i'd put world 2.1 a little in front in the graphics race.

True about classic, always hated the way it looked but it is a step above 2.1 in a sense of that is looks like land and sea, not just coloured blobs shaped.

by **betiko** on Sun Oct 23, 2011 3:39 pm

Rodion wrote:Conquer 4 was overwhelmingly harder than the other 2 combined, but I should be 15/15 as of now!

this just proves that it s perception... for me it was the easiest of all. italy took me more time to finish than (classic+conquerman)X2.
sometimes you just don t see what is obvious.