![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_e_smile.gif)
Same format as last time: vote, and if you want to, write a few sentences or a few paragraphs on why you voted the way you did, or some musings on the topic in general.
Moderator: Cartographers
pepperonibread wrote:You think this might be a bit biased, with most of the people that'll be voting being foundrygoers? The mods usually don't let threads like this be made in General Discussion, but maybe an exception could be made. It would be more representative, I think.
RjBeals wrote:I think our system of organization is pretty straightforward. Maps are divided into 3 categories (Ideas / Development / Final-F). Thread titles are clear, and I think telling someone [Update Pg-36] pretty much explains where to go. Plus, if someone seriously wants to make a map, I don't think 10 minutes of reviewing the handbook is that much to ask for. Consider that maps take months (or years) in production.
bryguy wrote: (example= DiM, he scared me to death when i first entered the foundry, but after a couple of weeks i found out that he wasnt scary at all)
Kaplowitz wrote:bryguy wrote: (example= DiM, he scared me to death when i first entered the foundry, but after a couple of weeks i found out that he wasnt scary at all)
It was definitely his old avatar.
t-o-m wrote:i think it is because the forum is all about critisism, and people take it personally and think they;re being targeted.
seamusk wrote:t-o-m wrote:i think it is because the forum is all about critisism, and people take it personally and think they;re being targeted.
Gotta disagree here. Everyone expects criticism. The biggest thing I've noticed is that 1) there are a lot of egos flying around here, 2) much of the criticism (lets say 33%) is not constructive criticism, and 3) There is a shit load of negativity towards new idea (some combined with constructive criticism but much of it isn't).
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
gimil wrote:seamusk wrote:I got to disagree with this, alot of people lately have been taking resonable constructive critisim very personally. Its true that alot of new ideas are commented on negativly, but usually if someone comes with with competant graphics they will recieve the constructive feedback they need to move on. but alot of these new hopefuls have been known to make these as negative personal attacks.
seamusk wrote: I think more should be expected from those who have been here a while.
seamusk wrote:I always feel an obligation to help new map makers myself (and I've only been here a short while). It seems the right thing to do whether I like something or not.
RjBeals wrote:seamusk wrote: I think more should be expected from those who have been here a while.
I hope more is not expected from me. I contribute what I want to this site. When Lack puts me on the payroll is when you should expect more from me. That's when CC becomes a job, and not a fun pastime - when people expect things from you.
RjBeals wrote:seamusk wrote:I always feel an obligation to help new map makers myself (and I've only been here a short while). It seems the right thing to do whether I like something or not.
What about if there is no hope for the map. Some maps, however passionate the map maker is, will never ever ever get quenched. Why string the poor guy on for a few weeks - when he's just going to abandon the map anyway. It happens all the time. Look at the Baltic States map. That guy has no chance of quenching the map, his skill level is miles away from where he needs to be. The only map maker who ever took the time to learn software, and persist through the foundry, and quench a map was DIM. All others quit.
yeti_c wrote:I changed my vote so that the bar graph looked more like someone sticking their middle finger up!!
C.
MrBenn wrote:Part of me wants to rank the CC forums in order of approachableness... Something like:
Most Approachable...
Q&A
Tournaments
Callouts
Map Foundry
Suggs & Bugs
General Discussion
Flame Wars
... Least Approachable
There is a lot of flaming that goes on in GD - just look at the people who jump over somebody who posts something in there about the dice! In the grand-scheme of things, I'd put the Foundry in the middle... hence my neutral vote, which is bordering on the 'approachable' side.
RjBeals wrote:The only map maker who ever took the time to learn software, and persist through the foundry, and quench a map was DIM. All others quit.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users