Moderator: Cartographers
koontz1973 wrote:well i already came up with my whole concept! so you can guess in advance what i will vote for for all your future questions!!
But can you persuade the others to go along with you? Not everyone likes bombards or auto deploys, so why should they be included? As for players names, I can see that, mine is already on one map. But how many RL places have thenobodies80 as a place name.
greenoaks wrote:koontz1973 wrote:well i already came up with my whole concept! so you can guess in advance what i will vote for for all your future questions!!
But can you persuade the others to go along with you? Not everyone likes bombards or auto deploys, so why should they be included? As for players names, I can see that, mine is already on one map. But how many RL places have thenobodies80 as a place name.
greenoaks could be worked into a map
anamainiacks wrote:You're not letting people change their votes anymore? Is this because of the Small voters changing to theirs to Medium?
SirSebstar wrote:conquest because that is more balanced
iAmCaffeine wrote:I've voted for classic because it leaves more room for variation in special gameplay when designing the map. I like conquest but they're all a bit similar in the way that they're played and I think this map needs to be completely different from anything currently playable.
koontz1973 wrote:anamainiacks wrote:You're not letting people change their votes anymore? Is this because of the Small voters changing to theirs to Medium?
No. I just forgot to click on that box. I do not want to tempt fate and bugger about with it now. Will make sure it is done next time.
pamoa wrote:fantasy medium it would be more fun conquest
even if a bit unbalanced
Leehar wrote:Can't there be more options beyond Conquest for maps that aren't Classic either?
For example, Trafalgar/Arms Race etc aren't either, they have complexity beyond classic, but aren't conquest based where you have to eliminate a base etc?
Chose conquest anyway since classic is just boring
betiko wrote:oh come on koontz, we were just 7 to find your competition last week, seems unfair to award to only 1 of us when you see how easily other mods give GA for much less harder competitions... (not like awarding GAs cost something to send! )
Leehar wrote:Can't there be more options beyond Conquest for maps that aren't Classic either?
For example, Trafalgar/Arms Race etc aren't either, they have complexity beyond classic, but aren't conquest based where you have to eliminate a base etc?
Chose conquest anyway since classic is just boring
betiko wrote:oh come on koontz, we were just 7 to find your competition last week, seems unfair to award to only 1 of us when you see how easily other mods give GA for much less harder competitions... (not like awarding GAs cost something to send! )
voted conquer map because mapmakers come up withinteresting new concepts.
iAmCaffeine wrote:+1
c c wrote:i chose conquest just due to it having more complexity to it vs classic i also think for some thing this big with all the input we should think outside the box beyond classic ( voted )
Users browsing this forum: No registered users