Moderator: Community Team
Iliad wrote:The upside of calling everyone scum and making 1000 predictions is that statistically you should get a few right.
As a bomb, what exactly would you have had to fear from a mafia busdriver? It doesn't allow them to get around your ability or anything.betiko wrote:sorry but what the hell what? I should've claimed my role with the character name on day 1? as I said, i was pretty afraid of a mafia busdriver. not that i have any proof about such role not existing, but think it's a bit unlikely. Also I was pretty sure that claiming my role no one would believe me, any word I said was just analyzed by people self convinced and who would try to extrapolate whatever. Safari ended up being one of them and who voted for me acusing me of doing something actually edocsil did.. And I think that bane being uncounter claimed is much more meaningfull than bomb being uncounterclaimed as a bomb is not a very usual role; bane being a character quite unlikely not to be in the game.
spiesr wrote:As a bomb, what exactly would you have had to fear from a mafia busdriver? It doesn't allow them to get around your ability or anything.betiko wrote:sorry but what the hell what? I should've claimed my role with the character name on day 1? as I said, i was pretty afraid of a mafia busdriver. not that i have any proof about such role not existing, but think it's a bit unlikely. Also I was pretty sure that claiming my role no one would believe me, any word I said was just analyzed by people self convinced and who would try to extrapolate whatever. Safari ended up being one of them and who voted for me acusing me of doing something actually edocsil did.. And I think that bane being uncounter claimed is much more meaningfull than bomb being uncounterclaimed as a bomb is not a very usual role; bane being a character quite unlikely not to be in the game.
Anyhow I understand your desire not to claim before (assuming you are telling the truth now). I don't agree that it was the right choice, but it is a sucky situation to be in. If you claim that role some of it's potential usefulness is lost as the scum won't randomly kill you. The flipside to that is that if you are exposed a town busdriver can then use you as a potential weapon. (Of course there was know way to know if we had a busdriver Day 1.) The problem as I see it is that in that situation the scum were not going to kill you whether you claimed or not. If you had managed to get the town to fully believe you with you with only the character claim, then sure it would have been a decent move as you would have become a target for the scum. However, once it became clear that the half claim wasn't going to dispel the suspicion on you then there really wasn't any reason to hold that back anymore. But whatever...
One thing I still don't understand though is what changed you to decide to give it up today?
jonty125 wrote:vote new guy1 For deciding we should pressure nag to claim because he targeted edocsil (nothing scummy in that). For then expecting him to be a tracker, even when crazy had already claimed to be it. Your logic been [paraphrase] he might have had important information[/paraphrase] surely he would step forward and claim anyhow. You then question where we would have gone, as if its brain surgery. We would have gone for someone scummy, namely yourself.
jonty125 wrote:vote new guy1 For deciding we should pressure nag to claim because he targeted edocsil (nothing scummy in that). For then expecting him to be a tracker, even when crazy had already claimed to be it. Your logic been [paraphrase] he might have had important information[/paraphrase] surely he would step forward and claim anyhow. You then question where we would have gone, as if its brain surgery. We would have gone for someone scummy, namely yourself.
nagerous wrote:jonty125 wrote:vote new guy1 For deciding we should pressure nag to claim because he targeted edocsil (nothing scummy in that). For then expecting him to be a tracker, even when crazy had already claimed to be it. Your logic been [paraphrase] he might have had important information[/paraphrase] surely he would step forward and claim anyhow. You then question where we would have gone, as if its brain surgery. We would have gone for someone scummy, namely yourself.
If edocsil died then fair enough, but edocsil is alive and well, agreed - it is not in the town's best interest to try and pry further information out of me at this stage.
jonty125 wrote:vote new guy1 For deciding we should pressure nag to claim because he targeted edocsil (nothing scummy in that). For then expecting him to be a tracker, even when crazy had already claimed to be it. Your logic been [paraphrase] he might have had important information[/paraphrase] surely he would step forward and claim anyhow. You then question where we would have gone, as if its brain surgery. We would have gone for someone scummy, namely yourself.
new guy1 wrote:nagerous wrote:jonty125 wrote:vote new guy1 For deciding we should pressure nag to claim because he targeted edocsil (nothing scummy in that). For then expecting him to be a tracker, even when crazy had already claimed to be it. Your logic been [paraphrase] he might have had important information[/paraphrase] surely he would step forward and claim anyhow. You then question where we would have gone, as if its brain surgery. We would have gone for someone scummy, namely yourself.
If edocsil died then fair enough, but edocsil is alive and well, agreed - it is not in the town's best interest to try and pry further information out of me at this stage.
Thats all I wanted to know, and jonty, tell me then if I didnt give a suggestion on where to go. WHO was scummy? My logic being "He may have important info" is what if he was a watcher? What if he was a poison doctor? What if he was a cop? Leaving out all of the posibilities that could have yielded information just to jump on a case that is dying already? I just rephrased for / that I wanted to know if he had info, NOT A DAMN CLAIM. I wont vote you, but I will FOS you for seemingly skimming over the whole end of the arguement. Surely he would step forward? Yeah, and I was saying maybe we should look at him for some information, since we know he went somewhere. What is the problem with saying "hey, maybe we should see if he has information" before he posts if he has infomation or not? If its not brain surgery, then I guess you already had someone on your mind to question, right? I mean, since its not brain surgery and there was obviously something scummy already posted. Otherwise the game would have gone silent till people were posting random things, right? Im asking lots of questions in this because I need answers myself, since apparently my solution to the problem is wrong.
ghostly447 wrote:jonty125 wrote:vote new guy1 For deciding we should pressure nag to claim because he targeted edocsil (nothing scummy in that). For then expecting him to be a tracker, even when crazy had already claimed to be it. Your logic been [paraphrase] he might have had important information[/paraphrase] surely he would step forward and claim anyhow. You then question where we would have gone, as if its brain surgery. We would have gone for someone scummy, namely yourself.
Unlike new guy1 being so kind as to refrain from a vote, I do not take kindly to skimming. Unvote vote Jonty. Name a player you would have pressured. Nag did not respond for a while, and I was suspecting poison doctor since I dont know his situation and after 4-5 pages, had no response to New Guy1's beckoning.
So then Jonty, please also explain to me how you havent seen that All votes and unvotes (this is not an unvote) must be in blue. Still skimming since what, the first post in the game? Everyone else got with the picture, and here you are skimming skimming skimming.
ghostly447 wrote:jonty125 wrote:vote new guy1 For deciding we should pressure nag to claim because he targeted edocsil (nothing scummy in that). For then expecting him to be a tracker, even when crazy had already claimed to be it. Your logic been [paraphrase] he might have had important information[/paraphrase] surely he would step forward and claim anyhow. You then question where we would have gone, as if its brain surgery. We would have gone for someone scummy, namely yourself.
Unlike new guy1 being so kind as to refrain from a vote, I do not take kindly to skimming. Unvote vote Jonty. Name a player you would have pressured. Nag did not respond for a while, and I was suspecting poison doctor since I dont know his situation and after 4-5 pages, had no response to New Guy1's beckoning.
So then Jonty, please also explain to me how you havent seen that All votes and unvotes (this is not an unvote) must be in blue. Still skimming since what, the first post in the game? Everyone else got with the picture, and here you are skimming skimming skimming.
betiko wrote:jonty125 wrote:vote new guy1 For deciding we should pressure nag to claim because he targeted edocsil (nothing scummy in that). For then expecting him to be a tracker, even when crazy had already claimed to be it. Your logic been [paraphrase] he might have had important information[/paraphrase] surely he would step forward and claim anyhow. You then question where we would have gone, as if its brain surgery. We would have gone for someone scummy, namely yourself.
since when can't there be 2 trackers in a same game? already happened to me in a game modded by crazymilkshake.
new guy1 wrote:nagerous wrote:jonty125 wrote:vote new guy1 For deciding we should pressure nag to claim because he targeted edocsil (nothing scummy in that). For then expecting him to be a tracker, even when crazy had already claimed to be it. Your logic been [paraphrase] he might have had important information[/paraphrase] surely he would step forward and claim anyhow. You then question where we would have gone, as if its brain surgery. We would have gone for someone scummy, namely yourself.
If edocsil died then fair enough, but edocsil is alive and well, agreed - it is not in the town's best interest to try and pry further information out of me at this stage.
Thats all I wanted to know, and jonty, tell me then if I didnt give a suggestion on where to go. WHO was scummy? My logic being "He may have important info" is what if he was a watcher? What if he was a poison doctor? What if he was a cop? Leaving out all of the posibilities that could have yielded information just to jump on a case that is dying already? I just rephrased for / that I wanted to know if he had info, NOT A DAMN CLAIM.
Well given that there has actually been a discussion on this subject, you must either not have read that discussion (thus skimming?) or forgot about it.jonty125 wrote:So you're calling skimming that I use red to vote, as that is standard. . I can't say who I would have pressured but I certainnly would have looked through D1.
Gillipig wrote:You guys are voting me for inactivity right? Fair enough. I'll be more active.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users