Moderator: Community Team
TA1LGUNN3R wrote:theherkman wrote:Streaker wrote:Vote theherkman for posting that picture again.
Any news on Night 0 actions?
Nope. Still waiting for a cop to post. Or they investigated a townie...
Or maybe they are wanting to hold back until we get a good idea what the setup is. If the cop tips his hand this early, but there's two factions or many scum, then we lose the cop N1.
-Tails
Streaker wrote:Fuzzylogic99 wrote:i gues the story does matter alot though a good story can make the game more interesting
I hate day one bc its pretty much a crap shoot.i mean it more likely than not you going to lynch a innocent than a mafia but you have to lynch someone
else you give the mafia a better chance .
Well as long as Michael Jackson is not part of the dancing Zombies I think I think the whole Zombie thing will not be tooo bad
Ever play Plants vs Zombies ?![]()
Still a lot of votes uncounted for, and no news on the first night actions
TA1LGUNN3R wrote:/ wrote:she had no white meat if you know what I mean.
vote Slash for not being an equal opportunity ladies man.
-Tails
safariguy5 wrote:I know you're probably new to this Streaker, but we already explained why nobody would probably come forward and claim. I joke voted you before, but this is the most suspicious thing I've seen so far, so my vote is on you for real this time. It sounds like you're trying to see if you can flush out a cop or investigative role.
theherkman wrote:Nope. Still waiting for a cop to post. Or they investigated a townie...
theherkman wrote:Did you investigate Skoffin for scum or no?
Commander9 wrote:And if what, Naxus hit the nail straight on the head - no need to prolong if all actions were received.
Skoffin wrote:[color=#FF0000] Don't science me, missy!
Commander9 wrote:
P.s. If there will be any mistakes, they will be fixed. As of yet, I've not seen any. If you're having problems with mathematics, feel free to go to the first page and see how many players have signed up.
MeDeFe wrote:Hah! Science doesn't even have a definition of what it is to be alive. Or rather, it has two dozen of them.
theherkman wrote:Since I have Campin_Killer foed this could be a long game... Ugh...
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
safariguy5 wrote:
I know you're probably new to this Streaker, but we already explained why nobody would probably come forward and claim. I joke voted you before, but this is the most suspicious thing I've seen so far, so my vote is on you for real this time. It sounds like you're trying to see if you can flush out a cop or investigative role.
Streaker wrote:safariguy5 wrote:
I know you're probably new to this Streaker, but we already explained why nobody would probably come forward and claim. I joke voted you before, but this is the most suspicious thing I've seen so far, so my vote is on you for real this time. It sounds like you're trying to see if you can flush out a cop or investigative role.
I see what you mean. After rereading it alltogether, I can only say it could seem scummy. Yes, I'm new, so I don't know how these games usually get to a lynch on day 1. I can only assume it's because some kind of evidence is revealed.
Now I can say we can go for a No lynch day 1, but that would also seem scummy, no?
The way I see it, a random vote has equal chances of lynching scum or town, so it's not a good thing?
edocsil wrote:theherkman wrote:Since I have Campin_Killer foed this could be a long game... Ugh...
What is the point of saying this? More to the point why foe him, seems like a decent guy to me...
Streaker wrote:safariguy5 wrote:I know you're probably new to this Streaker, but we already explained why nobody would probably come forward and claim. I joke voted you before, but this is the most suspicious thing I've seen so far, so my vote is on you for real this time. It sounds like you're trying to see if you can flush out a cop or investigative role.
I see what you mean. After rereading it alltogether, I can only say it could seem scummy. Yes, I'm new, so I don't know how these games usually get to a lynch on day 1. I can only assume it's because some kind of evidence is revealed.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
MeDeFe wrote:Streaker wrote:safariguy5 wrote:I know you're probably new to this Streaker, but we already explained why nobody would probably come forward and claim. I joke voted you before, but this is the most suspicious thing I've seen so far, so my vote is on you for real this time. It sounds like you're trying to see if you can flush out a cop or investigative role.
I see what you mean. After rereading it alltogether, I can only say it could seem scummy. Yes, I'm new, so I don't know how these games usually get to a lynch on day 1. I can only assume it's because some kind of evidence is revealed.
Usually it's because of some minor detail in what someone posted. People start picking on that detail, questioning the poster, people agree to vote for that person, votes accumulate, when they're at L-1 or -2 people stop voting and let them roleclaim, depending on what they claimed they will be lynched if noone believes them, or there may be a counterclaim and they are lynched all the same, or people will unvote and start looking for a new target.
Currently the minor detail is things that look like trying to get a cop to out themselves. It's a little better than randomly picking someone to lynch.
Streaker wrote:MeDeFe wrote:Streaker wrote:safariguy5 wrote:I know you're probably new to this Streaker, but we already explained why nobody would probably come forward and claim. I joke voted you before, but this is the most suspicious thing I've seen so far, so my vote is on you for real this time. It sounds like you're trying to see if you can flush out a cop or investigative role.
I see what you mean. After rereading it alltogether, I can only say it could seem scummy. Yes, I'm new, so I don't know how these games usually get to a lynch on day 1. I can only assume it's because some kind of evidence is revealed.
Usually it's because of some minor detail in what someone posted. People start picking on that detail, questioning the poster, people agree to vote for that person, votes accumulate, when they're at L-1 or -2 people stop voting and let them roleclaim, depending on what they claimed they will be lynched if noone believes them, or there may be a counterclaim and they are lynched all the same, or people will unvote and start looking for a new target.
Currently the minor detail is things that look like trying to get a cop to out themselves. It's a little better than randomly picking someone to lynch.
Sigh. At the time I wrote that, I didn't fully understand the details. I would really like to hide behind the fact that I'm new, at this point. I understand it's the only clue in the game for now, but there are still a number of people to post in here, so let's wait and see what happens.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
pmchugh wrote:If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that
Campin_Killer wrote:safariguy5 wrote:I know you're probably new to this Streaker, but we already explained why nobody would probably come forward and claim. I joke voted you before, but this is the most suspicious thing I've seen so far, so my vote is on you for real this time. It sounds like you're trying to see if you can flush out a cop or investigative role.
Theherkman was doing the same thing, and he has played a couple of games.
Almost all newbs seem to do that, lolI mean I advocated for a no lynch and random bandwagoning... =D
aage wrote:@Squirrel: new players stay new if you keep killing 'em.
pmchugh wrote:If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that
aage wrote:Mr. Squirrel wrote:sooooo we are just giving all the relatively new players a free pass for today? Seems a bit off to me......
new players stay new if you keep killing 'em.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
Skoffin wrote:...Chillin', lurkin' like a mofo...
Users browsing this forum: No registered users