jonty125 wrote:DoomYoshi wrote:@jonty: I know what you mean. I also have difficulty picking the scum out in this large of a game.
Is this the first thing I've done right in this game?
other than voting for scummy Metsfanmax?
Moderator: Community Team
jonty125 wrote:DoomYoshi wrote:@jonty: I know what you mean. I also have difficulty picking the scum out in this large of a game.
Is this the first thing I've done right in this game?
Metsfanmax wrote:Again, I'm not trying to start a bandwagon against safari. I do think he didn't explain well why he immediately thought cult recruiter when there was only an implication of a third party, but for all I know that's just because that's how it works in most mafia games. However, assuming he is indeed the experienced mafia player that he claims to be, I really doubt that if he is part of a cult, he would make such an obvious mistake and give that away on page one, which is why I'm not pursuing the case.
safariguy5 wrote:vote Hank44Soccer until he decides that posting more than once per mafia day is acceptable. Seriously.
Also, just looking at the scene, I think there's a possible cult recruiter out there.
...
Could be McGill, could be the FW peeps, but we should definitely be aware of this.
Metsfanmax wrote:May I remind you that this is the entire content of the "fairly lengthy" post?safariguy5 wrote:vote Hank44Soccer until he decides that posting more than once per mafia day is acceptable. Seriously.
Also, just looking at the scene, I think there's a possible cult recruiter out there.
...
Could be McGill, could be the FW peeps, but we should definitely be aware of this.
So yeah, I'm pretty sure he did immediately jump to cult recruiter, as in fact this was his first post in the thread.
everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.
everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.
shieldgenerator7 wrote:Mets, hank only thought you were suspicious for voting the mod (you gotta admit, that was kind of cheesy).
Hank44Soccer wrote:jonty125 wrote:Is this the first thing I've done right in this game?
other than voting for scummy Metsfanmax?
DoomYoshi wrote:Originally I had voted since I was suspicious. The only reason I hadn't unvoted yet was because I didn't have a better candidate yet. And just to mess with saf also. The second vote can hardly be called bandwagoning. Although I am leaning towards an unvote as I see Hank is actually playing like he normally does.
Last night, I was extremely tired but unable to sleep. I'm sorry if my vote for Hank didn't make a lot of sense - I am having trouble justifying it to myself even.
@jonty: I know what you mean. I also have difficulty picking the scum out in this large of a game.
Metsfanmax wrote:shieldgenerator7 wrote:Mets, hank only thought you were suspicious for voting the mod (you gotta admit, that was kind of cheesy).
Right, and we were still in the jokevoting part at that time. But we're well past that phase now, and he's still making comments likeHank44Soccer wrote:jonty125 wrote:Is this the first thing I've done right in this game?
other than voting for scummy Metsfanmax?
firth4eva wrote:Players
# Pancakemix
Then again, my suspiscions are not worth much with this many players not posting for so long. Anyone else think they should be prodded?
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
shieldgenerator7 wrote:I agree with jonty. Vote Safariguy
jonty125 wrote:unvote vote: safariguy5 not for the 1st time.
shieldgenerator7 wrote:I agree with jonty. Vote Safariguy
jonty125 wrote:FOS safari based on these last two posts.
DoomYoshi wrote:Metsfanmax wrote:May I remind you that this is the entire content of the "fairly lengthy" post?safariguy5 wrote:vote Hank44Soccer until he decides that posting more than once per mafia day is acceptable. Seriously.
Also, just looking at the scene, I think there's a possible cult recruiter out there.
...
Could be McGill, could be the FW peeps, but we should definitely be aware of this.
So yeah, I'm pretty sure he did immediately jump to cult recruiter, as in fact this was his first post in the thread.
Oh yes, my bad. I was looking at his explanation of roles post. I see what you mean.
shieldgenerator7 wrote:safariguy5 wrote:vote Hank44Soccer until he decides that posting more than once per mafia day is acceptable. Seriously.
Also, just looking at the scene, I think there's a possible cult recruiter out there.TheSaxlad wrote:Day 1
Andy looked out over his new dominion... All felt, well just right. What they didn't know was that AndyDufresne was a more than apt name for him, as a convict he had decided to take a new walk of life, and decided that he liked it. He liked the Power of Red and he wanted more. He supposed the other reason was that Lack had a thing for Peanut Butter and with his nut allergy it just wasnt working, Bananas on the Menu!!!
Clapper PMed him his usual briefing report, her ride to Red had been pretty slick as well, all slick and ready to go, except for that pesky Lackattack and TheSaxlad causing the usual bother, also I've heard reports of another group, but nothing too big, we'll crush them easily. All Of them. Andy sat back, he couldn't remember it ever being this good.
On the other hand Lack and his Team were preparing for that day, "script?" Check. "Cybergun?" Check. "Fake Banana?" "No but ive got this thing that..."
Day 1 Begin!
Could be McGill, could be the FW peeps, but we should definitely be aware of this.
I think you picked up on that especially because you're one of them. Unvote Vote safari
firth4eva wrote:You hadn't posted since page 7 at least.
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
Hank44Soccer wrote:Metsfanmax wrote:shieldgenerator7 wrote:Mets, hank only thought you were suspicious for voting the mod (you gotta admit, that was kind of cheesy).
Right, and we were still in the jokevoting part at that time. But we're well past that phase now, and he's still making comments likeHank44Soccer wrote:jonty125 wrote:Is this the first thing I've done right in this game?
other than voting for scummy Metsfanmax?
Yah Sorry for being out of hand Vote SafariGuy5
firth4eva wrote:Streaker wrote:That's one way to get the game going right there. Demanding to start hunting, pointing a player out on a joke vote (ZING!) only to post like 6 or 7 completely meaningless posts straight after. You gotta know what you want, dude. Either you stay in joke vote fase, or you get serious. But don't call people out on joking around when you won't contribute anything yourself. ZING!
This argument is weak at best. It's day one, and hank looks more like he's joking around than trying to waste time in order to benefit the mafia. This doesnt warrant a vote though. So hank, start getting serious. Streaker unvote.
firth4eva wrote:DoomYoshi wrote:Streaker, you have me convinced. To be honest, I had stopped believing the arguments for saf a while ago. I was just staying on him so he would reclaim, which is what he suggested I do. Just stop with the ZING please. Or at least be more careful where you aim that thing.
unvote vote hank
Bandwagoning again? Admitting to voting someone despite not being suspiscious of them(I know it's day one but there is a clear issue on whether it is suspiscious that safari pointed it out)?
unvote vote yoshi
Hank44Soccer wrote:jonty125 wrote:DoomYoshi wrote:@jonty: I know what you mean. I also have difficulty picking the scum out in this large of a game.
Is this the first thing I've done right in this game?
other than voting for scummy Metsfanmax?
Hank44Soccer wrote:Yah Sorry for being out of hand Vote SafariGuy5
Bleed_Green wrote:Sorry I have been so swamped at work that I am really getting behind in this game,, I am recalling my joke for saf and hopefully in the next couple will catch up full. I have skimmed through and there are some pretty interesting reads so UNVOTE
Users browsing this forum: No registered users