Moderator: Community Team
safariguy5 wrote:I'd also like to add, metagaming a bit here, that Night 0 ending so quickly probably means that active players in the mafia subforum probably have investigative roles. While I understand this means most of us, I'd like to point out that someone like tdans who's more active in other forums probably isn't an investigative role. Just bringing this up because we can learn something from an unusually short night period.
theherkman wrote:UNVOTE
VOTE Skoffin
Skoffin wrote:theherkman wrote:UNVOTE
VOTE Skoffin
Just curious, but is this a joke vote or did you take what I wrote seriously?
I don't know about you lot but I am going to completely ignore the timing of night 0 and when it ended. I think it a terrible idea to try to assume what people could have been online and thus could have had a role for it, plus all it takes is someone claiming "I think that guy was on at that time.." and fuzzy memories to send us into circling arguments. And really, if such an accusation were made, how would anyone defend on it? "Oh it couldn't have been me I was asleep at the time"? It has no game basis so I don't feel it appropriate to discuss in terms of lynching people.
Haggis_McMutton wrote:2. Anyone else find it kind of funny that naxus is NK'd right after insisting that we're all paranoid?
safariguy5 wrote:I'd also like to add, metagaming a bit here, that Night 0 ending so quickly probably means that active players in the mafia subforum probably have investigative roles. While I understand this means most of us, I'd like to point out that someone like tdans who's more active in other forums probably isn't an investigative role. Just bringing this up because we can learn something from an unusually short night period.
pmchugh wrote:If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that
theherkman wrote:safariguy5 wrote:I'd also like to add, metagaming a bit here, that Night 0 ending so quickly probably means that active players in the mafia subforum probably have investigative roles. While I understand this means most of us, I'd like to point out that someone like tdans who's more active in other forums probably isn't an investigative role. Just bringing this up because we can learn something from an unusually short night period.
What the f*ck, man? Are you trying to put the attention on cops or what? Seriously, why would you do that?
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
Iliad wrote:And the end of times is here. Thoughts:
Trying to guess at the setup, or who the night 0 people were, is in my opinion premature. There are far too many options right now, so it's kinda pointless. However when we do get more useful info from deaths and scenes, we can. At this point in time, trying to guess if there are multiple mafias, town groups or whatever is basically a waste of time.
We should be looking at the usual, ie people's behaviour. In regards to giving inexperienced players free passes, I'm not a huge fan, but you can usually tell when a scumtell is instead a tell of inexperience.
Fircoal wrote:MeDeFe wrote:aage wrote:Mr. Squirrel wrote:sooooo we are just giving all the relatively new players a free pass for today? Seems a bit off to me......
new players stay new if you keep killing 'em.
Yeah, but on the other hand, if we give them a free pass, how will they ever learn?
Then again, I suppose it wouldn't hurt to put pressure on one of the more quiet people, has anyone kept tabs on the submariners? (I'm too lazy)
The game started not even 2 days ago and you want to look for scumariners? Sounds like someones a bit edger to get a target for lynch.
safariguy5 wrote:Ok, if you really want someone who hasn't posted yet MeDeFe, Iliad hasn't said anything if I remember correctly.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
tdans wrote:I think I am doing all this wrong....... idk
safariguy5 wrote:I'd also like to add, metagaming a bit here, that Night 0 ending so quickly probably means that active players in the mafia subforum probably have investigative roles. While I understand this means most of us, I'd like to point out that someone like tdans who's more active in other forums probably isn't an investigative role. Just bringing this up because we can learn something from an unusually short night period.
Mr. Squirrel wrote:I don't see why everyone thinks and investigator would have a Night 0 action. Think about it, an investigator is the last role that you want to give an early action to if you are the mod. It is game-breaking.
Mr. Squirrel wrote:If you ask me, Night 0 is meant for the cult faction (assuming there is one). Rather than risk the possibility of losing day 1, he gave the cult leader one early recruit. And if there is only one action Commander needs to receive, that easily explains why night 0 was so quick.
Fuzzylogic99 wrote:is there a time limit on the day or is till someone get lynch.dont remember reading anything about that.
Fuzzylogic99 wrote:i honestly still believe that we did not have a night zero but that's not here nor there.
Fuzzylogic99 wrote:Vote Jerando
non active player plus its day 1 so its a guess vote anyways
Thezzaruz wrote:Fuzzylogic99 wrote:Vote Jerando
non active player plus its day 1 so its a guess vote anyways
You pick a guy that had posted on the same page as the non active when there was people that hadn't posted at all???
Me thinks fuzzy is being a bit too fuzzy in his logic to get away with it tbh.
UnVote, Vote Fuzzylogic99.
Fuzzylogic99 wrote:Hmm I have to relook but I swore that he/she did not post before I voted for him.Then again I kind of scanned the post so I think I might of missed
him/her posting.Anyways he/she is active so Im not going to vote for them.
Hey Jerando do you hate me bc I hate you I dont know why. My role message that I hate Jerando.I thought this was an kind of odd statement for a mafia game.
UNVOTE Jerando
safariguy5 wrote:Fuzzylogic99 wrote:Hmm I have to relook but I swore that he/she did not post before I voted for him.Then again I kind of scanned the post so I think I might of missed
him/her posting.Anyways he/she is active so Im not going to vote for them.
Hey Jerando do you hate me bc I hate you I dont know why. My role message that I hate Jerando.I thought this was an kind of odd statement for a mafia game.
UNVOTE Jerando
Sounds like this could be a lyncher role.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users