Moderator: Community Team

What the f*ck, man? Are you trying to put the attention on cops or what? Seriously, why would you do that?safariguy5 wrote:I'd also like to add, metagaming a bit here, that Night 0 ending so quickly probably means that active players in the mafia subforum probably have investigative roles. While I understand this means most of us, I'd like to point out that someone like tdans who's more active in other forums probably isn't an investigative role. Just bringing this up because we can learn something from an unusually short night period.
Just curious, but is this a joke vote or did you take what I wrote seriously?theherkman wrote:UNVOTE
VOTE Skoffin

Skoffin wrote:Just curious, but is this a joke vote or did you take what I wrote seriously?theherkman wrote:UNVOTE
VOTE Skoffin
I don't know about you lot but I am going to completely ignore the timing of night 0 and when it ended. I think it a terrible idea to try to assume what people could have been online and thus could have had a role for it, plus all it takes is someone claiming "I think that guy was on at that time.." and fuzzy memories to send us into circling arguments. And really, if such an accusation were made, how would anyone defend on it? "Oh it couldn't have been me I was asleep at the time"? It has no game basis so I don't feel it appropriate to discuss in terms of lynching people.

Haggis_McMutton wrote:2. Anyone else find it kind of funny that naxus is NK'd right after insisting that we're all paranoid?
I don't see why everyone thinks and investigator would have a Night 0 action. Think about it, an investigator is the last role that you want to give an early action to if you are the mod. It is game-breaking. For one, since no one has even posted yet, the cop is just randomly picking who to investigate, which is not how investigations are supposed to run. And if the cop gets really lucky and actually finds scum, it would ruin the game for the scum player. How would you like to read, "confirm. hey guys, cop here, player X is scum. Got him night 0." Player X becomes the instant lynch target before he ever even posts. How f*ed up would that be?safariguy5 wrote:I'd also like to add, metagaming a bit here, that Night 0 ending so quickly probably means that active players in the mafia subforum probably have investigative roles. While I understand this means most of us, I'd like to point out that someone like tdans who's more active in other forums probably isn't an investigative role. Just bringing this up because we can learn something from an unusually short night period.
pmchugh wrote: If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that

I agree with Herkyderky's arggesive questioning for once. You may say that you're trying to find out who's not a cop but THAT JUST MAKES IT EASIER FOR MAFIA TO KILL OUR COPS. There is no town reason to try to guess who has what role besides who is scum and who is town (unless it is late in the game and you need to get out a specific faction (Which it's not)).theherkman wrote:What the f*ck, man? Are you trying to put the attention on cops or what? Seriously, why would you do that?safariguy5 wrote:I'd also like to add, metagaming a bit here, that Night 0 ending so quickly probably means that active players in the mafia subforum probably have investigative roles. While I understand this means most of us, I'd like to point out that someone like tdans who's more active in other forums probably isn't an investigative role. Just bringing this up because we can learn something from an unusually short night period.
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
Iliad wrote:And the end of times is here. Thoughts:
Trying to guess at the setup, or who the night 0 people were, is in my opinion premature. There are far too many options right now, so it's kinda pointless. However when we do get more useful info from deaths and scenes, we can. At this point in time, trying to guess if there are multiple mafias, town groups or whatever is basically a waste of time.
We should be looking at the usual, ie people's behaviour. In regards to giving inexperienced players free passes, I'm not a huge fan, but you can usually tell when a scumtell is instead a tell of inexperience.
48 hours is plenty of time on conquerclub to check the fora and post even so shortly before new year's eve. A complete lack of posts in that time is, though not clear-cut scummy, at least noteworthy.Fircoal wrote:The game started not even 2 days ago and you want to look for scumariners? Sounds like someones a bit edger to get a target for lynch.MeDeFe wrote:Yeah, but on the other hand, if we give them a free pass, how will they ever learn?aage wrote:new players stay new if you keep killing 'em.Mr. Squirrel wrote:sooooo we are just giving all the relatively new players a free pass for today? Seems a bit off to me......
Then again, I suppose it wouldn't hurt to put pressure on one of the more quiet people, has anyone kept tabs on the submariners? (I'm too lazy)
You're right, Iliad hasn't posted anything yet, well, he hadn't when you posted, at least he got active now. But your post on metagaming is quite unlike you and surely the biggest blip on the radar to date. First you point to the explanation why it's not a good idea for cops to come forward, if they indeed had actions on Night 0. http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... 5#p2937445safariguy5 wrote:Ok, if you really want someone who hasn't posted yet MeDeFe, Iliad hasn't said anything if I remember correctly.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
Yes you are... Vote tdanstdans wrote:I think I am doing all this wrong....... idk
Firstly I think you are reading way too much into the N0 and secondly the conclusions you are trying to draw from it are no only horribly uncertain guesstimates but also thoroughly unwanted (at least at this point in time).safariguy5 wrote:I'd also like to add, metagaming a bit here, that Night 0 ending so quickly probably means that active players in the mafia subforum probably have investigative roles. While I understand this means most of us, I'd like to point out that someone like tdans who's more active in other forums probably isn't an investigative role. Just bringing this up because we can learn something from an unusually short night period.
Actually not. Some mafia cultures regularly starts their games with a night phase to allow events to take place before talking/voting starts as they think it promotes better discussion as opposed to the mainly random BWs that is usually the trademark of a game that starts with a day phase. It's not a game breaker as long as the Mod plans for using a N0 phase (be it a limited one or not).Mr. Squirrel wrote:I don't see why everyone thinks and investigator would have a Night 0 action. Think about it, an investigator is the last role that you want to give an early action to if you are the mod. It is game-breaking.
I'm not sure it was specifically a cult recruit only but I do agree that it is likely to have been a very limited number of people that had a N0 action and that the length of N0 holds no relevance.Mr. Squirrel wrote:If you ask me, Night 0 is meant for the cult faction (assuming there is one). Rather than risk the possibility of losing day 1, he gave the cult leader one early recruit. And if there is only one action Commander needs to receive, that easily explains why night 0 was so quick.
Usually no time limit until the Mod decides he wants one and thus announces a deadline.Fuzzylogic99 wrote:is there a time limit on the day or is till someone get lynch.dont remember reading anything about that.
Well you would say that if trying to mask that you in fact had a N0 action wouldn't you?Fuzzylogic99 wrote:i honestly still believe that we did not have a night zero but that's not here nor there.
You pick a guy that had posted on the same page as the non active when there was people that hadn't posted at all???Fuzzylogic99 wrote:Vote Jerando
non active player plus its day 1 so its a guess vote anyways
lol I wanted to say this but didnt want to be accused of OMGUS-ingThezzaruz wrote:You pick a guy that had posted on the same page as the non active when there was people that hadn't posted at all???Fuzzylogic99 wrote:Vote Jerando
non active player plus its day 1 so its a guess vote anyways
Me thinks fuzzy is being a bit too fuzzy in his logic to get away with it tbh.
UnVote, Vote Fuzzylogic99.

Sounds like this could be a lyncher role.Fuzzylogic99 wrote:Hmm I have to relook but I swore that he/she did not post before I voted for him.Then again I kind of scanned the post so I think I might of missed
him/her posting.Anyways he/she is active so Im not going to vote for them.
Hey Jerando do you hate me bc I hate you I dont know why. My role message that I hate Jerando.I thought this was an kind of odd statement for a mafia game.
UNVOTE Jerando



Was just thinking the same thing.safariguy5 wrote:Sounds like this could be a lyncher role.Fuzzylogic99 wrote:Hmm I have to relook but I swore that he/she did not post before I voted for him.Then again I kind of scanned the post so I think I might of missed
him/her posting.Anyways he/she is active so Im not going to vote for them.
Hey Jerando do you hate me bc I hate you I dont know why. My role message that I hate Jerando.I thought this was an kind of odd statement for a mafia game.
UNVOTE Jerando
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.