Moderator: Community Team
diddle wrote:Hank44Soccer wrote:Rivalries- it appears that rivalries have alrady (spelt wrong) appeared. Who will be lynched? Could it be Diddle or will I take heat for posting this? (ok, so why has he mentioned me here? I'm the only person he mentions in the whole post, and this is just after I removed my FOS from him) Who knows what the future will bring. Will somebody post a no no, will diddle get put where he deserves along with any other scum? (So now I'm scum? Where's the basis for this accusation? Hank was worried someone would say a no-no, and I think he just has) Who knows how this will turn out but with any luck the scum will be lynched. NOW WHO'S WITH ME!!!!![]()
![]()
(So now in his defence he tries to make himself seem anti-scum in the most obvious way, its pathetic. Its like sitting at home watching the news and saying 'oh, i do hope that serial rapist gets caught' - well of course you do! you're not going to blurt out that you hope he runs free and continues raping, because that would only make others suspicious of you being a rapist!).
diddle wrote:But I'm not scum? Plus, I currently have two people voting for me, so it would be impossible to choose one to vote for in return (since at this point in the game votes can never be backed up with any real substance, bar the knowledge of a day cop, which is unlikely) as well as being incredibly stupid. Clutching at straws a bit are we VioIet? Desperate for a lynch hmmmmm?
aage wrote:diddle wrote:Hank44Soccer wrote:Rivalries- it appears that rivalries have alrady (spelt wrong) appeared. Who will be lynched? Could it be Diddle or will I take heat for posting this? (ok, so why has he mentioned me here? I'm the only person he mentions in the whole post, and this is just after I removed my FOS from him) Who knows what the future will bring. Will somebody post a no no, will diddle get put where he deserves along with any other scum? (So now I'm scum? Where's the basis for this accusation? Hank was worried someone would say a no-no, and I think he just has) Who knows how this will turn out but with any luck the scum will be lynched. NOW WHO'S WITH ME!!!!![]()
![]()
(So now in his defence he tries to make himself seem anti-scum in the most obvious way, its pathetic. Its like sitting at home watching the news and saying 'oh, i do hope that serial rapist gets caught' - well of course you do! you're not going to blurt out that you hope he runs free and continues raping, because that would only make others suspicious of you being a rapist!).
This post alone is worth a lynch imo. Hank does not seem like an experienced player at all, actually this is the first game I've ever seen him in, and the post he made is already proving his inexperience. Even if he were scum, this post wouldn't have gotten him anywhere near lynching Diddle. Still, Diddle seems to take this post as serious as any well built-up accusation. Just look at the post I'm quoting up here. Hank pulls a joke on who to lynch (since the game was in a so-called joke voting stage, in which players make jokes), unfortunately includes Diddle in his post, probably based on this:diddle wrote:But I'm not scum? Plus, I currently have two people voting for me, so it would be impossible to choose one to vote for in return (since at this point in the game votes can never be backed up with any real substance, bar the knowledge of a day cop, which is unlikely) as well as being incredibly stupid. Clutching at straws a bit are we VioIet? Desperate for a lynch hmmmmm?
Hank already mentions in his post: "Who will be lynched? Could it be Diddle or will I take heat for posting this?" This part alone should already prove that he is pulling a joke and knows what he's doing (since he mentions taking the heat for posting "this").
And still diddle, you seem to want to build a complete case out of it. During day 1 already he was slightly wagonned for this by Hank himself and DoomYoshi. Tails' vote was there as well but he claimed to have put it on VioIet who was diddle's opposition.
As on Kernov, I'd also be interested in his action last night.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
Anarkistsdream wrote:Sorry Kernov... You're not the 1955 Doc Brown, because I am...
Nice lie, man. Did you think there would only be one Doc Brown???
Vote: Kernov
diddle wrote:That's all very well and good, but you keep forgetting that ALL I wanted from Hank was an explanation, or for him to lay off and start taking the game seriously, and I got neither.
kernov wrote:I am 1955 doc Brown! you are either scum and trying to get me lynched or there is 2 , if your not scum Anark unvote me quick please.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
Anarkistsdream wrote:TEEEHEEHEEHEE!!!
I was evil and AAGE helped me!!!
safariguy5 wrote:Yeah, I'd say kernov might be a bit responsible.Still, it's a good learning experience and we all were in his shoes once.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users