Pokemon Endgame: Mafia Victory + jonty

[nagerous]

Freezie are you trying to impute that there is some form of dodgy relationship between me and fissk because that is defamatory and I can sue your ass for that.

Fissk, wow that is not helping your case at all, if you don't buck your ideas up, I'm going to be joining your wagon.

Fastposted by Mr. Fircoal, so I will address your point. Fissk voted a guy for no reason and was instantly jumped upon, he then provided his reasoning but feeling pressure from it unvoted. However a wagon quickly developed with Jonty sneaking in a vote. Whilst Fissk's vote was noobish it didn't initially warrant to me as a scummy, it was brash and I don't think a noob scum would be that brash in a random vote but would instead attempt to blend in. Jonty's vote on the other hand came accross as me as very sly, trying to sneak a vote in and agree with the majority opinion which is a scum tactic, this I did not like.

[naxus]

Harder than a diamond in a ice storm, will read up and post something tommorow(hopefully)

[DoomYoshi]

Vote Count:

Fircoal (1) - shieldgenerator7
Army of God (1) - kratos644
Hank44Soccer (2) - Victor Sullivan, evilchaos
jonty125 (1) - nagerous
Mr. Squirrel (1) - sheepofdumb
nagerous (2) - Fircoal, Army of God
TheFissk (6) - Streaker, shaggydan, ???, jonty125, Mr. Squirrel, freezie L-5
evilchaos (1) - jimfinn

With 21 alive it takes 11 to lynch

[Rodion]

We have a "???" vote on TheFissk.
Perhaps there's a doublevoter out there?

[Hank44Soccer]

We have a "???" vote on TheFissk.
Perhaps there's a doublevoter out there?

If there is we need to find out who!

[DoomYoshi]

Announcement: naxus is replacing karelpietertje

[freezie]

Freezie are you trying to impute that there is some form of dodgy relationship between me and fissk because that is defamatory and I can sue your ass for that.

I am trying to impute that he may be defending his scum mate. Go on and sue me for that..we're all playing mafia here, however.

[nagerous]

We have a "???" vote on TheFissk.
Perhaps there's a doublevoter out there?

If there is we need to find out who!

Why? So you and your scum buddies can kill him off?

[freezie]

We have a "???" vote on TheFissk.
Perhaps there's a doublevoter out there?

If there is we need to find out who!

FoS: Hank

Why? There is no reasons for another claim today, especially not on something that doesn't change a lot on the gameplay...

Doublevoter is very most likely town ( Otherwise it screws the mafia '' outnumber town'' win condition..) and as far as I know isn't going to be a drastic turn on who we're going for..


Why not look out for the doc and cop today as we're at it?

[Army of GOD]

Can't be arsed to read the pages I've missed. Anyway, unvote vote nagerous because he's skummeh

Are you really going to make a vote on someone without doing your research on what has happened?
Vote Army of GOD

Way to tip your hand. unvote vote kratos

He's trying to get people off nag, so he's obviously working with him. I don't like it...smells like scum.

[kratos644]

Can't be arsed to read the pages I've missed. Anyway, unvote vote nagerous because he's skummeh

Are you really going to make a vote on someone without doing your research on what has happened?
Vote Army of GOD

Way to tip your hand. unvote vote kratos

He's trying to get people off nag, so he's obviously working with him. I don't like it...smells like scum.

Or maybe I just found what nag did to be reasonable. He has after all been reading everything so far unlike some... I didn't like that you blatantly stated you weren't going to read everything and decided hey there's already a vote on nag let's hop on that bandwagon. Maybe both you and fircoal are the scum so you were trying to help him out, but I'm not convinced on fircoal maybe it's because he was a pika so I'm biased

Anyway. Like I said I don't like the fact that you'd just choose a vote without reading all the facts.

Edit* Also if I was just trying to get people off nag why wouldn't I vote fircoal? Or I could have even kept on the bandwagon and got a quick lynch then nag would be safe for now. Hell if you had any reason at all for voting nag I probably wouldn't have voted but the fact that you're jumping on random votes without reading strikes something odd to me.

[evilchaos]

We have a "???" vote on TheFissk.
Perhaps there's a doublevoter out there?

If there is we need to find out who!

Why? So you and your scum buddies can kill him off?

I think Hank and Fissk are both scum.

Hank asked a question about "mafia alliances." When asked about it, he said he was wondering about alliances like on Survivor. I'm not sure exactly what that means and how it would apply to mafia, so it remains a suspicious question in my mind. He then went AWOL for a day or so without posting at all. He did not join in the discussion about Fissk's potential scumminess at all. He didn't post again until just now, when he displayed a desire to find the identity of a double voter, a person who is only of interest to scum that don't want to be lynched.

Fissk voted for me immediately after I questioned Hank. He supplied no immediate reason. When questioned on it later, he stated he wanted to see my reaction, which is a rather weak reason in my opinion. He later made this post, which doesn't help his case whatsoever.

Fissk, give me a GREAT reason not to vote on you.

Never do today what you can put off 'til tomorrow
-William Pulteney, Earl of Bath, English MP

I see that you have made three spelling mistakes
-Thomas de Mahay, Marquis de Favras, French aristocrat, his last words upon reading his death sentence before being
guillotined

life is not defined by your achievements but the mistakes you make, don't let this be one.

There is also the issue of Nag defending Fissk with good reasons, but Fissk defending Nag agressively with not so good reasons.

Jonty is a new guy and he is learning, he probably had his reasons and now has come accross as a little scummy. However, I personally think that he is innocent and just trying to hunt leads and play the game. However, you've come accross to me now as just a bandwagon starter trying to get an easy lynch across.

My vote goes on you, unvote vote Nagerous

i think you could have been a little more creative than just copying his post and changing the last sentence but i guess their are time constraints...

plus i have half a mind to vote for you for a similar same reason everyone is bandwagoning me (at least you tried to explain your self) but i'll hold for now...

As I said, I think it's pretty clear they're both scum. For the moment, I'm keeping my vote on Hank.

[Army of GOD]

Can't be arsed to read the pages I've missed. Anyway, unvote vote nagerous because he's skummeh

Are you really going to make a vote on someone without doing your research on what has happened?
Vote Army of GOD

Way to tip your hand. unvote vote kratos

He's trying to get people off nag, so he's obviously working with him. I don't like it...smells like scum.

Or maybe I just found what nag did to be reasonable. He has after all been reading everything so far unlike some... I didn't like that you blatantly stated you weren't going to read everything and decided hey there's already a vote on nag let's hop on that bandwagon. Maybe both you and fircoal are the scum so you were trying to help him out, but I'm not convinced on fircoal maybe it's because he was a pika so I'm biased

Anyway. Like I said I don't like the fact that you'd just choose a vote without reading all the facts.

Edit* Also if I was just trying to get people off nag why wouldn't I vote fircoal? Or I could have even kept on the bandwagon and got a quick lynch then nag would be safe for now. Hell if you had any reason at all for voting nag I probably wouldn't have voted but the fact that you're jumping on random votes without reading strikes something odd to me.

That's some good WIFOM right there.

[kratos644]

Can't be arsed to read the pages I've missed. Anyway, unvote vote nagerous because he's skummeh

Are you really going to make a vote on someone without doing your research on what has happened?
Vote Army of GOD

Way to tip your hand. unvote vote kratos

He's trying to get people off nag, so he's obviously working with him. I don't like it...smells like scum.

Or maybe I just found what nag did to be reasonable. He has after all been reading everything so far unlike some... I didn't like that you blatantly stated you weren't going to read everything and decided hey there's already a vote on nag let's hop on that bandwagon. Maybe both you and fircoal are the scum so you were trying to help him out, but I'm not convinced on fircoal maybe it's because he was a pika so I'm biased

Anyway. Like I said I don't like the fact that you'd just choose a vote without reading all the facts.

Edit* Also if I was just trying to get people off nag why wouldn't I vote fircoal? Or I could have even kept on the bandwagon and got a quick lynch then nag would be safe for now. Hell if you had any reason at all for voting nag I probably wouldn't have voted but the fact that you're jumping on random votes without reading strikes something odd to me.

That's some good WIFOM right there.

Well I could just accuse you of an OMGUS vote instead of giving any explanation at all.

[shieldgenerator7]

after many long hours of figuring I've discovered a formula that knows exactly you chances of winning

simply insert the number below beside you name and solve for X
-1. Fircoal
-2. Streaker
-3. karelpieterje
-4. shieldgenerator7
-5. Victor Sullivan
-6. Army of God
-7. Rodion
-8. Hank44Soccer
-9. shaggydan
-10. sheepofdumb
-11. kratos644
-12. jonty125
-13. Mr. Squirrel
-14. jimfinn
-15. Haggis McMutton
-16. nagerous
-17. freezie
-22. TheFissk
-19. jug68
-20. Commander9
-21. evilchaos

x21+231x20+25025x19+1689765x18+79721796x17+2792167686x16+75289668850x15+1599718388730x14+27188611869881x13+373100999802531x12+4154823851430525x11+37600535086859745x10+276019109275035346x9+1634980697246583456x8+7744654310169576800x7+28939583397335447760x6+83637381699544802976x5+181664979520697076096x4+284093315901811468800x3+298631902863216384000x2+186244810780170240000x+51090942171709440000

I don't find this very funny, nor this:

Fissk, give me a GREAT reason not to vote on you.

Never do today what you can put off 'til tomorrow
-William Pulteney, Earl of Bath, English MP

I see that you have made three spelling mistakes
-Thomas de Mahay, Marquis de Favras, French aristocrat, his last words upon reading his death sentence before being
guillotined

To me, this looks like a scum tactic trying to detract attention from him and his case. I've never played with TheFissk before, and I don't know his experience level, but this looks scummy. Then again, if he's a n00b, he might do these kinds of these cause he doesn't know any better. Fissk, explain yourself or I'm going to vote you. I personally think you're acting more n00bish than scummy, but the fact that you don't defend yourself may indicate your guiltiness.

-SG7 ( )

[jonty125]

We have a "???" vote on TheFissk.
Perhaps there's a doublevoter out there?

If there is we need to find out who!

Explain yourself Hank or your getting my vote.

[DoomYoshi]

I am going to prod jug68 tonight. Any other requests? So far the activity level has been very high, thanks to everyone for that.

[ShaggyDan]

I came here with the intent to vote for fissk due to some jokey / very weak defence posts... but apparantly I already did all the way back in the joke stage.

So posting to say my vote stays on him for his weak defence to the pressure. Though I have to do more of an indepth read it seems like a good lead to follow.

Also FOS Army of God for throwing votes around like... something you throw lots... (and admits to what I assume is joke-voting far after we've passed joke stage).

[evilchaos]

after many long hours of figuring I've discovered a formula that knows exactly you chances of winning

simply insert the number below beside you name and solve for X
-1. Fircoal
-2. Streaker
-3. karelpieterje
-4. shieldgenerator7
-5. Victor Sullivan
-6. Army of God
-7. Rodion
-8. Hank44Soccer
-9. shaggydan
-10. sheepofdumb
-11. kratos644
-12. jonty125
-13. Mr. Squirrel
-14. jimfinn
-15. Haggis McMutton
-16. nagerous
-17. freezie
-22. TheFissk
-19. jug68
-20. Commander9
-21. evilchaos

x21+231x20+25025x19+1689765x18+79721796x17+2792167686x16+75289668850x15+1599718388730x14+27188611869881x13+373100999802531x12+4154823851430525x11+37600535086859745x10+276019109275035346x9+1634980697246583456x8+7744654310169576800x7+28939583397335447760x6+83637381699544802976x5+181664979520697076096x4+284093315901811468800x3+298631902863216384000x2+186244810780170240000x+51090942171709440000

I don't find this very funny, nor this:

Fissk, give me a GREAT reason not to vote on you.

Never do today what you can put off 'til tomorrow
-William Pulteney, Earl of Bath, English MP

I see that you have made three spelling mistakes
-Thomas de Mahay, Marquis de Favras, French aristocrat, his last words upon reading his death sentence before being
guillotined

To me, this looks like a scum tactic trying to detract attention from him and his case. I've never played with TheFissk before, and I don't know his experience level, but this looks scummy. Then again, if he's a n00b, he might do these kinds of these cause he doesn't know any better. Fissk, explain yourself or I'm going to vote you. I personally think you're acting more n00bish than scummy, but the fact that you don't defend yourself may indicate your guiltiness.

-SG7 ( )

I think this is Fissk's first game.

[shieldgenerator7]

that's why I gave him the benefit of the doubt of n00b versus scum

[Victor Sullivan]

viewtopic.php?f=213&t=141268&start=240#p3164253





Unacceptable, sir. vote kratos

-Sully

[jonty125]

Do you mean editing?

[Victor Sullivan]

Do you mean editing?

No, I mean his clever word play and lack of sarcasm.

-Sully

[DoomYoshi]

Can't be arsed to read the pages I've missed. Anyway, unvote vote nagerous because he's skummeh

Are you really going to make a vote on someone without doing your research on what has happened?
Vote Army of GOD

Way to tip your hand. unvote vote kratos

He's trying to get people off nag, so he's obviously working with him. I don't like it...smells like scum.

Or maybe I just found what nag did to be reasonable. He has after all been reading everything so far unlike some... I didn't like that you blatantly stated you weren't going to read everything and decided hey there's already a vote on nag let's hop on that bandwagon. Maybe both you and fircoal are the scum so you were trying to help him out, but I'm not convinced on fircoal maybe it's because he was a pika so I'm biased

Anyway. Like I said I don't like the fact that you'd just choose a vote without reading all the facts.

Edit* Also if I was just trying to get people off nag why wouldn't I vote fircoal? Or I could have even kept on the bandwagon and got a quick lynch then nag would be safe for now. Hell if you had any reason at all for voting nag I probably wouldn't have voted but the fact that you're jumping on random votes without reading strikes something odd to me.

kratos, editing is against the rules. It is strictly forbidden. If you do it again, I have no choice but to modkill you. If you want to edit, quote the original post and create a new post. It doesn't matter if you doublepost.

[kratos644]

Sorry. I didn't realize this being my first game. It won't happen again.