Moderator: Community Team
DoomYoshi wrote:Test it on me. Tree stump is my favorite role anyway lol. Next time I am picking Wispy Woods as my character.
Streaker wrote:I think it's about time for me to switch votes. Only 6 days left for this Day, and spiessr isn't getting enough attention. I still don't like how safari is willing, or even advocating, a No lynch just because 'we have about as much information as a regular Day 1'. Here we have the opportunity to dig deeper on the first Day, yet he is reluctant. Is it that great to go to Night and give mafia their kill? What will we do tomorrow? Just vote no lynch in case we find out a town power role? As Fircoal put it so well, we haven't found out anything about anyone but shield. And he's dead. Not town.
This, and my previous post about safari makes me Unvote, vote safariguy
Does your bulletproof ability extend to daykills as well? Or do you not know?safariguy5 wrote:Alright, I'm Will Dormer from Insomnia, Town Bulletproof. The long days ensure that I'm up all night, thus making me immune from nightkills. However, because I killed my partner, anyone who investigates me will cause me to commit suicide.
spiesr wrote:Does your bulletproof ability extend to daykills as well? Or do you not know?safariguy5 wrote:Alright, I'm Will Dormer from Insomnia, Town Bulletproof. The long days ensure that I'm up all night, thus making me immune from nightkills. However, because I killed my partner, anyone who investigates me will cause me to commit suicide.
Now, is this claim to be believed? Well, it sounds like a plausible role and character. But, if the scum might have fakeclaims then we can never really be sure about a claim.
Safariguy, do you know if you dying upon investigation only applies to cop investigations? I mean, are roles like watchers, tackers, gunsmiths and so on able to target you without you dying?
Uh, oh. This comes awfully close to quoting your role pm in my opinion. Seems like a probably violation of rule 2.safariguy5 wrote:Another interesting thing that I noticed is that I win if all non town factions are eliminated or their vendettas are settled. That means that there are some secondary win conditions, and I'm pretty sure the joker character wants Batman dead.
pancakemix wrote:2. Do not quote any PMs you receive from the Mod. The only things you may post (loosely paraphrasing) are your roles (and anything associated with them), and alignment, during the active game. Once the game has concluded, feel free to post the rest of your personal information. You may not post your win condition, how many words are in your role PM, or any other kind of way to get around not quoting PMs.
safariguy5 wrote:Aw crap...shouldn't have reread my role pm.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
DoomYoshi wrote:Test it on me. Tree stump is my favorite role anyway lol. Next time I am picking Wispy Woods as my character.
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
pancakemix wrote:As much as I hate to do this, safari definitely crossed the line set in rule #2 and will be modkilled. Scene upcoming.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
pancakemix wrote:As much as I hate to do this, safari definitely crossed the line set in rule #2 and will be modkilled. Scene upcoming.
sheepofdumb wrote:Looks pretty close. This is up to pancake but I wouldn't be surprised.
I call bull on that role. Now I know that pancake is taking liberties with the roles (I thought that Teddy would have been an insane cop) but Will is not bulletproof and he does not act pro-town. At the end of the movie he dies in a shootout. If anything Will would be perfect for a 2 man mafia along with Robin Williams.
Vote Safari for an unbelievable role claim.
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
So, Fircoal, did you skim or something? Why where you stating your disbelief in safariguy's claim after pancakemix said he is going to modkill him for posting his win condition? Shouldn't that have implied that he was telling the truth?Fircoal wrote:I call bull with the role too. Seriously since when did staying up protect you from dying? I mean kills happen in the day when everyone is awake. In fact one just happened in this game! That sounds like quite a double standard that you're making out that Pancake is doing.
With the number of votes needed for a lynch still hanging one above the normal, I guess the most likely scenario is that we have someone with an extra vote or something?pancakemix wrote:With 9 alive it takes 6 to lynch.
Good point. Thus bringing up why that rule existed in the first place...nagerous wrote:unvote vote edocsil
He doesn't seem to know what the town WC is.
DoomYoshi wrote:Test it on me. Tree stump is my favorite role anyway lol. Next time I am picking Wispy Woods as my character.
spiesr wrote:So, Fircoal, did you skim or something? Why where you stating your disbelief in safariguy's claim after pancakemix said he is going to modkill him for posting his win condition? Shouldn't that have implied that he was telling the truth?Fircoal wrote:I call bull with the role too. Seriously since when did staying up protect you from dying? I mean kills happen in the day when everyone is awake. In fact one just happened in this game! That sounds like quite a double standard that you're making out that Pancake is doing.
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
sheepofdumb wrote:Not what I expected Will's role to be. I'm 0 for 2 for calling roles. Not that it mattered because they weren't lynches. I think I'll stop trying to metagame with the flavor because I have no idea what any setup is.
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
Fircoal wrote:sheepofdumb wrote:Not what I expected Will's role to be. I'm 0 for 2 for calling roles. Not that it mattered because they weren't lynches. I think I'll stop trying to metagame with the flavor because I have no idea what any setup is.
Fixed
Also I will also Vote: Edoc for the same gamebreaking reasons.
DoomYoshi wrote:Test it on me. Tree stump is my favorite role anyway lol. Next time I am picking Wispy Woods as my character.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
spiesr wrote:Anyhow, I am going to pick my favorite case right now and try to go with it. I find edocsil to be the scummiest right now. They I see it, the first he he does is use nagerous vote on shield to attack him under the guise of defending the new player. For a while he goes on with this, making posts defending shield and explaining things to him to maintain credibility for his vote on nagerous. However, shield does not improve and the tide shifts, people pres edocsil for his stance against nag and defense of shield. He responds with this.Once more people start to turn against shield edocsil sets up this post as a way for him to transition to the popular side. Shortly afterwords he joins the tide of votes on shield with this post, justifying his actions and reconcile them with his prior arguments by citing timing as why it is right to do so now, be was wrong to do so earlier.edocsil wrote:Certainly not. one more slip up on his part and I'm going to do a 180.Commander9 wrote:Now, this last part was something different. Saf, I wasn't suggesting no lynch - I'd rather wanted to pressure Nag (and still do), but if shield continues on this path, he will not last long.Later when called on his actions.edocsil wrote:Me too, Unvote Vote Shield (still FoSing Nag for jumping on him waaay too soon)He states that making such an obvious association with a scummate is not a good move. That is correct, but shield was not his scum buddy. Scum may defend townies to try and look like the part of a do-gooder town player, to use it as leverage to attack those going after the person they are defending, to try and incriminate the person they associated with should they be exposed as scum at a later point, or any number of other reasons. So I don't think this defense here really amounts to anything. It just says that edocsil wasn't partnered with shield. (Which we now know to be the case anyway.)edocsil wrote:Believe me, if he was my scummate I would have never defended him. I wouldn't ever make a mistake like that. Look at the lynch of safari in Nostalgia. Defending scum vigorously = everyone thinks you are scum and hanging scum looks good if you are on the wagon early enough. I am not a fan of shooting at random D1 because the odds of shooting right are slim, but there is only so far I am willing to stick my neck out for rookie. When he continued to advocate a NL I figured enough was enough.Now after safariguy suggests having a no lynch for the day TAILGUNN3R and Streaker post stating this action has caused them to become suspicious of safariguy. Edocsil wastes no time turning this suspicion into a no contest case to lynch safaiguy on the spot. So once again he jumps onto what he sees as the popular side. While he was the first vote, in my opinion he is simply following the sentiment that he saw from the two prior posters and trying to fit into that crowd.edocsil wrote:Vote Safari my only worry is that he is a jester and we won't get any info from hanging him.safariguy5 wrote:unvote vote no lynchThen he tries to justify his move by coming up with points against safariguy.edocsil wrote:Ok so beyond the current NL argument I have been getting bad vibes from Saf, He was already marked in red on my little excel chart before he started arguing for a NL.
So anyway, I suck at making cases and there isn't a ton of stuff to go off of today but edocsil gets my vote. Vote edocsil.
sheepofdumb wrote:edocsil wrote:Ok so beyond the current NL argument I have been getting bad vibes from Saf, He was already marked in red on my little excel chart before he started arguing for a NL. Here is one of his postssafariguy5 wrote:Commander9 wrote:safariguy5 wrote:Well bottom line is that we now know that we have a SKer of some sort. I'd guess third party, but that's not set in stone. It's still a useful death.
Joker could easily be mafia, to be honest. Also, the only way I could see this as a useful death is that we'll lose a troll, but a cop generally is a big loss.
True, but remember this was a daykill. Give mafia a daykill+ a nightkill would be really powerful in a 11 person game. And him not being town-aligned makes me wonder what incentive he had to clear any players or accuse them.
In all honesty I agree with him, that being said He is trying to draw attention away from the mafia and onto a SK.
If we are going to assume that Joker is a third party SK then you can't draw attention away from a mafia that hasn't done anything. Both factions (if they are separate) are dangerous to the town. The sooner both of die the sooner the town is safe.spiesr wrote:He states that making such an obvious association with a scummate is not a good move. That is correct, but shield was not his scum buddy. Scum may defend townies to try and look like the part of a do-gooder town player, to use it as leverage to attack those going after the person they are defending, to try and incriminate the person they associated with should they be exposed as scum at a later point, or any number of other reasons. So I don't think this defense here really amounts to anything. It just says that edocsil wasn't partnered with shield. (Which we now know to be the case anyway.)edocsil wrote:Believe me, if he was my scummate I would have never defended him. I wouldn't ever make a mistake like that. Look at the lynch of safari in Nostalgia. Defending scum vigorously = everyone thinks you are scum and hanging scum looks good if you are on the wagon early enough. I am not a fan of shooting at random D1 because the odds of shooting right are slim, but there is only so far I am willing to stick my neck out for rookie. When he continued to advocate a NL I figured enough was enough.
Edoc saying that because he knew shield wasn't his scummate he could defend him made me suspicious. I was even more suspicious when Edoc washed his hands of shield and then proclaimed his innocence with this post:
(Shield dies)edocsil wrote:Yeah, that is likely the best thing that could have happened, I would have been in a tight spot otherwise.
Edoc has shown signs of bandwagoning. He waits until it is safe and jumps on people who take riskier moves.edocsil wrote:Me too, Unvote Vote Shield (still FoSing Nag for jumping on him waaay too soon)edocsil wrote:Vote Safari my only worry is that he is a jester and we won't get any info from hanging him.safariguy5 wrote:unvote vote no lynch
He already had a red flag in my book so I'm going to bump it up to a unvote vote edoc.
DoomYoshi wrote:Test it on me. Tree stump is my favorite role anyway lol. Next time I am picking Wispy Woods as my character.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users