Epitaph1 wrote:
and now he's saying that he was not happy with the crasp lynch from the start and that he just moved it because he had to get a vote out? I don't buy it. Also, I mentioned before that Zivel accepted crasp's watered down half-claim very easily. His most recent post admits that was an error, it could also have been a slip.
My other thought is to start looking at other people on the crasp bw.
Looking back I should never of voted crasp. I don't like voting without a reason and I don't like voters that don't have a reason, my reason was sound but I didn't really feel it. I live in NZ and I voted at night before bed, I was surprised when I woke to see him not dead, I thought that would be the last post of crasps. The speed of this game is surprising.
Iron Butterfly wrote:
You did not answer my earlier question. Do you recall the game not to far back where you were pegged as mafia for using the same vocabulary?? The game where you tried so hard to come across Town by using "us Town" and "We"? A simple yes or no will suffice.
Yes course I remember that, it was the noobiest mistake I have made in mafia to date. I didn't see it in bunnies:
27ninjabunnies wrote:Haha, I'm not even remotely a newbie, but thanks.
I do not think everyone in my city is town, and I pointed out in one of my posts the exact same thing. So no, not trusting them, and definitely not a newbie mistake.
My point was, that mafia already have more information than town. They know who town are and who mafia are, while us town players know only ourselves, like whether we are VT or a role, or so on. Coming out and talking about cities I believe gives mafia more information to use against the town. That is why I was wary of talking about cities. Not because I think that all the people in a city is town (though I wouldn't put it past Storr totally mindfucking everyone like that), but because I didn't want to give mafia more information than they already have. They could not have known about the locations. That was my point.
But anyway, I like the activity and questioning so far of people in this game. I am highly impressed.
Question: Someone fosed betiko. Why?
I mean hers was no where near as bad as mine, mine was repetitive posts and a lot more obvious than that.
Second there was no wagon. I voted by what I thought appeared scummy. One could argue She was being a wise ass or sarcastic in her replay. I saw it as her trying to play word games by flipping it back to me. What I find odd is that you made no mention of my scumminess until after you withdrew your vote from crasp. It was only then that my vote became issue.
The wagon thing was a mistake, I thought you voted second. I had it in my head that you were following a Jak vote, I will say it again that the vote thread is a pain in the arse. I had you picked as my top scum read after betiko, but it was not a strong read and so I thought I would follow the wagon on crasp before pushing it. When crasp claimed and I thought him dead, I changed my vote to head into day two hoping to apply pressure to you. Unfortunately my investigative skills were flawed and we are in this situation. I still don't think your case on bunnies is any good but I also am not 100% sold on her being town anymore either.