
Moderator: Community Team
karelpietertje wrote:man i was having a huge hangover when day 1 ended and slept through it :O i couldve saved Macket!
these birds.. do they mean some of the bandits knew who gandalf was?
if so, we should be trying to lynch the guys who voted on Macket right?
pmchugh wrote:karelpietertje wrote:man i was having a huge hangover when day 1 ended and slept through it :O i couldve saved Macket!
these birds.. do they mean some of the bandits knew who gandalf was?
if so, we should be trying to lynch the guys who voted on Macket right?
You shouldn't talk about the game till day comes around.
Simon Viavant wrote:If you still need a replacement I could play.
Mr. Squirrel wrote:Who would have wanted nag dead? I'm gonna have to read back through the thread when i get the chance.
nagerous wrote:karelpietertje wrote:sam_levi_11 wrote:I havent forgotten, but i cant post at weekends often as im busy then. Even so, i find this bangwagon on clive rather baseless. As he said, it based on that he is cosistant. Pmc then said this was a scum tell, which it isnt. He seems determined to get clive lynched. fos pmcMr. Squirrel wrote:Also, has anyone else noticed that sam levi still has hardly posted, even after he admitted to 'forgetting' about the game?
fos on him indeed!
let's not forget that he was the one who started with immediately voting on somebody... I still can't see why a townie would do that.
vote karelpieterje
Just my assessment of things so far.. what he is doing here is a classic newbie scum strategy.
FOSing the person who is under pressure from the vote - clive in this case, but not actually going as far to put a vote on him in order to keep under the radar so to speak. He also, attempts to provide evidence against clive too in order to subtely build a case against him. I will not be voting clive as this particular bandwagon stinks of a scummy set up.
pmchugh wrote:Anyway I think a review of yesterday is needed and I will be the first to admit that the lynch of mm wasn't the best but it was kind of all I had and if I hadn't went after him I would have probably been lynched.
sam_levi_11 wrote:nagerous wrote:karelpietertje wrote:sam_levi_11 wrote:I havent forgotten, but i cant post at weekends often as im busy then. Even so, i find this bangwagon on clive rather baseless. As he said, it based on that he is cosistant. Pmc then said this was a scum tell, which it isnt. He seems determined to get clive lynched. fos pmcMr. Squirrel wrote:Also, has anyone else noticed that sam levi still has hardly posted, even after he admitted to 'forgetting' about the game?
fos on him indeed!
let's not forget that he was the one who started with immediately voting on somebody... I still can't see why a townie would do that.
vote karelpieterje
Just my assessment of things so far.. what he is doing here is a classic newbie scum strategy.
FOSing the person who is under pressure from the vote - clive in this case, but not actually going as far to put a vote on him in order to keep under the radar so to speak. He also, attempts to provide evidence against clive too in order to subtely build a case against him. I will not be voting clive as this particular bandwagon stinks of a scummy set up.
Yesterday Nag was quite hard and harsh on Karel, calling him newbie scum. This was because we was obviously avoiding the topic. A claim to which he still hasnt answered, seeming to hope this new day will mean we forget. Along with this, if he was newbie scum, being this his first/second game, certainly first as scum, he is likely to kill whoever was getting close to finding him out. It often happens with newbie scum and i think Karel simply panicked and killed him to protect himself. This, coupled with the fact he obviously avoided the topic despite neither forgetting about it or being busy and how he has been on every bandwagon in the shape of a vote or fos means im going to vote karel
Suspect101 wrote:vote mr.squirrel
He has been urging on each bandwagon while remaining in the shadows. I have a bad feeling about mr.squirrel and would like to see some pressure on him.
Suspect101 wrote:vote mr.squirrel
He has been urging on each bandwagon while remaining in the shadows. I have a bad feeling about mr.squirrel and would like to see some pressure on him.
spiesr wrote:After a quick look back at yesterday, I feel a possible situation being that pmc was scum and led the charge against MM and that Mr. Squirrel was his scum mate and came to save him by joining the MM bandwagon. I will vote Mr. Squirrel for now to further explore such possibilities...
Thezzaruz wrote:pmchugh wrote:Anyway I think a review of yesterday is needed and I will be the first to admit that the lynch of mm wasn't the best but it was kind of all I had and if I hadn't went after him I would have probably been lynched.
Forcing a bad lynch to save yourself is kind of scummy tbh. But seeing as it's still early days of D2 and a few other leads needs to be considered I'm not voting just yet.
spiesr wrote:After a quick look back at yesterday, I feel a possible situation being that pmc was scum and led the charge against MM and that Mr. Squirrel was his scum mate and came to save him by joining the MM bandwagon. I will vote Mr. Squirrel for now to further explore such possibilities...
pmchugh wrote:Suspect101 wrote:vote mr.squirrel
He has been urging on each bandwagon while remaining in the shadows. I have a bad feeling about mr.squirrel and would like to see some pressure on him.
unvote vote suspect If there is anyone I do not think is scum in this game it is mr. squirrel. He has played 100% townie IMO and you gave incredibly weak reasons, how about quoting and giving some actual thought behind it. What happened to your big posts? This is out of character for you and I can easily see you being scum.spiesr wrote:After a quick look back at yesterday, I feel a possible situation being that pmc was scum and led the charge against MM and that Mr. Squirrel was his scum mate and came to save him by joining the MM bandwagon. I will vote Mr. Squirrel for now to further explore such possibilities...
Looking for bandwagons much?Thezzaruz wrote:pmchugh wrote:Anyway I think a review of yesterday is needed and I will be the first to admit that the lynch of mm wasn't the best but it was kind of all I had and if I hadn't went after him I would have probably been lynched.
Forcing a bad lynch to save yourself is kind of scummy tbh. But seeing as it's still early days of D2 and a few other leads needs to be considered I'm not voting just yet.
I knew I was town but wasn't sure about MM, what would you do in my place?
Suspect101 wrote:you have been the scummiest player in this game and your round robin vote hopping is not helping either. I wonder why a scumy person thinks another player has "played 100% town". Also, spiesr never voted mr.squrril, way to jump the gun on that one. Interesting how you like to swing the light of suspicion towards people who have accused you or your defenders. And I guess we can just throw that whole hubbub about you thinking I am town out the window. Also my "big posts" really got me far haven't they? ever consider that people may change their stratagey to try and find a more efficent means to the ends?
And I guess we can just throw that whole hubbub about you thinking I am town out the window
suspect101 wrote:you like to swing the light of suspicion towards people who have accused you or your defenders
pmchugh wrote:Suspect101 wrote:you have been the scummiest player in this game and your round robin vote hopping is not helping either. I wonder why a scumy person thinks another player has "played 100% town". Also, spiesr never voted mr.squrril, way to jump the gun on that one. Interesting how you like to swing the light of suspicion towards people who have accused you or your defenders. And I guess we can just throw that whole hubbub about you thinking I am town out the window. Also my "big posts" really got me far haven't they? ever consider that people may change their stratagey to try and find a more efficent means to the ends?
I disagree big posts and round robin vote hopping is IMO the most efficient technique for finding scum. It's a lot easier not to slip up if you sit in the background, but even as scum it's less intresting. Why are you protecting speisr? And I didn't say he did bandwagon I said he was looking for a bandwagon, he picked out a newbie who was just accused and me who is probably the easiest player to BW atm.
And I guess we can just throw that whole hubbub about you thinking I am town out the window
suspect101 wrote:you like to swing the light of suspicion towards people who have accused you or your defenders
pmchugh wrote:Suspect101 wrote:you have been the scummiest player in this game and your round robin vote hopping is not helping either. I wonder why a scumy person thinks another player has "played 100% town". Also, spiesr never voted mr.squrril, way to jump the gun on that one. Interesting how you like to swing the light of suspicion towards people who have accused you or your defenders. And I guess we can just throw that whole hubbub about you thinking I am town out the window. Also my "big posts" really got me far haven't they? ever consider that people may change their stratagey to try and find a more efficent means to the ends?
I disagree big posts and round robin vote hopping is IMO the most efficient technique for finding scum. It's a lot easier not to slip up if you sit in the background, but even as scum it's less intresting. Why are you protecting speisr? And I didn't say he did bandwagon I said he was looking for a bandwagon, he picked out a newbie who was just accused and me who is probably the easiest player to BW atm.And I guess we can just throw that whole hubbub about you thinking I am town out the window
I changed my mind entirely, my whole instict says you are scum.
I notice you are not voting me yet, but I garuntee you will for the very reason you just accused me:suspect101 wrote:you like to swing the light of suspicion towards people who have accused you or your defenders
You didn't seem to think I was scummy before I accused you, or at least you seemed to think Mr. Squirrel was more suspicious. So go on BS me and tell me your fake reason for vote changing.
Suspect101 wrote:You are the first person to jump on people and call them scum for vote hopping, but when you do it there is a reason? You are changing your norms, so you must be scum (by your deduction of me doing the same thing).
I am posting less content not less in general, your theory is deadwood and should be burned as such.
No, I am not going to vote for you because I want to hear more about Mr.Squrril. So go BS yourself. Should be fun and will probably amuse you for hours.
Oh, by the way, your instincts stink.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users