Skyrim Mafia Endgame: Hail Sithis! (3/18) Skyrim Wins!

[pancakemix]

There has been MORE than enough rage in this thread. Stop.

Leehar, shut up. You're dead. And a wall post about the game is still a breach of the rules.

Jak, shut up. You are also dead. Edoc might be abrasive, but you are as well by your own admission (and hell, so am I). I put the kibosh on our argument when I thought things might get too personal, I ask that you do the same here.

Edoc, quit while you're ahead. We've seen how these things can get in this thread already. It's not worth it.

Something of substance to come.

[edocsil]

There has been MORE than enough rage in this thread. Stop.

Leehar, shut up. You're dead. And a wall post about the game is still a breach of the rules.

Jak, shut up. You are also dead. Edoc might be abrasive, but you are as well by your own admission (and hell, so am I). I put the kibosh on our argument when I thought things might get too personal, I ask that you do the same here.

Edoc, quit while you're ahead. We've seen how these things can get in this thread already. It's not worth it.

Something of substance to come.

Fair enough, I'll shut up. Like I said it was supposed to all have been in PM, and not game chat anyhow. After I saw the post I knew it was going to make a mess. I would have just edited it if it hadn't already been posted about.

[everywhere116]

Alright. I think it goes without saying that what jak and Leehar did was wrong, and most importantly, everybody to not breath a word about it from here on out.

Please continue.

[XenHu]

Wow, come back and 3 dead. Sorry been absent a few days, but work is kickin my a$$
Try to check in at least once a day from here out

Red def means not town so thats cool.
Im pretty clueless on flavor of this game.
Anyone have any insights on theives guild guy or the RED dude who got killed?

No, red does not mean anything, as far as I am concerned. In a game which looks like it contains three sides, why would you assume red is bad?

well the dragonborn died. that sucks.

Nice of you to show up.


I want to add that I also think judging Jak's lynchers as possible mafia doesn't seem like it will be a very good place to start. It's too easy to manipulate the lynch result in either direction(i.e You lynched Jak so you must be scum!/You didn't lynch Jak, why weren't you around? You must be scum!).

That said, there is a lot of attendence issues that is making this game really difficult to play, for those of us activly involved, IMO.

-X

[pancakemix]

Not fully anticipated distractions withheld my post last night, but here it is now.

First and foremost, anyone who hasn't spoken up yet needs to soon. You know who you are and the dead are louder than you.

Secondly, I find kage most suspicious at the moment. Mainly, his earlier vote on edoc.

edocsil (2) - Leehar, kager
I don't see how the 2nd vote on a person in a game that takes 10 to lynch is a BW, but then again this is my first mafia game

Allow me to rephrase, because I did something similar during the jak case: my implication was that you saw a case readily available and jumped straight toward it.

I would point out that kage was notably absent during jak's lynch, but since it was under 24 hours I don't really have the right. He was noncommittal, however, opting only to FOS jak rather than actually vote him.

[jonty125]

I find newguy scummy.

Well I prefer poking with a very sharp blade to get their attention

He posted this 5 days before deadline, not helping at all.

This is hinting Im not a VT, as when Im a VT I speak alot more as I dont have much to lose.

Please tell me how this helps town?

I dont post much on day one because everytime I do I am called out on it for some reason unseen to me till they point it out.

So, you don't post much because your afraid of being called out? Surely that would encourage inactive hunters to call you out?

vote newguy

[nagerous]

I find newguy scummy.

Well I prefer poking with a very sharp blade to get their attention

He posted this 5 days before deadline, not helping at all.

This is hinting Im not a VT, as when Im a VT I speak alot more as I dont have much to lose.

Please tell me how this helps town?

I dont post much on day one because everytime I do I am called out on it for some reason unseen to me till they point it out.

So, you don't post much because your afraid of being called out? Surely that would encourage inactive hunters to call you out?

vote newguy

New guy's post was dumb but I have marked it down mainly to inexperience instead of my scuminess in my book. I am always quite suspicious of the first person to present a case on day 2, even if it was something that had been previously discussed in day 1. I just wonder whether it is a scum move to try and ramp up the pressure on someone who may be considered more the easy lynch than others.

[new guy1]

Your right, I havent added much to the game. I also said I didnt mean to slip up and say I wasnt VT. I am having a bittersweet moment with nag as he has it marked as just normal play, but yet hes basically calling me a noob . I have played a fair amount of games nag, I just had a slip-up like everyone else can say theyve had. Not saying its a scummy slip up, just saying it was a slip-up. Either way, Ive defended what I could, so I cant really clear it up anymore.

[XenHu]

I find newguy scummy.

Well I prefer poking with a very sharp blade to get their attention

He posted this 5 days before deadline, not helping at all.

This is hinting Im not a VT, as when Im a VT I speak alot more as I dont have much to lose.

Please tell me how this helps town?

I dont post much on day one because everytime I do I am called out on it for some reason unseen to me till they point it out.

So, you don't post much because your afraid of being called out? Surely that would encourage inactive hunters to call you out?

vote newguy

You can stop beating the horse now, it's dead.

No, really, put down the club.

Jonty, all you've done is regurgitate what was said a million times over. Top it off with a vote? Really?

Just to be clear(and for the final time): What newguy did was bag o' bricks dumb. I don't support it, and neither should anyone else. I'm in no mood to rush off and lynch someone, however. We saw what happened with Jak.

-X

[XenHu]

Your right, I havent added much to the game.

EBYOP: Step it up, then! :p


-X

[LSU Tiger Josh]

Right we shouldn't rush off to do get a lynch, but at same time we need to figure out what is going on with this day since we had 2 deaths occur. Unless someone steps up and wants to claim one of them as a town vigilante, we need to start looking somewhere to try to find scum.

Also as a heads up, I'll probably be only posting every other day as I'm working out of town now and may not have wifi available each day, but I dropped down to just this game so hopefully will be able to keep up here.

[ghostly447]

Right we shouldn't rush off to do get a lynch, but at same time we need to figure out what is going on with this day since we had 2 deaths occur. Unless someone steps up and wants to claim one of them as a town vigilante, we need to start looking somewhere to try to find scum.

Also as a heads up, I'll probably be only posting every other day as I'm working out of town now and may not have wifi available each day, but I dropped down to just this game so hopefully will be able to keep up here.

Why in the hell would we make our Vig claim? That is a powerful role, one that is not something we want exposed. The fact that you would ever suggest that our Vig claim is unexcused. unvote if needed, Vote LSU Tiger Josh. There is no reason for a vig to step up and claim, please dont. So lets start looking here to try to find scum.

[jonty125]

Right we shouldn't rush off to do get a lynch, but at same time we need to figure out what is going on with this day since we had 2 deaths occur. Unless someone steps up and wants to claim one of them as a town vigilante, we need to start looking somewhere to try to find scum.

Also as a heads up, I'll probably be only posting every other day as I'm working out of town now and may not have wifi available each day, but I dropped down to just this game so hopefully will be able to keep up here.

I'll be interested to see his logic, as asking vig to claim is pretty scummy unvote vote LSU Tiger Josh.

[nagerous]

If one of those kills was done by a vig, take it fucking easy. There's no need to kill every night, especially on night 1 where there is little evidence to truely go on.

[everywhere116]

Vote Count 1

LSU Tiger Josh: 2 (ghostly, jonty)
Not Voting: 13 (nagerous, shield, new guy, clever, edocsil, pancake, LSU, XenHu, /, soundman, crazy, cowboys, kager)


With 15 alive it takes 8 to lynch.

[edocsil]

If one of those kills was done by a vig, take it fucking easy. There's no need to kill every night, especially on night 1 where there is little evidence to truely go on.

I as a vig kill almost every single night. Perhaps not N1, but certainly N2. If I don't have suspects by then, I am not doing my homework. I am just frustrated we have no flavor around the kills. It's really leaving us drifting.

[LSU Tiger Josh]

Unless someone steps up and wants to claim one of them as a town vigilante, we need to start looking somewhere to try to find scum.

Some people evidently have reading comprehension problems. I said "UNLESS" which does not mean I expect or want the vig to claim. If we're getting 2 deaths a night and a lynch during the day that will come out to having this game over probably by day 5 I would imagine. To accuse me of saying vig "needs" to claim or I "want" to claim is just plain ignorant and stupid. Learn to think and come up with reasons of your own instead of a mindless bandwagon Jonty.

[ghostly447]

Unless someone steps up and wants to claim one of them as a town vigilante, we need to start looking somewhere to try to find scum.

Some people evidently have reading comprehension problems. I said "UNLESS" which does not mean I expect or want the vig to claim. If we're getting 2 deaths a night and a lynch during the day that will come out to having this game over probably by day 5 I would imagine. To accuse me of saying vig "needs" to claim or I "want" to claim is just plain ignorant and stupid. Learn to think and come up with reasons of your own instead of a mindless bandwagon Jonty.

Good enough. I was hoping for a slip and you to glide over your own words too easily. unvote. That got us nowhere...

[XenHu]

Right we shouldn't rush off to do get a lynch, but at same time we need to figure out what is going on with this day since we had 2 deaths occur. Unless someone steps up and wants to claim one of them as a town vigilante, we need to start looking somewhere to try to find scum.

Also as a heads up, I'll probably be only posting every other day as I'm working out of town now and may not have wifi available each day, but I dropped down to just this game so hopefully will be able to keep up here.

I'll be interested to see his logic, as asking vig to claim is pretty scummy unvote vote LSU Tiger Josh.

Do you jump from person to person because you actually have some cohesive evidence against them?

Or are you just trying to be cute?

Unless someone steps up and wants to claim one of them as a town vigilante, we need to start looking somewhere to try to find scum.

Some people evidently have reading comprehension problems. I said "UNLESS" which does not mean I expect or want the vig to claim. If we're getting 2 deaths a night and a lynch during the day that will come out to having this game over probably by day 5 I would imagine. To accuse me of saying vig "needs" to claim or I "want" to claim is just plain ignorant and stupid. Learn to think and come up with reasons of your own instead of a mindless bandwagon Jonty.

Good enough. I was hoping for a slip and you to glide over your own words too easily. unvote. That got us nowhere...

Ghostly, I'm not sure where or how you though LSU was going to 'slip', as it seems you mis-read his post completely, but I'm willing to let it pass for the time being.

Vote: Jonty

For failing to bring anything new to the table(or anything to the table at all, unless you like re-hashed arguments) and for handing out votes like candy.

You've completely failed to address the questions that were directed towards you. This might serve as a little incentive.

-X

[/]

After reading back, I think I'll vote crazy.
He seems to be able to criticize others and insist they play the game

ok yall, can we actually try to play? and not just talk off comment?

both of yall shut up.

please... play the game.

Yet I have trouble finding anything that could be considered relevant from crazy himself.

he disappeared from this thread between the 5th to 11th, when he was prodded. His posts since then are borderline irrelevant.

Responding to the prod. I dont really like lynching inactives... Just doesnt go well with me... but then again, it has led to lynching the GF D1...

fence sitting

I also vote we wait on LSU, but not to long.

irrelevant to scum hunting

mk, I agree mostly with jak, but he does seem like our best choice for a lynch atm. but im not voting him.
fastposted

irresponsible neutrality

mk, I agree mostly with jak, but he does seem like our best choice for a lynch atm. but im not voting him.
fastposted

You see, I have a problem with this. You say hes the best choice for a lynch but you dont vote him? Why are you refraining if you believe him to be the best candidate? And I am NOT egging you on, Im just wondering why you are so undecisive if you believe him to be the scummiest person. I do not have a candidate and that is why I refrain from casting an uneducated vote. You however believe him the best candidate and list no reason why you are not going to vote him? Explain please.

fastposted- also just thought, I do not want to derail the case on Jak if it is that far along, but I just find a problem in this.

I'm just willing to let things pan out, thats all, if it will appease you i will vote for him.

He doesn't care at all where his vote goes, instead passing the responsibility onto whomever.

well thats a lynch.

well the dragonborn died. that sucks.

and most recently posting to post the obvious

Heck, I don't think he voted a single time this whole game! Not even a joke vote...

[crazymilkshake5]

mk, I agree mostly with jak, but he does seem like our best choice for a lynch atm. but im not voting him.
fastposted

You see, I have a problem with this. You say hes the best choice for a lynch but you dont vote him? Why are you refraining if you believe him to be the best candidate? And I am NOT egging you on, Im just wondering why you are so undecisive if you believe him to be the scummiest person. I do not have a candidate and that is why I refrain from casting an uneducated vote. You however believe him the best candidate and list no reason why you are not going to vote him? Explain please.

fastposted- also just thought, I do not want to derail the case on Jak if it is that far along, but I just find a problem in this.

I'm just willing to let things pan out, thats all, if it will appease you i will vote for him.

He doesn't care at all where his vote goes, instead passing the responsibility onto whomever.

First off. Learn sarcasm.


secondly, I was going to drop the hammer on jak, but he had already died. And dont tell me he wasnt fucking dead.

[jonty125]

Do you jump from person to person because you actually have some cohesive evidence against them?

Well I statred with newguy to try and get the ball rolling for today and then I slightly misread LSU's post and 'cos someone else had voted for the reason I felt, I thought my reasoning was correct.

You've completely failed to address the questions that were directed towards you.

What questions?

[nagerous]

A couple of good cases have been presented, and I would say at this stage milkshake and jonty look like good potential targets for the lynch in the absence of better leads.

Out of the case / presented I find this post the most suspicious:

mk, I agree mostly with jak, but he does seem like our best choice for a lynch atm. but im not voting him.

It seems like he is refusing to vote for him but not out of any real principle, more that he doesn't want to be associated with the bandwagon. His excuse for this was he 'was waiting for things to pan out' which in other words is that he wanted to stay out of it as much as possible and in essence submarine, which is a pretty big scumtell in my books.


Elsewhere jonty has been very vote hungry, day 2, firstly with new guy and then LSU. This could possibly be born out of frustration through the lack of moment and inactivity in the game or it could be because he is lynch hungry mafia but his behaviour is certainly scummy.

At the very least both of them ought to do some good defending or they could find themselves on the way to the chopping block.

[crazymilkshake5]

A couple of good cases have been presented, and I would say at this stage milkshake and jonty look like good potential targets for the lynch in the absence of better leads.

Out of the case / presented I find this post the most suspicious:

mk, I agree mostly with jak, but he does seem like our best choice for a lynch atm. but im not voting him.

It seems like he is refusing to vote for him but not out of any real principle, more that he doesn't want to be associated with the bandwagon. His excuse for this was he 'was waiting for things to pan out' which in other words is that he wanted to stay out of it as much as possible and in essence submarine, which is a pretty big scumtell in my books.


Elsewhere jonty has been very vote hungry, day 2, firstly with new guy and then LSU. This could possibly be born out of frustration through the lack of moment and inactivity in the game or it could be because he is lynch hungry mafia but his behaviour is certainly scummy.

At the very least both of them ought to do some good defending or they could find themselves on the way to the chopping block.

ok, yes, I was waiting for things to pan out and I was going to vote. but my life happened, so i couldn't really follow this. (as in the mafia) and for that i apologize. But I can prove my role, but can Jonty?

[pancakemix]

Light-moderate pressure and you're offering to prove your role?

Something stinks about this.

Unvote (if needed) Vote Crazy