TA1LGUNN3R wrote:pmchugh wrote:After nags "3 reasons comment" I posted a response which included this:
pmchugh wrote:pmchugh wrote: It actually makes me considerably suspicious of nag, I would expect him to have much more sense. FOS nag
Nags own response to this was to in his own words do a "u-turn" on his opinion of me.
Again, what exactly did you accuse him of? Your post was a knee-jerk response to nag's demand of the 3 points. I'm suspicious of every single person playing the game (always), yet I haven't actually accused them of anything. Merely stating that you find somebody suspicious isn't an accusation.
Your highlighted passages, I'm afraid, don't justify your point. Nag asked a simple question, and you and others took it the wrong way and got super defensive, which caused him to suspect you. I don't see how that is unreasonable discourse. You ask questions; based on responses you have suspicions.
Wrong wrong WRONG! Stop caring so goddam much about semantics. Lemme break it down.
1. Nag does not suspect me.
2. Nag asks me a question.
3. I find that question scummy and place an FOS on him.
4. IB accuses nag of being scum because he asked that question.
5. Nag admits to a u-turn of opinion, saying that me and my henchmen (IB) have tried to turn the vote round on him. Me and IB earn FOS's.
Oh My God yoU Suck.
I'd like to see some quotes on this please. The only thing vaguely like this that I remember saying was along the lines of everyone else was voting/accusing but not really giving him statements he could reply to and/or deny.
I said I was going against popular opinion.. that doesn't mean I was the only one. I never claimed to be anything special, I just said I disagreed with the majority.
If I'm so scummy in your eyes because of my lack of activity and my self-serving posts, then I don't know why you haven't voted for me. I can only surmise that, recognizing that you're in a tight spot, you don't want to be accused of omgus'ing.
This is not OMGUS and nor would it be if I voted for you, as you can see if you go back a few pages and review my list of targets where you clearly fell into the category of "Leaning mafia". I haven't voted you just yet as I am still weighing up my options, no townie is ever 100% sure and there are plenty of other candidates for lynching today.
[image removed]
I have little regard for a list of scum potentials that might include me, especially one that is cursory and without much merit. You're entire point against me consisted of my activity, which wasn't isolated to this one game, but across the board.
I pointed out the list purely to show that my suspicions on you were cemented in this thread and that I would not worry about being accused of OMGUS. You suggested this is why I was not voting for you and I was dismissing that claim.
However the reasons I suspect you go beyond lack of activity. They also go on quality of posts; all your posts seemed to be attempts to go under the radar, until the moment you are accused at which point you panic and start posting. This can be seen by the vast increase in the quality of your posts in the last few pages.
FASTPOSTED several times. I find this exchange intriguing but don't buy the whole "one of us is mafia" attitude. @ CP what if ghostly is town? This could end in two townie lynches which would be catastrophic.
