You nervous about something jak? How'd you go from:
jak111 wrote:But at this point, any more guilty reports from a cop would be highly recommended to out them now. I can easily kill them in the night if town is not willing to lynch them. Though if no guilties I'll just have to go with my gut again. (Told you IB was a hard bugger to read when he's against you btw)....
....Until a PR brings up some info for us, I'm going with my gut here. My gut has been right(ish) in the night. Not as much in the day, but I don't have a big list left of whom I think is scummy at the current moment.
and
jak111 wrote:I know MP is not a vampire and we will all know by tomorrow if pcm is one. I put garlic on both of you, it takes a day for its effect to work. MP is still around so he is no vampire.
and
jak111 wrote:Shush MP. I already marked you off as townie.
to
jak111 wrote:I am not buying this whole
MudPuppy wrote:Unvote Jmac: he's still the person I want to vote for atm... but I'm a little nervous with it being L-1. I don't want the day to end prematurely.
How did you go from that to finding Sausage as scum all in the same real life day?
MP I THOUGHT YOU WERE TOWN BEFORE THIS CLAIM, now it's just way too fishy.
That big swing in your read on me because I delayed my revelation?!?!? If you truly were a pro-town vampire hunter, I would've expected you to say... "That's awesome, MP... Let's go kill some vamps." But instead, we get:
jak111 wrote:Let's say we kill sausage and then he turns up to be who he says. Then we have to get rid of both MP AND Spiesr.
But if we kill MP and he is who he says, we'd only have to kill Sausage.
I'm still new to Mafia but surely it is not uncommon for cops to hold their cards close to their chest in hopes of getting some more info on the table first. Would it have been better for me to disclose my investigation BEFORE Whatsausage made his claim? Of course not. With the info I had, I ultimately planned to vote Sausage today... my "he's still the person I want to vote for atm" comment is true... I'm not going to vote for sausage before I was ready to release the results of my investigation. So, "AT THAT MOMENT" jmac, my second highest scum read at the time, was who I wanted my vote on. And the reason for the "I don't want the day to end prematurely" quote should be pretty obvious at this point since it's clear I had something to say and didn't want to risk losing that opportunity. I was just waiting for the right time to make my claim and midday of D3, with 4 real life days left to discuss my claim seemed right.
Oh, and let me correct your logic about who to lynch today:
jak111 wrote:Let's say we kill sausage and then he turns up to be who he says. Then we have to get rid of are able to out both MP AND Spiesr as scum.
But if we kill MP and he is who he says, we'd only have to kill out Sausage as scum.
I certainly hope the town believes me and lynches Sausage... but the info is now out there and you will learn the truth of it either way you go.
Your response to my claim makes you look scummy... and, by association, makes your reads questionable. Now that all the cards are out on the table I'd love you to better explain your 90% jmac read:
jak111 wrote:Surprised no one else has commented on my vote on Jmac (and Jmac yet to make an appearance to complain that I am voting him). Does that mean no one cares about that vote or no one cares about him? Right now if no one has any info I am thinking a Jmac push would be in order. I believe 90% he is scum at the current moment.
At the time, you made the comment, it sure sounded like you had some real dirt on him... and I believed you and went with it since it was a direct extension of my IB scum read. But your subsequent revelations have done little to support your scum read of jmac.
Oh, and I might add I find it more than a bit ironic that you give me grief for waiting 'til half way through D3 to make my claim when you dragged out your revelations over a couple of days.
FOS on jak