Storr wrote:your the one trying to push me for a lynch, so its your job. So, no i will not aid you in pressing for my lynch. As for the difference in time spent playing this game, I'll damn well spend it how i want to, So i suggest you be do a better job with your focus on the game, getting out key points you want discussed. Reinforcing real reasons as to why you think i'm scum, rather than attacking 1 liners, and waiting for me to "dig stuff up for you"
So indignant are we! Well, you can't tell me how to live my life outside this forum, so deal. I'm asking you to pull up your responses. If you choose not to I have to consider them unaddressed. Eventually, I will have a moment to go back. Right now I don't. As it stands, you still stand accused of cherrypicking crasp's comments and some other weaksauce stuff. Apparently strike is dissatisfied enough about your response to still consider voting you, so that's what I think of your response to him.
Storr wrote:Its not false, its relative.
By your own admission, it is false. It wasn't prominent at the time, but you noted it. To say otherwise is so lie.
Storr]So while you keep taking like this and not backing up statements, then i will continue calling you scummy, for making blanket statements and not actually showcasing what you mean. [/quote]
This is deliciously ironic: what am I not backing up?
[quote="Storr wrote:I Made my case, several people have made cases against hotshot, till you comment on those cases directly, this comment means absolutely nothing
You mean like this?
pcm wrote:Hey Storr, anamaniacks actually got my vaguely interested in the HotShot case. I guess making a point about personal inconsistencies is better than just saying "LYNCH PLOX", mirite?
I will grant you, that got mixed up in a weird quote thing, but it stands that I made a comment about it.
Storr wrote:This "nitpicking" statement if anything indicates that you are really not following the situation with hotshot, nor are you caring about my arguments because 1. your extremely biased and nothing i do/say will change your mind unless its a "forced change" that you have to accept regardless of your alignment, or you are scum so you purposely are doing this to keep casting doubt on me, to keep pushing me down.
It may be true to some extent, but only because I think you've been scummy. Let's be honest: if I think you're scum, I'm going to be suspect of the cases you bring up. I don't really consider this nitpicking, because you're not continuing or generating anything new with these comments. You're just telling us to lynch HotShot.
Storr wrote:I did ask for more clarity.
K now I'm gonna get nitpicky. You didn't ask for clarity in that quote. You just said it was vague. That's a very passive/aggressive way to ask for clarification.
Storr wrote:I've had a history with delaying reads.
I've played with you enough to not believe this. And really, you haven't delayed the read but the reason for it anyway.
Storr wrote:Not to mention, i've all ready given reason WHY i'm not addressing strike wolf right now, I have business lynching hotshot right now.
But you took enough time to say that your read had changed and you wouldn't explain why. So that's bull.
Storr wrote:This is an over reaction from you on something that shouldn't be causing this much "outrage" and "damnation"
Please call every time I swear an overreaction.
Storr wrote:Instead, we have blanket statement form you stating that "EVERYTHING" i'm doing regarding hotshot is bad
Pretty sure I didn't say that. I said I wasn't sold and that your method was unconvincing (and out of character).
Storr wrote:1 just happens to be because i'm town
Lol
Storr wrote:2. I'm playing very transparent, i'm explaining everything thats going on in my mind, is it always at the time people want it? sometimes no.
Those two don't really mix. You having a reason for flipping on Strike is unclear at best.
Storr wrote:3. I've basically soft claimed something, and you have made no comment on that.
1. That's not a reason to move away
2. My comment is "just fucking claim" because it would be more effective than demanding votes.
Storr wrote:As for hotshot, you admit there are good points against him, yet you haven't actually said who made good points. and what points those are. Instead, we have blanket statement form you stating that EVERYTHING i'm doing regarding hotshot is bad. Its very easy, from these statements to think you have an incredibly huge bias against me, since you are not actually explaining yourself.
I did do the first thing, didn't do the second, and see that you're playing differently fro your norm in the 3rd. I'm not sure what I'm not explaining, which again, is deliciously ironic.
aage wrote:He's been asking for comments all day, and he's been asking for votes after that. I don't think I've read the phrase "Lynch HotShot" in his posts more than twice.
Well, that's a good bit of nitpicking. I don't really think the case was at rest, so I felt that premature and the move itself a little out of character.
aage wrote:On Day 1, you didn't have any town read that you would defend. On Day 2, Yay, everyone is town! Except Storr. It's the change of heart that sets me off.
This is a very good point and I like it.
Storr wrote:@zivel i have some comments for you within 24 hours. possibly let me know when you have free time and are online on the forum, so we can converse at that time thanks in advance.
Wat.
Storr wrote:I'm glad to see you have 0 input on hotshot
I do believe an unvote is plenty input enough.