synchronized wall spamming/multiple members [warned/disc] lv

[jefjef]

I would like to state that I was not involved in the "lack attack" also I would like to state that I was drunk, this wont be happening again. I offer my apologies to all involved.

Once I had some time to reflect I decided against that course of action and withdrew my post. I think I made the right choice, only time I did that night lol.

Mmmm. I'm sorry owen. You seem to have a valid complaint. lacks wall was heavily banged by the same gang.

[lord voldemort]

being drunk is no excuse at all...
quite frankly im tired of people trying to use it on a weekend. Oh i was drunk you cant hold me responsible. If you cant hold your alcohol...dont drink...if you cant control yourself when you drink to not be.....well annoying....then just dont turn on your computer. In fact if you are getting drunk why the flip are you on a computer?

[Caymanmew]

Once I had some time to reflect I decided against that course of action and withdrew my post. I think I made the right choice, only time I did that night lol.

considering you lead this i think that is a bit of a....lie?(cant think of the word sorry)

[BoganGod]

Intentionally annoying..... Proven.


The Bogan Divinity has spoken.

[Caymanmew]

Intentionally annoying..... Proven.


The Bogan Divinity has spoken.

is it?

i for one never went into this intending to annoy anyone. although it did it was not my intention.

[owenshooter]

Mmmm. I'm sorry owen. You seem to have a valid complaint. lacks wall was heavily banged by the same gang.

the black jesus is infallible... the black jesus also forgives those with a heavy heart... no need to worry my child, the black jesus still
loves you... thank you for your kind words, my son, they shall not soon be forgotten... the black jesus has spoken...-the black jesus

[jpcloet]

i for one never went into this intending to annoy anyone. although it did it was not my intention.

Not sure if this is abuse, but certainly appears to be immaturity at its finest. Ii wish some of these kids would refrain from posting.

[trapyoung]

So should I direct link this to my age limit demand or are we going to sticky this post here like a boar's head on a stake?

[lord voldemort]

this is pending btw....dont want to get itchy trigger finger out.

[Caymanmew]

ok here what i think in terms f what should be punished. i think we should get a clear for what owen reported. it was not spam as 1 person never posted more then once. although what was dont to lack it spam and should be punished.(with a warning or ban or whatever)

[jefjef]

ok here what i think in terms f what should be punished. i think we should get a clear for what owen reported. it was not spam as 1 person never posted more then once. although what was dont to lack it spam and should be punished.(with a warning or ban or whatever)

Are you negotiating your punishment? LMAO!!!

Heck lets just put up a poll and vote on it.

A: Web site ban all.

B: Warn them and make them scrub walls.

C: All the above.

[pmchugh]

These gusy might back down but I'm not. It was a bit of fun, stop taking life so seriously.

[Caymanmew]

ok here what i think in terms f what should be punished. i think we should get a clear for what owen reported. it was not spam as 1 person never posted more then once. although what was dont to lack it spam and should be punished.(with a warning or ban or whatever)

Are you negotiating your punishment? LMAO!!!

Heck lets just put up a poll and vote on it.

A: Web site ban all.

B: Warn them and make them scrub walls.

C: All the above.

no i not negotiating it i saying what should be punished and what should not be punished. (but i'm happy to be let free here)

[gcwca_4_life]

being drunk is no excuse at all...
quite frankly im tired of people trying to use it on a weekend. Oh i was drunk you cant hold me responsible. If you cant hold your alcohol...dont drink...if you cant control yourself when you drink to not be.....well annoying....then just dont turn on your computer. In fact if you are getting drunk why the flip are you on a computer?

lovo, just don't forget, no one is awesome as me when I'm drunk.

Mmmm. I'm sorry owen. You seem to have a valid complaint. lacks wall was heavily banged by the same gang.

the black jesus is infallible... the black jesus also forgives those with a heavy heart... no need to worry my child, the black jesus still
loves you... thank you for your kind words, my son, they shall not soon be forgotten... the black jesus has spoken...-the black jesus

Ooooh black jesus, I need your help. I'm a sinner, and I'm goin to hell.

ok here what i think in terms f what should be punished. i think we should get a clear for what owen reported. it was not spam as 1 person never posted more then once. although what was dont to lack it spam and should be punished.(with a warning or ban or whatever)

Are you negotiating your punishment? LMAO!!!

Heck lets just put up a poll and vote on it.

A: Web site ban all.

B: Warn them and make them scrub walls.

C: All the above.

All votes for C get a free batch of cookies from jefjef!

ok here what i think in terms f what should be punished. i think we should get a clear for what owen reported. it was not spam as 1 person never posted more then once. although what was dont to lack it spam and should be punished.(with a warning or ban or whatever)

Are you negotiating your punishment? LMAO!!!

Heck lets just put up a poll and vote on it.

A: Web site ban all.

B: Warn them and make them scrub walls.

C: All the above.

no i not negotiating it i saying what should be punished and what should not be punished. (but i'm happy to be let free here)

AAAAAHHHH!!! RUN FOR YOUR LIFE!!!!


Your not free yet. This is still pending.

[lord voldemort]

was there anyone else you did this to?

[the.killing.44]

memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=3#wall

lol

[Caymanmew]

was there anyone else you did this to?

i did it to maybe 6? players the other 4 where doing it to other before me so i cant say how many in total

[owenshooter]

ok here what i think in terms f what should be punished. i think we should get a clear for what owen reported. it was not spam as 1 person never posted more then once. although what was dont to lack it spam and should be punished.(with a warning or ban or whatever)

it most certainly is spam. and to make it even worse it was a coordinated spam attack. just because each of you only left one message does not mean it was not spam. you all left similar messages in an effort to fill my wall with one distinct theme/message. it is spam. you should be punished for what you did. and now your admission of doing it to 6 others and not knowing how many the others have done it to proves my points. you are synchronizing the spamming of walls. if i were to contact 100 members and have each of them send you an individual message that stated "robots don't eat candy", would that be spam? each member only sent you one message, so by your standard it can't be spam. you filled my wall just as i would fill your inbox with a single distinct and synchronized message. you all posted at the exact moment!! how was this not synchronized and/or not spam? i truly find it amusing that you feel that you should not be punished for what you did to my wall, but only to others walls... get a grip.. the black jesus is saddened by your actions...-the black jesus

[Caymanmew]

ok here what i think in terms f what should be punished. i think we should get a clear for what owen reported. it was not spam as 1 person never posted more then once. although what was dont to lack it spam and should be punished.(with a warning or ban or whatever)

it most certainly is spam. and to make it even worse it was a coordinated spam attack. just because each of you only left one message does not mean it was not spam. you all left similar messages in an effort to fill my wall with one distinct theme/message. it is spam. you should be punished for what you did. and now your admission of doing it to 6 others and not knowing how many the others have done it to proves my points. you are synchronizing the spamming of walls. if i were to contact 100 members and have each of them send you an individual message that stated "robots don't eat candy", would that be spam? each member only sent you one message, so by your standard it can't be spam. you filled my wall just as i would fill your inbox with a single distinct and synchronized message. you all posted at the exact moment!! how was this not synchronized and/or not spam? i truly find it amusing that you feel that you should not be punished for what you did to my wall, but only to others walls... get a grip.. the black jesus is saddened by your actions...-the black jesus

i woulds not report the 100 people, i'd be pissed off but would suck it up.

it was synchronized yes it was not spam.

i am not saying dont punish me for what i did to owen punish me for what i did to whoever

[owenshooter]

it was synchronized yes it was not spam.

this is the krux of the complaint... this is spam... period... it is synchronized spam... 20 similar posts by one person on your wall is the same as 20 people posting 1 similar post on your wall... actually, the latter is far worse, because it requires a certain maliciousness in order to coordinate, plan and execute the attack on the intended targets wall... what you did is worse than spam... the black jesus shall smite you...-the black jesus

[Caymanmew]

it was synchronized yes it was not spam.

this is the krux of the complaint... this is spam... period... it is synchronized spam... 20 similar posts by one person on your wall is the same as 20 people posting 1 similar post on your wall... actually, the latter is far worse, because it requires a certain maliciousness in order to coordinate, plan and execute the attack on the intended targets wall... what you did is worse than spam... the black jesus shall smite you...-the black jesus

i see your points i just dont agree on it

[pmchugh]

Is it spam? Yes it is.

But lets get a few things straight, owen is complaining not because this annoyed him (just read his OP) but instead because he is seeking attention, well here ya go pal have a healthy dose.

These "attacks" barely qualify as anything, although admittedly we went to far with lack. I will remove them comments upon request.

Now a few more things:

I would like to state that I was not involved in the "lack attack" also I would like to state that I was drunk, this wont be happening again. I offer my apologies to all involved.

Once I had some time to reflect I decided against that course of action and withdrew my post. I think I made the right choice, only time I did that night lol.

You were involved and the only reason you never continued to post was because you weren't able to keep with it. Don't lie, man up and except the no doubt minor yet unjustified punishment.

Intentionally annoying..... Proven.


The Bogan Divinity has spoken.

On the contrary annoyance was not the intended goal. Attentional annoyance is all over the forums and much higher levels usually including personal attacks and clear disrespect. I would like to think that there is some consistancy from the mods and in this case "Intentionally annoyance" is not applicable.

Not sure if this is abuse, but certainly appears to be immaturity at its finest. Ii wish some of these kids would refrain from posting.

I am not a kid. I have contributed a significant amount of time to CC in order to help in many ways but your right I should refrain from posting at all costs cause I am simply not mature enough.

In sumamry yes it was spam, I admit that. But I would also like to see a consistancy in the moderators and as I have no previous warnings, I can't see any justification in punsihment.

[trapyoung]

A warning is technically punishment so I wouldn't get too concerned at being "punished" per se. I've gotten a 2-3 warnings but they've just not been made publicized. I don't think any of you all have gotten in trouble before and this certainly isn't something as egregious being a multi or blatant in-game abuses. Were you guys annoying and acting stupid? Of course, some of you recognize that. But do you guys deserve to be banned from the site? Nope. So you all should just calm down, you deserve warnings, maybe even a 1 day forum and live chat ban just to see it's possible but you guys are pleading like you'll be guested and stuff. That would be absolutely ridiculous and a severe overreaction by a mod, which I don't think will happen. You messed up and you'll be punished, but that punishment will constitute a warning and you'll accept it [hopefully] gracefully.

[Caymanmew]

A warning is technically punishment so I wouldn't get too concerned at being "punished" per se. I've gotten a 2-3 warnings but they've just not been made publicized. I don't think any of you all have gotten in trouble before and this certainly isn't something as egregious being a multi or blatant in-game abuses. Were you guys annoying and acting stupid? Of course, some of you recognize that. But do you guys deserve to be banned from the site? Nope. So you all should just calm down, you deserve warnings, maybe even a 1 day forum and live chat ban just to see it's possible but you guys are pleading like you'll be guested and stuff. That would be absolutely ridiculous and a severe overreaction by a mod, which I don't think will happen. You messed up and you'll be punished, but that punishment will constitute a warning and you'll accept it [hopefully] gracefully.

you dont think i'm gotten in trouble?....ok

[trapyoung]

how much trouble could you have gotten in? someone catch you stealing cookies?