Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team
TeeGee wrote:I can see that some members do not know how to follow the few simple rules we have in place on this site, like only posting evidence in this particular forum.
The admins KNOW what has happened, they made the ruling and also made changes to the system. Their was no gross abuse of the system as it was, if their was then the admins would have come down hard on those accused.
jgordon1111 wrote:lol at least you have a valid point there,if its that easy to pin them down how come sometimes it takes so long to get them? And the mob I am speaking of is not that big of a mob. Its a small number of players using this misfortune on CC to try for revenge.
John Deere wrote:Victor Sullivan wrote:*sigh* But these are dark times, when a stand-up guy like Masli has to quit due to cheating and getting caught from forum-goers that seem to not have much respect for the mods that can do what they want if they dont get caught cheating in to many games andthat spend hours serving them...
-Sully
Fixed that for you!
eye84free wrote:I see this issue here but as you see it wasnt done as many times nor out of malice. If you look during that time I always join a few singles games 1vs 1. I would always play when im bored, not out of hunting for multis. my 1 vs 1 ratio far exceeds must by 100 to 1. So im my defense. Also I reported any issues I have had to the higher ups pertaining to this. Prior to any Masli ruling.
Thanks
mc05025 wrote:How on earth they can be Innocent????? I can not even find theory that is not absolutely ridiculous...
jgordon1111 wrote:Very odd how so many complain about what is going on,and are not going to be happy with the outcome no matter what. But yet are in every forum that comes up on the subject to complain about how the site is ran, If I was this upset about a gaming site,most likely I would have went elsewhere by now. A simple hypothesis you dont like authority and never will,here you can lash out without any actual consequences,unlike the real world where you most likely would drop your head and walk off mumbling to yourselves. It's a new year in a couple of days all that pent up rage and self loathing take it and go to your boss(or whoever teacher,professor)like you have some and just let go. You might feel better if you do.
Dukasaur wrote:mc05025 wrote:How on earth they can be Innocent????? I can not even find theory that is not absolutely ridiculous...
I honestly have no idea whether he's guilty or not. But as far as theories of how he could be innocent, yes I can see a few. We don't know all the factors that an MH takes into account when making a bust, and we're not supposed to know. But let's try this for a theory:
Multi has Account A and Account B. Both use the same computer, but at this point they might just be roomates who only have one computer. In order to prove they're a multi, you need both to log in at the same time, because while roomates might use the same computer at different times, they're not likely to be on it at the same time.
So, Account A is currently taking a turn, and Account B has open games waiting. As a diligent Multi-hunter, you join the open game with Account B as a trap. Sure enough, Account A finishes his turn, and logs in to Account B to take his turn, with no delay. Now you have him! Snap! You've closed the trap.
The trouble is, in order to trap him, you have to join that game with Account B. If he doesn't see that someone has joined his game there, he won't bother logging in to it. Having him log in several hours later won't help; that will allow the "roomate" defense. You need him to log in immediately after his turn on Account A or the evidence isn't conclusive.
So, yeah. I can certainly see this scenario, with several possible variations, taking place a lot, and of course it means the MH ends up in numerous games with busts.
Dukasaur wrote:mc05025 wrote:How on earth they can be Innocent????? I can not even find theory that is not absolutely ridiculous...
I honestly have no idea whether he's guilty or not. But as far as theories of how he could be innocent, yes I can see a few. We don't know all the factors that an MH takes into account when making a bust, and we're not supposed to know. But let's try this for a theory:
Multi has Account A and Account B. Both use the same computer, but at this point they might just be roomates who only have one computer. In order to prove they're a multi, you need both to log in at the same time, because while roomates might use the same computer at different times, they're not likely to be on it at the same time.
So, Account A is currently taking a turn, and Account B has open games waiting. As a diligent Multi-hunter, you join the open game with Account B as a trap. Sure enough, Account A finishes his turn, and logs in to Account B to take his turn, with no delay. Now you have him! Snap! You've closed the trap.
The trouble is, in order to trap him, you have to join that game with Account B. If he doesn't see that someone has joined his game there, he won't bother logging in to it. Having him log in several hours later won't help; that will allow the "roomate" defense. You need him to log in immediately after his turn on Account A or the evidence isn't conclusive.
So, yeah. I can certainly see this scenario, with several possible variations, taking place a lot, and of course it means the MH ends up in numerous games with busts.
John Deere wrote:jgordon1111 wrote:lol at least you have a valid point there,if its that easy to pin them down how come sometimes it takes so long to get them? And the mob I am speaking of is not that big of a mob. Its a small number of players using this misfortune on CC to try for revenge.
Holy shit! welcome to CC, maybe you should read things you coment on!Hell thats what most of us have been saying for a while, as you play your your your your your your broken ass record, I finally foed you so i didnt have to read your stupid crap ass opinion that is the same same same same same broken ass comment over over over and over again. Glad you finally got reading comprehension skills AT THE AGE OF 47
Chariot of Fire wrote:This is why you're in Entertainment, thankfully.
king sam wrote:quit facebook stalking me... and Im a sailor all I do is drunk, cuss and make illegitimate kids when Im away from CC
dont sig that
AgentSmith88 wrote:I would like to think I'm completely objective as I have no feelings one way or the other about masli or eye and really no feelings towards admin either. Having looked at the evidence I would say that if I were on a jury I would find them guilty (beyond a REASONABLE doubt).
Again, I have nothing against either of these people but to have people kicked out so quickly and have it done so many times repeatedly doesn't seem like coincidence nor a clever way to bait multis.
Honestly, the new policy put in place basically says "Yep, they did it, but we are closing that loophole so nobody can do it again." I think that's where most of the hostility is coming from - the "mob" isn't looking for punishment for offenders but is pissed about the 'not guilty' verdict that looks suspicious.
eye84free wrote:I have no need to defend myself anymore. I will say this. to those of you who state you like or dislike me, it doesnt bother me. Those of you who have an oppion about this, thats great please post. I said my peice and if you dont believe me, thats fine too. It doesnt hurt my feelings one bit. But those of you who have done far worse things on this site that have been posting, you have no right to cast stones at glass houses, those of you who have joined a game and a min later finish a post to a hunter asking if someone is a multi, you have no right to put your sense in. Trust me I can count atleast 3 that have posted to have done so to me alone. But this is not cheating in your eyes. But because I have a few games out of 12000 that people want to nitpick all of a sudden im a bad guy or cheating. Those who truly know me and know what im about, know im a fair player, and because people are out to try and tarnish the hunting team cause you have nothing better to do with your time, well shame on you. I respect peoples oppion when they are honest,fair, and otherwise untarnished, everyone who doesnt fit in this cat. needs to sit back and mind your own, free or prim it doesnt mater. Please only speak about the topic at hand , not the rest of the hunters or admin. Save those for posts about them, this topic is about eye84free and poss. abuse that was cleared. I do think all people have a point and I respect that. I do also think the point has been made about this topic and im sure it will be locked soon, just like anyother topic out there that has gone on and on, doesnt mater if its about a hunter or not.
Again I thank you for all your input good or bad.
Dukasaur wrote:Chariot of Fire wrote:This is why you're in Entertainment, thankfully.
Generally, an ad hominem attack means you don't have any possible way to attack the actual argument that he presented.
Lindax wrote:Dukasaur wrote:Chariot of Fire wrote:This is why you're in Entertainment, thankfully.
Generally, an ad hominem attack means you don't have any possible way to attack the actual argument that he presented.
Your knowledge of Latin is really impressive. Now look up the word "argument" in the English dictionary. The post he was responding to was yours. You never made an argument, you presented a theory.
Eget quod scitis
Lx
Dukasaur wrote:Lindax wrote:Dukasaur wrote:Chariot of Fire wrote:This is why you're in Entertainment, thankfully.
Generally, an ad hominem attack means you don't have any possible way to attack the actual argument that he presented.
Your knowledge of Latin is really impressive. Now look up the word "argument" in the English dictionary. The post he was responding to was yours. You never made an argument, you presented a theory.
Eget quod scitis
Lx
When the meaning of what is being communicated is perfectly clear, does it really contribute anything to castigate someone over a semantic issue?
I've typed and erased several smartass responses. Quite honestly, I don't have any desire to get into a big pissing match with you over my erudition or lack thereof. I'm not a stupid man, but I'm perfectly aware that I don't know everything.
Do you have anything to say that is directly relevant to my theory?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users