Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team
lord voldemort wrote:well actually any alliance entered to before the game starts is gross abuse of the game...
trapyoung wrote:no one said suicide or sabatoge, all mojo said was show proof of defeating 'x' - could be 1v1, could be team game, could be anything. the post by spaceghst44 on callouts was the first post to bring up an issue of suiciding, stalking, throwing games, and issuing unwarranted negative feedbacks.
also, an alliance is defined as an agreement or cooperative action to achieve a certain goal among two or more individuals. seems to me that for an alliance to actually exist there needs to be two or more people in the game in question working towards this goal. if mojo or any other drs member for that sake was in these games helping take out spaceghst44 or anyone else for that matter, that would be gross abuse and in violation of rule 2, however, that hasn't been the case or there's no indication that would ever be the case.
and all we do is target players? when qyu started accusing us of cheating did we join a bunch of standard games and team up on him? no, we kicked his ass in a variety of triples and quadruples games. we don't join standard matches and throw games and set friends up, we participate in team games with one another and prefer to clobber the shit out of you there.
maybe what mojo did was unsportsmanlike but what spaceghst44 did was just as much a broach of accepted conquer club etiquette. he deadbeat a game, verbally attacked numerous drs members, left retaliatory feedback, falsely implicated numerous members of drs with no basis, and issued a call out setting up a system for throwing games (it's locked in the call out forum but a good read - "bounty on all drs members").
i am really looking forward to a mod ruling to shut most of you up.
hulmey wrote:trapyoung wrote:no one said suicide or sabatoge, all mojo said was show proof of defeating 'x' - could be 1v1, could be team game, could be anything. the post by spaceghst44 on callouts was the first post to bring up an issue of suiciding, stalking, throwing games, and issuing unwarranted negative feedbacks.
also, an alliance is defined as an agreement or cooperative action to achieve a certain goal among two or more individuals. seems to me that for an alliance to actually exist there needs to be two or more people in the game in question working towards this goal. if mojo or any other drs member for that sake was in these games helping take out spaceghst44 or anyone else for that matter, that would be gross abuse and in violation of rule 2, however, that hasn't been the case or there's no indication that would ever be the case.
and all we do is target players? when qyu started accusing us of cheating did we join a bunch of standard games and team up on him? no, we kicked his ass in a variety of triples and quadruples games. we don't join standard matches and throw games and set friends up, we participate in team games with one another and prefer to clobber the shit out of you there.
maybe what mojo did was unsportsmanlike but what spaceghst44 did was just as much a broach of accepted conquer club etiquette. he deadbeat a game, verbally attacked numerous drs members, left retaliatory feedback, falsely implicated numerous members of drs with no basis, and issued a call out setting up a system for throwing games (it's locked in the call out forum but a good read - "bounty on all drs members").
i am really looking forward to a mod ruling to shut most of you up.
trapyoung wrote:no one said suicide or sabatoge, all mojo said was show proof of defeating 'x' - could be 1v1, could be team game, could be anything. the post by spaceghst44 on callouts was the first post to bring up an issue of suiciding, stalking, throwing games, and issuing unwarranted negative feedbacks.
also, an alliance is defined as an agreement or cooperative action to achieve a certain goal among two or more individuals. seems to me that for an alliance to actually exist there needs to be two or more people in the game in question working towards this goal. if mojo or any other drs member for that sake was in these games helping take out spaceghst44 or anyone else for that matter, that would be gross abuse and in violation of rule 2, however, that hasn't been the case or there's no indication that would ever be the case.
and all we do is target players? when qyu started accusing us of cheating did we join a bunch of standard games and team up on him? no, we kicked his ass in a variety of triples and quadruples games. we don't join standard matches and throw games and set friends up, we participate in team games with one another and prefer to clobber the shit out of you there.
maybe what mojo did was unsportsmanlike but what spaceghst44 did was just as much a broach of accepted conquer club etiquette. he deadbeat a game, verbally attacked numerous drs members, left retaliatory feedback, falsely implicated numerous members of drs with no basis, and issued a call out setting up a system for throwing games (it's locked in the call out forum but a good read - "bounty on all drs members").
i am really looking forward to a mod ruling to shut most of you up.
FabledIntegral wrote:
1. However showing proof of defeating of 'x' is basically offering incentives to... what? Sabotage the game. Just because you were able to carefully choose your words doesn't mean they won't have the exact same outcome.
2. I don't care what the other player did - what we are addressing is what your clan's response is. He could have grossly abused multiple CC rules, had multi accounts, etc. I'm merely commenting that I agree with the topic starter on his points that what your clan is doing is quite unsportsmanlike.
3. Assuming the second paragraph was also directed towards me, once again, I never said you guys were breaking any rules. It just merely seems like you're complaining about his etiquette, which to me seems somewhat hypocritical.
4. I believe your clan has displayed a complete and total show of arrogance in this thread. You've basically come in preaching about how awesome your clan is, about how anyone who could possibly think otherwise fails to see the bigger picture, etc. Or at least that's what I've come to gain from this thread.
5. I'm pretty sure I've already seen a mod post, yet not in defense of your clan. Once again returning to the arrogance issue... I doubt we'll get "shut up." Whatever their ruling is concerning actual CC rules, it doesn't take away from the fact your clan has made themselves sound like pompous ........
trapyoung wrote:FabledIntegral wrote:
1. However showing proof of defeating of 'x' is basically offering incentives to... what? Sabotage the game. Just because you were able to carefully choose your words doesn't mean they won't have the exact same outcome.
2. I don't care what the other player did - what we are addressing is what your clan's response is. He could have grossly abused multiple CC rules, had multi accounts, etc. I'm merely commenting that I agree with the topic starter on his points that what your clan is doing is quite unsportsmanlike.
3. Assuming the second paragraph was also directed towards me, once again, I never said you guys were breaking any rules. It just merely seems like you're complaining about his etiquette, which to me seems somewhat hypocritical.
4. I believe your clan has displayed a complete and total show of arrogance in this thread. You've basically come in preaching about how awesome your clan is, about how anyone who could possibly think otherwise fails to see the bigger picture, etc. Or at least that's what I've come to gain from this thread.
5. I'm pretty sure I've already seen a mod post, yet not in defense of your clan. Once again returning to the arrogance issue... I doubt we'll get "shut up." Whatever their ruling is concerning actual CC rules, it doesn't take away from the fact your clan has made themselves sound like pompous ........
1. how do you sabatogue a 1v1?
2. this is ridiculous, let rampant abuse run wild?
3. wasn't directed at you, it was at lovo - but, the 2nd paragraph wasnt about etiquette at all, it was a retort to the accusation of gross abuse & secret alliances
4. yea our clan is awesome, you caught me. rainbows & unicorns dominate.
5. mod did post but he basically flamed me calling me dumb, he was pretty accurate too.
if we sound like pompous .....'s then ignore us, all of you complaining about how we act & play haven't played us. ive never played hulmey or the OP, i've played you once and you didnt seem to have an issues w/ me in game. you have a problem w/ how i act in the forum is one thing, but YOU or ANYONE ELSE still havent shown where myself or any other drs member abused the rules or game in any game. before you jump to the defense of some kid maybe you should examine the facts & look big picture. and maybe before you condemn a group you judge every individual independently. it is ridiculous to assign the qualities of the whole to the individual or vice versa and it's something most of you have yet to realize
trapyoung wrote:we were all friends from college & home, we don't have qualities, abilities, personalities that we each like, just drinking habits.
xxtig12683xx wrote:I got through three pages of this non-sense, and then the posts got too long.
Just gonna wait for the results, kinda interested.
-tig
lord voldemort wrote:any news on thins
lord voldemort wrote:any news on thins
trapyoung wrote:decision was made, he posted it in our forum apparently he doesnt give a f*ck about your issues with us since there's no post here
we're not allowed to join standard games and gang up on anyone which we never did so status quo is in effect. he recommended we set up a tournament and play you all but since you've all ignored us and are terrified to play team games against us i guess you guys can continue to cower behind your foe list while we can gloat on the boards without using the b word
flames are also spose to be kept in FW so either a mod should move this FW or clear drs & change the title of this thread so we can all stop posting
Users browsing this forum: No registered users