Conquer Club

Jeff Hardy [Blocked]

All previously decided cases. Please check here before opening a new case.

Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]

Re: Jeff Hardy [appealed]

Postby lancehoch on Fri Nov 21, 2008 8:27 pm

With the inbox, there are three settings if it gets full: 1) delete oldest (I believe this is the default setting); 2) manually delete (what WilliamWallace is apparently using); 3) move to Saved. People can have theirs set differently, so you cannot just assume that everyone is using the same.
Sergeant lancehoch
 
Posts: 4183
Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2007 4:13 pm

Re: Jeff Hardy [appealed]

Postby BaldAdonis on Fri Nov 21, 2008 8:28 pm

lancehoch wrote:With the inbox, there are three settings if it gets full: 1) delete oldest (I believe this is the default setting)

I don't think that is the default, cause I've never changed mine (didn't even know settings existed) and they get put on hold.
User avatar
Captain BaldAdonis
 
Posts: 2334
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 1:57 am
Location: Trapped in Pleasantville with Toby McGuire

Re: Jeff Hardy [appealed]

Postby The Neon Peon on Fri Nov 21, 2008 8:56 pm

Might I ask this: What good does the PM do?

A person broke the rules, and admitted to it SEVERAL times, including, he said, to Twill. so, if someone confesses several times to breaking the rules, but they do not have the concrete evidence to prove it... nothing happens?

Are you telling me that he is lying about having the PM sent to him, and agreeing to throw the game? You think that never received a PM and did not throw the game then, and is lying to say he broke the rules?

The Text in Italics below has already been discussed, but I still think it needs to be brought up again.

As said before. Lets take away the chat, and the confession. Now, lets pretend someone put this in secret diplomacy, that they were working together. This means all we have to go off of is the log. Seems pretty obvious from that point too.

Okay, so maybe he got some really bad dice... okay, fair enough. Now, explain to me why a person would deploy all on a territory not bordering his enemy 3 rounds in a row and attack a neutral.
User avatar
Lieutenant The Neon Peon
 
Posts: 2342
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2008 12:49 pm

Re: Jeff Hardy [appealed]

Postby maxatstuy on Fri Nov 21, 2008 9:02 pm

The Neon Peon wrote:Might I ask this: What good does the PM do?

A person broke the rules, and admitted to it SEVERAL times, including, he said, to Twill. so, if someone confesses several times to breaking the rules, but they do not have the concrete evidence to prove it... nothing happens?

Are you telling me that he is lying about having the PM sent to him, and agreeing to throw the game? You think that never received a PM and did not throw the game then, and is lying to say he broke the rules?

The Text in Italics below has already been discussed, but I still think it needs to be brought up again.

As said before. Lets take away the chat, and the confession. Now, lets pretend someone put this in secret diplomacy, that they were working together. This means all we have to go off of is the log. Seems pretty obvious from that point too.

Okay, so maybe he got some really bad dice... okay, fair enough. Now, explain to me why a person would deploy all on a territory not bordering his enemy 3 rounds in a row and attack a neutral.


I have to agree with Neon, there seems to be a huge double standard. When JCKing admitted to being JesusReigns, there was no proof of it and the IPs were completely different, the only thing connecting them was JCKings confession; why should the rules be different for multis as they are for this case? Just as much evidence exists here as it did in that case and in many others as well.
User avatar
Field Marshal maxatstuy
 
Posts: 638
Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2007 1:39 am

Re: Jeff Hardy [appealed]

Postby lancehoch on Fri Nov 21, 2008 9:10 pm

Guys, not sure if you missed it or something, but Twill has instated a block. What else are you looking for?
Sergeant lancehoch
 
Posts: 4183
Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2007 4:13 pm

Re: Jeff Hardy [appealed]

Postby maxatstuy on Fri Nov 21, 2008 9:13 pm

Twill wrote:OK, with the info that I have, I'm going to leave the block in place between willam-wallace and jeff, just in case.

A formal warning has also been issued to Jeff regarding requesting games be thrown. Again, this one case is not enough to take further action. If more games, players or information comes forward then further action may be taken depending on the severity of the case.

Just to be clear - with the initial decision from King and Lance it was consistent with the information they had at the time. Yes, more in depth investigation could have and perhaps should have been taken, but a post in a game chat is so easy to fabricate that to punish someone for it would have been irresponsible. As t the game he "threw", from looking at both games, the game could easily have been him giving up because of bad dice (look at it, his strategy is consistent throughout the game until jeff breaks his bonuses hard, probably because of bad defenses...he never reinforced them), it was not "clearly a thrown game"


Can we close this case now?

Twill


It sounded more like he was just leaving the block in place until this is resolved
User avatar
Field Marshal maxatstuy
 
Posts: 638
Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2007 1:39 am

Re: Jeff Hardy [Blocked]

Postby jbrettlip on Fri Nov 21, 2008 9:26 pm

Sounds like th eblock should be against ANY new 1 v1 games...since he admitted to swaying people to throw them.
Image
nothing wrong with a little bit of man on dog love.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class jbrettlip
 
Posts: 1182
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 12:30 pm
Location: Ft. Worth, TX

Re: Jeff Hardy [appealed]

Postby lancehoch on Fri Nov 21, 2008 9:41 pm

maxatstuy wrote:
Twill wrote:OK, with the info that I have, I'm going to leave the block in place between willam-wallace and jeff, just in case.
...
Can we close this case now?

Twill


It sounded more like he was just leaving the block in place until this is resolved

Twill was the resolution; when a decision gets appealed, it goes to him. He put in place a temporary block then decided to leave it in place.
Sergeant lancehoch
 
Posts: 4183
Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2007 4:13 pm

Re: Jeff Hardy [appealed]

Postby hulmey on Fri Nov 21, 2008 10:44 pm

lancehoch wrote:
maxatstuy wrote:
Twill wrote:OK, with the info that I have, I'm going to leave the block in place between willam-wallace and jeff, just in case.
...
Can we close this case now?

Twill


It sounded more like he was just leaving the block in place until this is resolved

Twill was the resolution; when a decision gets appealed, it goes to him. He put in place a temporary block then decided to leave it in place.

bet jeff cries to all the noobs when he is losing!!
[img]http://img801.imageshack.us/img801/9761/41922610151374166770386.jpg[/mg]
User avatar
Lieutenant hulmey
 
Posts: 3742
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 7:33 am
Location: Las Vegas

Re: Jeff Hardy [Blocked]

Postby Geger on Sat Nov 22, 2008 12:38 am

Agree, chat log can't proof anything, everybody can say what he wants. Posting the screenshot can't help too, because it can be modified before (with Photoshop for example).

I played tribalwars for more than 2 years (I know cc from highborn). What that site have, but this cc doesn't : We can forward an ingame message (PM) without the ability to modify it. I think this will be a good addition to this site, to avoid the same problems in the future.

Just my 2 cents :)
Major Geger
 
Posts: 325
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2008 11:29 am
Location: Sumatra

Re: Jeff Hardy [Blocked]

Postby Inhuman14 on Sat Nov 22, 2008 1:08 am

Geger wrote:Agree, chat log can't proof anything, everybody can say what he wants. Posting the screenshot can't help too, because it can be modified before (with Photoshop for example).

I played tribalwars for more than 2 years (I know cc from highborn). What that site have, but this cc doesn't : We can forward an ingame message (PM) without the ability to modify it. I think this will be a good addition to this site, to avoid the same problems in the future.

Just my 2 cents :)


Good idea - You want to put that in the sugs and bugs forum? If not, I'll do it.
Ideas in progress:
Average points count of enemies in profile page
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=70340&st=0&sk=t&sd=a
User avatar
Corporal Inhuman14
 
Posts: 161
Joined: Sat Jul 15, 2006 2:44 pm
Location: Online... of course

Re: Jeff Hardy [Blocked]

Postby Geger on Sat Nov 22, 2008 6:11 am

Inhuman14 wrote:
Geger wrote:Agree, chat log can't proof anything, everybody can say what he wants. Posting the screenshot can't help too, because it can be modified before (with Photoshop for example).

I played tribalwars for more than 2 years (I know cc from highborn). What that site have, but this cc doesn't : We can forward an ingame message (PM) without the ability to modify it. I think this will be a good addition to this site, to avoid the same problems in the future.

Just my 2 cents :)


Good idea - You want to put that in the sugs and bugs forum? If not, I'll do it.


You can do it. I'm too lazy to write in correct form :oops:

And thanks :)
Major Geger
 
Posts: 325
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2008 11:29 am
Location: Sumatra

Re: Jeff Hardy [Blocked]

Postby General Mojo on Sat Nov 22, 2008 12:16 pm

So it seems as though Jeff is now permanently blocked from playing with William, so at least the result of all of this is some sort of punishment.


I am more concerned with the whole process....I mean, unless I am interpreting Lance's original decision incorrectly, even William's repeated admissions of guilt would not have been enough for him to implement any type of punishment against Jeff. How a case like this has to get appealed to get to the correct result is beyond my comprehension. I really think CC needs to re-evaluate the standards that the admins are using to evaluate threads such as these.
Image
User avatar
Brigadier General Mojo
 
Posts: 293
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 3:55 pm
Location: depends...but usually oceania

Re: Jeff Hardy [Blocked]

Postby lancehoch on Sat Nov 22, 2008 4:21 pm

General Mojo wrote:I am more concerned with the whole process....I mean, unless I am interpreting Lance's original decision incorrectly, even William's repeated admissions of guilt would not have been enough for him to implement any type of punishment against Jeff.

I never made any kind of decision, I do not have the power to make a decision. I was just stating what the hunters would have probably come back to say.
Sergeant lancehoch
 
Posts: 4183
Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2007 4:13 pm

Re: Jeff Hardy [Blocked]

Postby RashidJelzin on Sat Nov 22, 2008 4:26 pm

Well, the only purpose this thread had was to show the CC community how low some people have sunk. Quite sad, actually. The site is being overrun by morons, player and admin- wise. #-o
When did I realize I was God? Well, I was praying and I suddenly realized I was talking to myself. - Peter OToole
User avatar
Lieutenant RashidJelzin
 
Posts: 233
Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2007 12:35 pm

Re: Jeff Hardy [Blocked]

Postby General Mojo on Sat Nov 22, 2008 5:57 pm

RashidJelzin wrote:Well, the only purpose this thread had was to show the CC community how low some people have sunk. Quite sad, actually. The site is being overrun by morons, player and admin- wise. #-o



Rashid - your post reminds me of a scene from one of the great movies of my generation:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tDaiLK0ii0k
Image
User avatar
Brigadier General Mojo
 
Posts: 293
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 3:55 pm
Location: depends...but usually oceania

Re: Jeff Hardy [Blocked]

Postby sth_94 on Mon Nov 24, 2008 4:44 am

i think if he cheated he should therefore be banned there is no ifs or buts about it cheaters never prosper but in this case he has
Private sth_94
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Nov 21, 2008 11:31 pm

Re: Jeff Hardy [Blocked]

Postby owenator on Fri Nov 28, 2008 3:00 pm

you people have way too much time to actually go through all the motions of calling someone a cheater, multi, etc. I am here to support Jeff and his integrity. And if you are so adamant about him being a cheater, my question is this: why do you care so much? It's just a game. Why take it so seriously? I'm so sick and tired of this bull$hit that happens in CC. And let me save some of you the time - I too have been called such but i still keep my account? I may as well call everyone a cheater every time I lose. Stop being such sore losers. Let it go. It's a dead issue and you have nothing to gain or lose.
User avatar
Lieutenant owenator
 
Posts: 572
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 9:41 am
Location: Toronto

PreviousNext

Return to Closed C&A Reports

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users