Moderator: Cartographers
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
Evil DIMwit wrote:I think if India figures so much in this map, it should not be so monolithic, and if it is all one bonus region, it should not have so many territories. On a similar note, the Russian regions would be impossible to defend (and I still think East Turkestan would make a good bonus).
jefjef wrote:North Vietnam is a large tert. I'd fracture it further. As for Japan I'd look at just including Kyushu on your map. Put Korean ownership to it.
isaiah40 wrote:In line with my current Fractured America map I present you with "Fractured China".
Territory count is now sitting at 73 and aiming for 80!!
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
isaiah40 wrote:Changes made:
- made the rivers clearer
- Added Capitals
- Added sea routes and land attack routes
- Increased Vietnam by two territories
- Took out border between Korea and Russia and moved the border of Jilin in between them
- Added more mountains as impassables
To do List:
- Put in legend area
- Work out bonus values
Edit: Fast posted by IH. What territories would you like to see revert back into Chinese Control? I'm willing to knock out 3 Indian and 3 Russian territories.
24Keyser wrote:
Doing Well I Suggest You Make Nepal Bangledesh And Bhutan One And Give Them A Bit Of India And Tibet
And Mayby Just Convert This Into Fractured Asia XD
And I Suggest Giving Russia Vladivodstok As Capital
Plus You Made A Typo On Yellow Sea Making It Yelow Sea
natty_dread wrote:Orisa should be Orissa (or Odisha.)
Like the map btw. Hope to see this in GP shop soon.
Industrial Helix wrote:No, I don't mean revert back to China, I mean condense and merge some of those Indian territories in India proper, same for Russia. India should be more like 7-10 territories. Russia maybe 6-7.
I'm not sure if Laos is playable or not, but you might as well throw it in the Vietnam bonus and call it greater Indochina.
And you might want a bridge to connect Shaxi to the rest of the territories it supposedly has political control over. I mean, if that river prevents armies from getting across... how is it that Shanxi is maintaining control over them?
The Bison King wrote:It's looking really good, though, I REALLY don't like Xinjiang being a part of the Russian bonus. I really think it deserves to be it's own bonus. It's a really unique and interesting part of the world with a long history of changing hands, but as far as I know it's never been a part of Russia. It doesn't make much sense to me and I think it would be more interesting as an independent region.
Also I think India's too big.
Industrial Helix wrote:Still trying to get ahold of Tacktix to grab his thoughts on this one... so sorry for the delay.
I'd still like to see a few territories merged on Russia and India... but that's really up to your discretion.
For Tibet... couldn't you make the Himalayas more Impassable? What about surrounding Tibet and reducing the bonus to maybe 1 or 2, giving it very limited access. I mean, these are the biggest mountains in the world and it must be very difficult to move an army through them.
Industrial Helix wrote:That might be cool for Burma I think. Also, with Tibet being more blockaded, I think this would help to recreate the border with China and India better. Yeah, they border each other... but they're very difficult to get between the two.
Industrial Helix wrote:I could go either way, putting it in as Indochina or making it a killer neutral.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users