Moderator: Cartographers
Mishalex wrote:Mishalex wrote:Oneyed, thanks for your advice... The enlarged Paris was an advice of koontz1973... So we had get the other territories of Ile de France out of the zoom...
Sorry Oneyed, we are in the main foundry now, so we won't continu to change the map cartographically speacking, otherwise, we could change this card indefinitely... We have to move forward now
nolefan5311 wrote:Can you please post the version with starting neutrals?
Mishalex wrote:nolefan5311 wrote:Can you please post the version with starting neutrals?
They are notice in the first post no?
Is it good enough?
koontz1973 wrote:The +8 for the Paris bonus will never be given as it is the winning condition. Remove it from the legend.
koontz1973 wrote:I have posted it before and now jghost7 has said it as well. Something needs to be done around the Paris and Foreign/Regional claims. I like his idea for having it reversed. Foreign claims attack/bombard Paris and each other. This is a nice way to open up the board some.
No one is really going to attack the foreign claims now as to do so, you are very close to the WC.
koontz1973 wrote:With Corsica, how about dropping both bonuses to a +1. Then you get the +2 for holding it which seems fair and you get to keep both the GP elements for it.
koontz1973 wrote:Great work by the way. Really looking forward to this now.
nolefan5311 wrote:koontz1973 wrote:The +8 for the Paris bonus will never be given as it is the winning condition. Remove it from the legend.
I disagree. To hold that bonus also requires the additional three regions outside of the neutral starters, and the WC requires one of the regional claims to be held, so it is possible that someone can hold that bonus while not necessarily holding the winning condition. I agree it's not likely that a person will hold that bonus without holding the WC, but there's no reason to remove the bonus completely.
all bonuses or only regional claimsjghost7 wrote:bonuses seem a bit high. One example, BZH seems like it should be a +3
nolefan5311 wrote:Have you thought about using the new conditional border feature in the map in any way?
Mishalex wrote:nolefan5311 wrote:Have you thought about using the new conditional border feature in the map in any way?
What's that?
Mishalex wrote:Oh, ok, I'm not sure we need that on this map... Why were you thinking at this, Nole?
koontz1973 wrote:Mishalex wrote:Oh, ok, I'm not sure we need that on this map... Why were you thinking at this, Nole?
It is a new toy to play with and he wants to see it in play badly.
nolefan5311 wrote:-Why is "Riots" in there after "Suburbs"? Seems out of place when nothing else on the map makes me think there are any sort of riots going on.
nolefan5311 wrote:For foreign claims, think about stating (on two separate lines)..
"Can bombard Paris"
"Can be attacked by Paris"
nolefan5311 wrote:-Lower the bonus for Free Bretagne to a +1 as well...this would clear up a lot of legend space if you could word it similar to the Foreign Claim box. That large bonus of +4 also should not be increased by 2 for holding one more additional region.
Mishalex wrote:nolefan5311 wrote:-Lower the bonus for Free Bretagne to a +1 as well...this would clear up a lot of legend space if you could word it similar to the Foreign Claim box. That large bonus of +4 also should not be increased by 2 for holding one more additional region.
True, that could permit to gain some space on the map...
nolefan5311 wrote: I will try to post those numbers tonight or tomorrow night.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users