jeraado wrote:I disagree also. If you shut down game chat how will sitters notify? I also think it would just encourage secret diplomacy
x2
Moderator: Community Team
jeraado wrote:I disagree also. If you shut down game chat how will sitters notify? I also think it would just encourage secret diplomacy
drunkmonkey wrote:I honestly wonder why anyone becomes a mod on this site. You're the whiniest bunch of players imaginable.
Ron Burgundy wrote:Why don't you go back to your home on Whore Island?
jeraado wrote:I disagree also. If you shut down game chat how will sitters notify? I also think it would just encourage secret diplomacy
Metsfanmax wrote:Why is it such a big deal that sitters identify themselves anyway?
drunkmonkey wrote:I honestly wonder why anyone becomes a mod on this site. You're the whiniest bunch of players imaginable.
Ron Burgundy wrote:Why don't you go back to your home on Whore Island?
natty_dread wrote:Question to op: would you enjoy playing a game of risk (the boardgame) with your friends, where each of you would have to duct-tape your mouths for the duration of the game?
I don't think you would.
natty_dread wrote:
Question to op: would you enjoy playing a game of risk (the boardgame) with your friends, where each of you would have to duct-tape your mouths for the duration of the game?
Chariot of Fire wrote:As for GreecePwns.....yeah, what? A massive debt. Get a job you slacker.
Viceroy wrote:[The Biblical creation story] was written in a time when there was no way to confirm this fact and is in fact a statement of the facts.
GreecePwns wrote:Concise description:
- Give the game creator the option to turn the chatbox on/off
Specifics/Details:
- This option would be listed when a player creates a game and, when turned off, the chat box would be only available for notes to self
How this will benefit the site and/or other comments:
- In Fog of War games, players who are against giving away positions (some are, some aren't) can make that impossible
- In all games, players who are against diplomacy altogether can make that impossible
- In tournaments, an organizer can use this function to fit a certain tournament theme
- Who doesn't like more options?
Why would anyone playing a team game on this setting not simply use other methods of communication such a pms? To the OP, since your idea appears to be that games of this type would ban communication between players, even if they are on the same team, how would you recommend enforcing the rules against team mates who pm/email/talk to each other?Metsfanmax wrote:Why would any person who wants to win a team game, want to ignore communication with his/her teammates?
spiesr wrote:Why would anyone playing a team game on this setting not simply use other methods of communication such a pms? To the OP, since your idea appears to be that games of this type would ban communication between players, even if they are on the same team, how would you recommend enforcing the rules against team mates who pm/email/talk to each other?Metsfanmax wrote:Why would any person who wants to win a team game, want to ignore communication with his/her teammates?
spiesr wrote:Why would anyone playing a team game on this setting not simply use other methods of communication such a pms? To the OP, since your idea appears to be that games of this type would ban communication between players, even if they are on the same team, how would you recommend enforcing the rules against team mates who pm/email/talk to each other?Metsfanmax wrote:Why would any person who wants to win a team game, want to ignore communication with his/her teammates?
Metsfanmax wrote:spiesr wrote:Why would anyone playing a team game on this setting not simply use other methods of communication such a pms? To the OP, since your idea appears to be that games of this type would ban communication between players, even if they are on the same team, how would you recommend enforcing the rules against team mates who pm/email/talk to each other?Metsfanmax wrote:Why would any person who wants to win a team game, want to ignore communication with his/her teammates?
I think the OP is suggesting that people will want to do team games without conversing with their teammate (?) and not having a game chat makes this easier to do.
But wouldn't those people presumably want their opponents to be held to the same restriction? And won't some people want to gain an advantage by communicating with their teammates anyway? An actual ban between players would be like Secret Diplomacy, easy to circumvent, impossible to enforce, only more so...Metsfanmax wrote:I think the OP is suggesting that people will want to do team games without conversing with their teammate (?) and not having a game chat makes this easier to do.
spiesr wrote:But wouldn't those people presumably want their opponents to be held to the same restriction? And won't some people want to gain an advantage by communicating with their teammates anyway? An actual ban between players would be like Secret Diplomacy, easy to circumvent, impossible to enforce, only more so...Metsfanmax wrote:I think the OP is suggesting that people will want to do team games without conversing with their teammate (?) and not having a game chat makes this easier to do.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users