[Medal] Consecutives Victories Medal

[chapcrap]

I still think that this is a cool medal. I also think that the criticisms of it are valid, so I'm not sure where I land. But I think you should cut qwert a little slack here. The idea is fun in concept. That it might not work out well because we have people that constantly abuse the system is not his fault.

well for all medal could be abuse, but these we will not have any medals at all. Like i say in first post,these its open for discussion, unfortunately for some people there its not discussion at all. What its worse, after they say negative about these suggestion, they come over and over again in these post to put negative pressure to everyone who maybe think that these its good idea.
After only 1 day of vote, they insist that these move to rejected? Its these normal?

Why don't you respond to the abuse aspect?

Why do you think that this will not lead to abuse?

Would it be decided based on when the games end or the game numbers themselves?

im not quite sure what you mean?

He is asking whether the consecutive victories go by the time the games finish or do they go by the game number.

[Qwert]

I still think that this is a cool medal. I also think that the criticisms of it are valid, so I'm not sure where I land. But I think you should cut qwert a little slack here. The idea is fun in concept. That it might not work out well because we have people that constantly abuse the system is not his fault.

well for all medal could be abuse, but these we will not have any medals at all. Like i say in first post,these its open for discussion, unfortunately for some people there its not discussion at all. What its worse, after they say negative about these suggestion, they come over and over again in these post to put negative pressure to everyone who maybe think that these its good idea.
After only 1 day of vote, they insist that these move to rejected? Its these normal?

Why don't you respond to the abuse aspect?

Why do you think that this will not lead to abuse?

Would it be decided based on when the games end or the game numbers themselves?

im not quite sure what you mean?

He is asking whether the consecutive victories go by the time the games finish or do they go by the game number.

every medal can be abused ,even map medal can be abused to.
I dont know answer of second, what are better to use?

[General Bax]

did you check how many cc members will receive this medal upon it's release?

[Gilligan]

Win 100 times in a row on 100 different maps?

No thanks.

[Qwert]

Win 100 times in a row on 100 different maps?

No thanks.

these whas mistake in mine description, thanks giligan, i fix description now.

[greenoaks]

After only 1 day of vote, they insist that these move to rejected? Its these normal?

that is quite normal for bad ideas.

it happens all the time when someone asks for a Resign/Forfeit button.

[Gilligan]

Win 100 times in a row on 100 different maps?

No thanks.

these whas mistake in mine description, thanks giligan, i fix description now.

Even then.

With all due respect, qwert, it's nearly impossible for someone to win 100 games in a row (that have at LEAST 3 players). That's difficult enough, and you have to beat 200 unique opponents while doing it? No one will get gold.

[betiko]

Win 100 times in a row on 100 different maps?

No thanks.

these whas mistake in mine description, thanks giligan, i fix description now.

Even then.

With all due respect, qwert, it's nearly impossible for someone to win 100 games in a row (that have at LEAST 3 players). That's difficult enough, and you have to beat 200 unique opponents while doing it? No one will get gold.

finding glg loopholes it would! or people could just create a usergroup with 101 players called "let's all get that damn gold fixing 100 games"

[Qwert]

Win 100 times in a row on 100 different maps?

No thanks.

these whas mistake in mine description, thanks giligan, i fix description now.

Even then.

With all due respect, qwert, it's nearly impossible for someone to win 100 games in a row (that have at LEAST 3 players). That's difficult enough, and you have to beat 200 unique opponents while doing it? No one will get gold.

so then? we need to create medal who are not easy to achive, but recently i find that some members want to present any new idea,to be systematicaly farming, like that these not hepend in all present medals, but only in mine suggestion are clear case abouth farming?

edit-add "not"

[greenoaks]

Win 100 times in a row on 100 different maps?

No thanks.

these whas mistake in mine description, thanks giligan, i fix description now.

Even then.

With all due respect, qwert, it's nearly impossible for someone to win 100 games in a row (that have at LEAST 3 players). That's difficult enough, and you have to beat 200 unique opponents while doing it? No one will get gold.

and that is for 3 player games. 100 8-player victories means 700 uniques for gold.

[betiko]

Win 100 times in a row on 100 different maps?

No thanks.

these whas mistake in mine description, thanks giligan, i fix description now.

Even then.

With all due respect, qwert, it's nearly impossible for someone to win 100 games in a row (that have at LEAST 3 players). That's difficult enough, and you have to beat 200 unique opponents while doing it? No one will get gold.

so then? we need to create medal who are easy to achive, but recently i find that some members want to present any new idea,to be systematicaly farming, like that these not hepend in all present medals, but only in mine suggestion are clear case abouth farming?

this is not a new idea. again it has been proposed dozens of times. what is your longest winning streak qwert? how likely do you think it is to acheive this without being tempted to farm shamelessly? I know that if I'm in a huge winning streak I would be tempted to go glg style to not start over and most medalheads would. Just tell me how this "wonderfull and genuine idea of yours" could benefit the site...

[agentcom]

The person with the most games on this site Mageplunka69 has only 26 consecutive victories after 35,000+ games. 100 is really not realistic at all.

[Metsfanmax]

The person with the most games on this site Mageplunka69 has only 26 consecutive victories after 35,000+ games. 100 is really not realistic at all.

Then let's change the goalposts.

Bronze = 10
Silver = 15
Gold = 20

[Jippd]

The person with the most games on this site Mageplunka69 has only 26 consecutive victories after 35,000+ games. 100 is really not realistic at all.

There has to be someone out there that has higher than 26 in a row for the map specialists. I know I've gotten around 20ish myself on Das 1 v 1. Some players that come to mind are ccat or kaskavel on hive?

[greenoaks]

The person with the most games on this site Mageplunka69 has only 26 consecutive victories after 35,000+ games. 100 is really not realistic at all.

There has to be someone out there that has higher than 26 in a row for the map specialists. I know I've gotten around 20ish myself on Das 1 v 1. Some players that come to mind are ccat or kaskavel on hive?

qwert is excluding 1v1. it has to be on 3+ player games, and different players

[Jippd]

Ah I see that makes it much more difficult so 26 in a row is very impressive for mage plunka. I think the goal of 10, 15, and 20 sounds more reasonable though I doubt very many people would even earn a bronze. 10 wins in a row with 3+ players is pretty damn difficult IMO

[Qwert]

Ah I see that makes it much more difficult so 26 in a row is very impressive for mage plunka. I think the goal of 10, 15, and 20 sounds more reasonable though I doubt very many people would even earn a bronze. 10 wins in a row with 3+ players is pretty damn difficult IMO

these its not final decision,its open for any suggestion who are accepted from community .

[greenoaks]

Ah I see that makes it much more difficult so 26 in a row is very impressive for mage plunka. I think the goal of 10, 15, and 20 sounds more reasonable though I doubt very many people would even earn a bronze. 10 wins in a row with 3+ players is pretty damn difficult IMO

these its not final decision,its open for any suggestion who are accepted from community .

bullshit, if you felt that way you wouldn't have foed me

[Metsfanmax]

Ah I see that makes it much more difficult so 26 in a row is very impressive for mage plunka. I think the goal of 10, 15, and 20 sounds more reasonable though I doubt very many people would even earn a bronze. 10 wins in a row with 3+ players is pretty damn difficult IMO

these its not final decision,its open for any suggestion who are accepted from community .

bullshit, if you felt that way you wouldn't have foed me

You've made your concerns well known, and you're right that gold being set to 100 medals is not going to win community support. That doesn't discount the possible value of this suggestion for more reasonable medal values; from now on, let's discuss those. I suggested my set because 20 wins is clearly very difficult, but also possible. Yes, it won't be like other medals, and yes, as with any feature on the site, abuse is possible. But 20 wins is much different from 100 wins; the risk of people being held hostage for long periods of time is not so large. As for the potential for farming, I think we just need to decide how much of an increased risk of that we're willing to accept. I think that the so-called farmers are a very small part of the community, and often get caught when they do it; to throw out something enjoyable because of a vast minority sets a bad precedent.

[Qwert]

Ah I see that makes it much more difficult so 26 in a row is very impressive for mage plunka. I think the goal of 10, 15, and 20 sounds more reasonable though I doubt very many people would even earn a bronze. 10 wins in a row with 3+ players is pretty damn difficult IMO

these its not final decision,its open for any suggestion who are accepted from community .

bullshit, if you felt that way you wouldn't have foed me

You've made your concerns well known, and you're right that gold being set to 100 medals is not going to win community support. That doesn't discount the possible value of this suggestion for more reasonable medal values; from now on, let's discuss those. I suggested my set because 20 wins is clearly very difficult, but also possible. Yes, it won't be like other medals, and yes, as with any feature on the site, abuse is possible. But 20 wins is much different from 100 wins; the risk of people being held hostage for long periods of time is not so large. As for the potential for farming, I think we just need to decide how much of an increased risk of that we're willing to accept. I think that the so-called farmers are a very small part of the community, and often get caught when they do it; to throw out something enjoyable because of a vast minority sets a bad precedent.

unfortunate with some people you can not discuss, they hold for hes statement and only demand that hes words are most valuable.