Moderator: Community Team
PLAYER57832 wrote:HOw about skipping the stars and just giving the number of missed turns and deadbeats as a percentage of the games played.
That is, if I miss 1 turn in 100 games, I will have a 99% rating. If I miss 20 turns in 100 games, I will get an 80% rating.
this probably WILL cause more problems during shut-downs,but perhaps they could plan for this and program in an "override" ability, strictly for those cases.. or just figure that even 20 misses in 1000 games won't show.
FabledIntegral wrote:No... someone could miss a single turn in a 100 round game and get 1 star attendance? Hardly. That's 4 stars, borderline 5 stars still, especially if they gave a reason for missing that single turn.
PLAYER57832 wrote:HOw about skipping the stars and just giving the number of missed turns and deadbeats as a percentage of the games played.
MrBenn wrote:Why should somebody be penalised for playing casual games and not checking every 20mins to take their turns? Some of us have lives/jobs/families etc.
Thezzaruz wrote:MrBenn wrote:Why should somebody be penalised for playing casual games and not checking every 20mins to take their turns? Some of us have lives/jobs/families etc.
But it is NOT a penalty. It's about displaying peoples behaviour just the same as all the other ratings are supposed to do atm or feedback did before.
FabledIntegral wrote:PLAYER57832 wrote:HOw about skipping the stars and just giving the number of missed turns and deadbeats as a percentage of the games played.
That is, if I miss 1 turn in 100 games, I will have a 99% rating. If I miss 20 turns in 100 games, I will get an 80% rating.
this probably WILL cause more problems during shut-downs,but perhaps they could plan for this and program in an "override" ability, strictly for those cases.. or just figure that even 20 misses in 1000 games won't show.
With some tweaking this is the best idea I've heard so far
PLAYER57832 wrote:Otherwise, rating folks for not spending their lives on the computer is just silly.
PLAYER57832 wrote:I think if you wish to play a speed game, then play a speed game. That does mean buying a premium membership.
MrBenn wrote:In principle I agree with the automation of the attendance rating, but completely disagree that it should be filtered down to the amount of time you take.
Why should somebody be penalised for playing casual games and not checking every 20mins to take their turns? Some of us have lives/jobs/families etc.
Pedro wrote:If you take your go in under 2 hours 5 stars
under 6 hours 4 stars
under 12 hours 3 stars
under 23 hours 59 minutes 2 stars
miss a go - 1 star.
Return to Archived Suggestions
Users browsing this forum: No registered users