Moderator: Clan Directors
niMic wrote:I find the narrative that the top clans are somehow the dissidents in all of those really amusing. Obviously someone has worked very hard at promoting it. Let's not forget that CCup ran just fine for three iterations, and it was the complaining and threats to abandon the tournament of (some of) the lower ranked clans that led to this whole situation. If this didn't end up the way you wanted, you only have yourself to blame.
Gypsys Kiss wrote: I will say that unseeded competition are what dreams are made of, just ask Ronnie Radford.
I find the narrative that the top clans are somehow the dissidents in all of those really amusing. Obviously someone has worked very hard at promoting it. Let's not forget that CCup ran just fine for three iterations, and it was the complaining and threats to abandon the tournament of (some of) the lower ranked clans that led to this whole situation. If this didn't end up the way you wanted, you only have yourself to blame.
niMic wrote:Gypsys Kiss wrote: I will say that unseeded competition are what dreams are made of, just ask Ronnie Radford.
Funny you should bring that up.
Hereford had played several ties versus more evenly matched opponents before Newcastle were even entered into the competition. In fact, their tie was the first one which Newcastle had to play in. How does that say anything about random versus seeding? If anything the situation is damn close to what josko's suggested format would lead to, with the lower ranked clans (Hereford) playing one or two ties alone, before potentially facing the top ranked clans (Newcastle) high on confidence from their earlier, more evenly matched ties.
niMic wrote:I find the narrative that the top clans are somehow the dissidents in all of those really amusing. Obviously someone has worked very hard at promoting it. Let's not forget that CCup ran just fine for three iterations, and it was the complaining and threats to abandon the tournament of (some of) the lower ranked clans that led to this whole situation. If this didn't end up the way you wanted, you only have yourself to blame.
crispybits wrote:niMic wrote:Gypsys Kiss wrote: I will say that unseeded competition are what dreams are made of, just ask Ronnie Radford.
Funny you should bring that up.
Hereford had played several ties versus more evenly matched opponents before Newcastle were even entered into the competition. In fact, their tie was the first one which Newcastle had to play in. How does that say anything about random versus seeding? If anything the situation is damn close to what josko's suggested format would lead to, with the lower ranked clans (Hereford) playing one or two ties alone, before potentially facing the top ranked clans (Newcastle) high on confidence from their earlier, more evenly matched ties.
That's not seeding (guaranteeing a team an easy draw), that's byes (allowing a team to enter in a later round), and there is a big difference between how the two work.
The timing was a bit off, Dakos pm was ready to go but it didn't go until 10 mins after, we have already apologized to him, it took some coordinating having admins and us online at the same time. It just so happened Dako came online at the same time or it would not have been an issue. Also Ok the wording was wrong we stated to Dako and and qwert that being a member of CDF was mandatory or we simply couldn't make the events democratic.
Also although it bears no real difference here. Dako agreed to work with us in the beginning and did to an extent, then after Foxgloves post he removes Cds from the equation without any consultation with us or communication. Not that that s an excuse for him getting a pm, he was getting one, but his actions were just as bad.
As for qwert, we had so much input with him, but we left him some control. Or what would be the point of him running it. As for Dako making changes, it was far from clear if these would be the changes the clan world wanted or the ones he thought were best. Surely you can see that.
Re: CCup 4 format discussion (ver 5, p. 28)
Sent: Fri Mar 22, 2013 11:23 pm
by eddie2
nicky i am a bit pissed now but being a member of cdf was not a requirement being eligible for cdf was though.... which is totally different...
i only had what i seen in public to go by and frankly yes take control of it and pm him first to let him know it before posting publicly that was out of order.... and that is probably why i will not take any part of any of these 2 events again....
like i do respect the clan mod department but i cannot respect someone who removes a person from running something without telling them first...
also remember the issue i had with qwert opening the thread before votes were finished someone in the mod department said he had full control and could not stop him from sign ups when ever he wanted... at the end of it dako had not opened sign ups but delayed the sign up stage to finalize everything so it could of changed..
Re: CCup 4 format discussion (ver 5, p. 28)
Sent: Fri Mar 22, 2013 10:17 pm
by Nicky15
Subject: CCup 4 format discussion (ver 5, p. 28)
Eddie you really do not have your facts straight. I am going to reply to you in privately, as we do not wish to post publicly against Dako out of respect.
1st of all when Dako took on CC4 we told him we wanted to oversee. The CL and Cup are our two main events and admin was keen we made them Official as clans devote nearly a year to these comps. Making them Official lets us give prizes and gives us the power to grant additional runners up medals. You are well aware of the issues in the clan league. Organizers sometimes make bad choices when they are left to make unregulated decisions, you yourself have been a victim of a bad TO. We have made a promise to the clan world that our two main comps will be overseen. And we will no longer allow bad organisers who only think they are right, and think they have the power to abuse people, change rules and make decisions that only they agree with. These comps are too important and effect too many people. We need TOs that will work with us. And having the CDs involved means if anything happens to the TO we are ready to step in straight away and take over without causing our events disruption.
qwerts CL has been fully overseen by us. The CDs helped him with most aspects. We were in constant communication with him during the set up. Please read the format of the CL and you will see that being a member of CDF is a requirement, and that the league is overseen the the CD team.
Although you might not agree clans deserve a say on the two main comps they play, we do. The CD team is trying its level best to make the Clan world a democracy. Giving clans a voice to vote on issues rather than any one person or the CD team making all the decisions. Wherever possible we want Clans themselves to decide. We won't apologize for this.
When we agreed that Dako could take CC4 we said we would need some involvement. All we asked for was that being a member of CDF was a requirement and that the hard fought for timing out rule was left. That was a huge issue before, and clans fought hard for it. The only other thing we asked him was that if he wanted to make any changes that he let clans decide on what they wanted. We don't think any one person has the right to go into a format and pick and choose the rules they like, throwing out things the don't agree with without consulting clans first. It was not his tournament, he did little toward the last Cup apart from baby sit the closing stages. We made no other demands we said as long as he represented the clan worlds best interests that he was free to decide everything else. He didn't need to get permission to post anything from us, i have no idea where you get your information.
At first Dako was cooperating with us. We were never heavy handed with him, we were pleasant and tried to compromise. But after Foxgloves post he totally bypassed us, took out the things we asked for and tried to take the comp completely on his own. So then could do whatever he wanted.
Although we hoped Dako would run the Official cup for us, unfortunately he was very defiant all the way along. We wanted clans to have a say and he did not. His attitude worried us, he repeatedly told us he knew best, and he would decide if he consulted with consult with clans or not, the one vote was a compromise he didn't even want to do that.
Now like i said before these two comps are the clan world. We need them to fair, and have good people running them. People who want the best for the Clan world and people who do not have such a big ego to think only they know best. that's a worrying situation down the track. We need TOs that will work with Cds, all the CDs want is whats best for everyone, nothing else.
After Dako publicly removed the two things we asked for, admin and The Cds felt we had little choice left. People stated that if we want to oversee the event then we should run it, so that was really the only choice we had left.
We really hoped we could work with Dako but it seems not. Please understand if this was his tournament then we would not have got involved at all. But i wasn't it has never belonged to him and belongs to the clan world now.
I am also not saying Dako is a bad TO or will make bad decisions or abuse people, i am referring to what has happened in the past. The only reason we had to take this was he refused to work with us at all. And his attitude caused us concern.
niMic wrote:crispybits wrote:niMic wrote:Gypsys Kiss wrote: I will say that unseeded competition are what dreams are made of, just ask Ronnie Radford.
Funny you should bring that up.
Hereford had played several ties versus more evenly matched opponents before Newcastle were even entered into the competition. In fact, their tie was the first one which Newcastle had to play in. How does that say anything about random versus seeding? If anything the situation is damn close to what josko's suggested format would lead to, with the lower ranked clans (Hereford) playing one or two ties alone, before potentially facing the top ranked clans (Newcastle) high on confidence from their earlier, more evenly matched ties.
That's not seeding (guaranteeing a team an easy draw), that's byes (allowing a team to enter in a later round), and there is a big difference between how the two work.
Yes, but it still makes the example irrelevant. Hereford did have to play one of the top teams around, which they would have to in a seeded system. How is that any different from LotZ playing TOFU in round 1? (random example). If they beat TOFU, as Hereford beat Newcastle, it will be seen as one of the best achievements in CCup history.
niMic wrote:crispybits wrote:niMic wrote:Gypsys Kiss wrote: I will say that unseeded competition are what dreams are made of, just ask Ronnie Radford.
Funny you should bring that up.
Hereford had played several ties versus more evenly matched opponents before Newcastle were even entered into the competition. In fact, their tie was the first one which Newcastle had to play in. How does that say anything about random versus seeding? If anything the situation is damn close to what josko's suggested format would lead to, with the lower ranked clans (Hereford) playing one or two ties alone, before potentially facing the top ranked clans (Newcastle) high on confidence from their earlier, more evenly matched ties.
That's not seeding (guaranteeing a team an easy draw), that's byes (allowing a team to enter in a later round), and there is a big difference between how the two work.
Yes, but it still makes the example irrelevant. Hereford did have to play one of the top teams around, which they would have to in a seeded system. How is that any different from LotZ playing TOFU in round 1? (random example). If they beat TOFU, as Hereford beat Newcastle, it will be seen as one of the best achievements in CCup history.
niMic wrote:Oh, okay. So you're saying you guys are all completely fine with running CC4 exactly as we've ran CCs 1 through 3? For some obscure reason I got a very different impression from all of the whining going on in all of the relevant threads, but I'm glad we both agree that we should just go back to how things were.
Splendid.
freakns wrote:niMic wrote:Oh, okay. So you're saying you guys are all completely fine with running CC4 exactly as we've ran CCs 1 through 3? For some obscure reason I got a very different impression from all of the whining going on in all of the relevant threads, but I'm glad we both agree that we should just go back to how things were.
Splendid.
was this referred to me?
if so, i too am glad we understand each other, and that bruce and his company should step out and let capable ppl of running CCup. i just have a question, have you said to your democratic leader how badly he is screwing things up?
and to make myself more clear, my whining wasnt about CCup format, it was and is about CDs and their actions.
Keefie wrote:crispybits wrote: I really hope keefie or someone has still got that PM chain and can send it over to you because then you will see just how far from the actual truth you are.
Glad to oblige mate.
Josko, please take care to read the second pm. I think you'll agree that no attempt has been made to coerce or manipulate other clans. I won't post any of the replies as it's not for me to reveal publicly other peoples private messages, but I can assure you that they contained nothing sinister.
The only attempts to manipulate / corrupt the vote came from Top 16 clans. I won't name them but they know who they are.
25th March - PM 1 sent to all clan leaders for clans not in the top 16.
Hello Everyone,
I'm writing to you all as the CD&F clan reps for clans who are currently outside of the top 16 in the F400 rankings.
This week there will be a vote in the CD&F regarding the seeding and draw format for the CC Conquerers Cup 4. As it stands at the moment it looks like we will be given three options to vote on (see below).
As I see it, options 1 & 3 both give the top clans a major advantage over all of us. Option 1 was used in CC3 and only 3 lower ranked clans made it into the last 16. Option 3 gives the top clans an even greater advantage in that they don't enter the competition until the later rounds. Why on earth should they have that advantage !!!!!!!
The only option that give our clans a realistic chance of progression through the rounds and a chance of getting a win or two under our belts, as well as a stab at a top 3 spot, is option 2.
The random draw is used successfully in cup competitions throughout the world in many major sports. Yes top teams can face each other in early rounds and minnows can progress further, but that adds to the romance and excitement of these competitions.
VOTE Option 2 if you don't want your clan to be Cannon Fodder for the top teams.
Best Regards
Keefie
29th March - PM 2 Same address list plus CD's are copied.
Hi Everyone,
Well looks like the arguments are continuing in both of the threads
Sadly some of the top clans including The Pack and Immortal Assassins are threatening to withdraw completely from this competition and set up their own if Option 2 wins the vote. If they do, then I'm positive that others will join them and CC4 will never happen. I for one really don't want that to happen.
Option 2 isn't wanted by the high ranked clans and option 1 isn't wanted by most of us who have voted so far. Therefore it looks like a compromise must be reached.
That leaves option 3, which was suggested by Josko.Ri of KORT. This option combines an element of randomness in the early draws plus there is seeding. I personally think that having 16 seeds in a competition that will most likely have between 30 and 40 entries is too many. 20 to 25% of the field being seeded is quite normal in most sporting competitions so I would propose that only the top 8 clans are seeded. The Headless Horsemen are prepared to change our vote, so I thought it only fair to inform you all of our intentions.
Take another look at Option 3a and see if you agree that it's a compromise that can be made in order to save the competition and a split in clan land.
Best Regards
Keefie
josko.ri wrote:Keefie wrote:http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=443&t=187980&p=4115754#p4115754
Can someone name me a sporting competition where 50% of the field are seeded ?
UEFA Champions League, Qualifying rounds 1,2,3. UEFA Europa League Qualifying rounds 1,2,3,4. FIFA World Cup Qualifiations, Elimination round..... Now when I answered your question, can you give example of any sports competition where draw is tOtally random?
Keefie wrote:Josko, think about it. Why would a clan outside of the top 16 in the F400 vote for an option that gives a preferential draw to the top 16. You could have dressed your idea in a frock and called it Mary but it was never going to win.
Keefie wrote:You really do have a warped view of reallity mate
josko.ri wrote:Fast Edited after seeing CoF post. THAT is democracy, he put his idea on place where everyone can see it, so everyone has chance to agree/disagree officially give him support (by putting their clan name together with his clan name). If he did the same in secret pms, that would be all but no democracy. And that is what Keefie did.
My counter argument on COF's post... there were months and months of discussions about format proposals, and now after 2 rounds of voting were done and after format is decided, you come with revolution idea. Where have you been all those months?
In my opinion he is just using situation that lower clans are right now revolted. That can lead to easy convince any lower clan to support right now his idea because his idea has more random element than current idea proposal, so lower clans who were supporting random draw will for sure now stand together with him. Not because they think his idea is the best, but because of personal bias against CDs, so whatever is presented to them and is not CDs idea they would support.
Chariot of Fire wrote:josko.ri wrote:Fast Edited after seeing CoF post. THAT is democracy, he put his idea on place where everyone can see it, so everyone has chance to agree/disagree officially give him support (by putting their clan name together with his clan name). If he did the same in secret pms, that would be all but no democracy. And that is what Keefie did.
My counter argument on COF's post... there were months and months of discussions about format proposals, and now after 2 rounds of voting were done and after format is decided, you come with revolution idea. Where have you been all those months?
In my opinion he is just using situation that lower clans are right now revolted. That can lead to easy convince any lower clan to support right now his idea because his idea has more random element than current idea proposal, so lower clans who were supporting random draw will for sure now stand together with him. Not because they think his idea is the best, but because of personal bias against CDs, so whatever is presented to them and is not CDs idea they would support.
You can counter all you like, but first I recommend you do some research before jumping in with accusations of spontaneous revolution, as if I've just dreamt-up this proposal:
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=443&t=187980&p=4116317&hilit=chariot#p4116182
Me...I want to be proactive and see some progress. Where do you stand on this? The voice of dissent (as usual) no doubt, simply muddying the waters. Either be constructive or go off and study some rocks or something.
josko.ri wrote:Keefie wrote:You really do have a warped view of reallity mate
You see, when it happens to be some discussion with arguments, then you are capable of just writing a sentence out of context. However, when it comes to your secret diplomacy behing the scenes, then you proved to be very capable of constructing convincing arguments.
Still asking you, how it is different to play in 8 player standard game and send secret pm to other player to support your strategy, or participate in democratic voting which has public place to discuss ideas, but you choose to do it by sending secret pms instead?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users