Random of all Random

[chapcrap]

Yeah but we all know the top clans are far too <<insert word here to your liking>> AWESOME to accept a challenge like this

Bring it DBC - we're the only ones so far to show any willingness to take you on!

Done.

where were you when the random league started if you are so into random ?

Osa has 4 wars now (not counting RL3 & CL5) and 2 coming up , no way to add one more now..

This is true. We have CL5, RL3, Empire, VVV, TSM, and CC4, plus negotiations with another clan. Our guys don't want anything else right now.

[Chewie1]

Yeah but we all know the top clans are far too <<insert word here to your liking>> AWESOME to accept a challenge like this

Bring it DBC - we're the only ones so far to show any willingness to take you on!

Done.

where were you when the random league started if you are so into random ?

Osa has 4 wars now (not counting RL3 & CL5) and 2 coming up , no way to add one more now..

This is true. We have CL5, RL3, Empire, VVV, TSM, and CC4, plus negotiations with another clan. Our guys don't want anything else right now.

We could postdate the start of the war OSA/FALLEN so to fit in your hectic schedules if your want to put us in our place

[jsnyder748]

its funny how all you guys care so much about this elitest crap....its online risk people

plus what silver said there is already a random league most clans are in....i think

Want to go to war then?

I like playing a lot vs anyone, but my clan doesn't do too many challenges at one time like OSA and I dont mind being in only 2-3 challenges at a time because I can just play random stuff. It would be up to mudpuppy and everyone else

[Swimmerdude99]

Suppose someone were to offer you a challenge if the 1v1s were taken away and each player were only allowed to play X number of times so that everyone got to play almost equal amount of games?

[Chewie1]

Suppose someone were to offer you a challenge if the 1v1s were taken away and each player were only allowed to play X number of times so that everyone got to play almost equal amount of games?

Wouldnt be truly random then would it.

Why drop the 1v1 s?

[IcePack]

Suppose someone were to offer you a challenge if the 1v1s were taken away and each player were only allowed to play X number of times so that everyone got to play almost equal amount of games?

Wouldnt be truly random then would it.

Why drop the 1v1 s?

Well if you truly want truly random perhaps you should make a list of clans and randomly select your opponent. By excluding so many clans and only targeting a top elitist clan you are removing an element of random as well.

[Chewie1]

Suppose someone were to offer you a challenge if the 1v1s were taken away and each player were only allowed to play X number of times so that everyone got to play almost equal amount of games?

Wouldnt be truly random then would it.

Why drop the 1v1 s?

Well if you truly want truly random perhaps you should make a list of clans and randomly select your opponent. By excluding so many clans and only targeting a top elitist clan you are removing an element of random as well.

But couldnt do that as the elitist clans would insist on being seeded

[Swimmerdude99]

Suppose someone were to offer you a challenge if the 1v1s were taken away and each player were only allowed to play X number of times so that everyone got to play almost equal amount of games?

Wouldnt be truly random then would it.

Why drop the 1v1 s?

Because 1v1s would make it too random. You might as well just draw straws to determine who wins in a 1v1. Then again maybe you should do that for the whole challenge if you don't mind 25 of the games being based on dice

[denominator]

Suppose someone were to offer you a challenge if the 1v1s were taken away and each player were only allowed to play X number of times so that everyone got to play almost equal amount of games?

Wouldnt be truly random then would it.

Why drop the 1v1 s?

Because 1v1s would make it too random. You might as well just draw straws to determine who wins in a 1v1. Then again maybe you should do that for the whole challenge if you don't mind 25 of the games being based on dice

So you actually believe that there is no skill in winning a 1v1 game?

[Swimmerdude99]

Suppose someone were to offer you a challenge if the 1v1s were taken away and each player were only allowed to play X number of times so that everyone got to play almost equal amount of games?

Wouldnt be truly random then would it.

Why drop the 1v1 s?

Because 1v1s would make it too random. You might as well just draw straws to determine who wins in a 1v1. Then again maybe you should do that for the whole challenge if you don't mind 25 of the games being based on dice

So you actually believe that there is no skill in winning a 1v1 game?

If both players know what they are doing it is 100% skill. I'd say on the whole a 1v1 match is gonna be 80% luck and 20% skill.

[Conde180711]

DBC will hold their own against any clan with this. We are all great players, just we suck at playing scripted maps that the other clan picks out.

this made me laugh, fair play! "we are all great players", we just suck at what being a clan is all about

[Chewie1]

DBC will hold their own against any clan with this. We are all great players, just we suck at playing scripted maps that the other clan picks out.

this made me laugh, fair play! "we are all great players", we just suck at what being a clan is all about

I was being generous to my clan mates.

We have like 2 great players the rest suck... but hey got to big my pals up

[notyou2]

DBC will hold their own against any clan with this. We are all great players, just we suck at playing scripted maps that the other clan picks out.

this made me laugh, fair play! "we are all great players", we just suck at what being a clan is all about

We aren't an elitist clan, we are a group of elitist individuals, oh and a Buddhist.

[BGtheBrain]

*****

[cooldeals]

Are you willing to decrease the 1 v 1 to 20% so that this will be medal eligible?
WIll the 1 v 1 games be a set of 5 games for 1 point like normal or is it just 1, 1 v 1?

TNC will do this

well this could really help with some medals why not.

[BGtheBrain]

*****

[Chewie1]

Are you willing to decrease the 1 v 1 to 20% so that this will be medal eligible?
WIll the 1 v 1 games be a set of 5 games for 1 point like normal or is it just 1, 1 v 1?

TNC will do this

well this could really help with some medals why not.

I think the random aspect will be good training and the game volume will bw nice

So the maximum 1v1 that would keep a war medal-eligible is 20%?

20 4v4
20 3v3
20 2v2
10 1v1

Is that an acceptable format?

[BGtheBrain]

*****

[MoB Deadly]

Wait. Are we only allowed to have 16 players?

[BGtheBrain]

*****

[lilrvrgrl]

I'll play.

[Genoke]

20 4v4
20 3v3
20 2v2
10 1v1

Is that an acceptable format?

this is more acceptable yes...
is this just 1 clan war you seek or is this going to become a tourney with several clans?
and how many games/week would that be now?

[Genoke]

Wait. Are we only allowed to have 16 players?

no problem for us, we don't have that many!

[anonymus]

Wait. Are we only allowed to have 16 players?

no problem for us, we don't have that many!

but we are all kind of random people..


/

[BGtheBrain]

*****